Acute venous thromboembolism in acute pancreatitis based on the severity: a retrospective cohort study

Hassam Ali, Swethaa Manickam, R. Pamarthy, M. Farooq, W. Leland
{"title":"Acute venous thromboembolism in acute pancreatitis based on the severity: a retrospective cohort study","authors":"Hassam Ali, Swethaa Manickam, R. Pamarthy, M. Farooq, W. Leland","doi":"10.1097/JP9.0000000000000085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: Acute pancreatitis (AP) results in systemic inflammatory responses and activates coagulation pathways. We intend to investigate the risk and hospital outcomes of acute venous thromboembolisms (VTE) in patients with AP. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with AP from 2016 to 2019 using the National Inpatient Sample database. Primary outcome was the effect of VTE on the length of stay, inpatient costs, and mortality. Hierarchical multivariate logistic regression models were built using univariate screens. Results: The study included 909,354 weighted discharges with AP. 2.1% of cases had an acute VTE. The length of stay was 5.9 days longer in the hospital of AP patients with VTE compared to AP with no VTE (P < 0.001). Total hospital charge per patient was $71,914 in patients with VTE compared to AP with no VTE (P < 0.001). Mortality was higher in AP patients with VTE compared to AP with no VTE (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 4.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.4–5.3, P < 0.001). AP was associated with an increased VTE risk during inpatient stay (AOR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04–1.1, P < 0.001) There was an increased association of lower and upper extremity deep venous thrombosis with AP without necrosis (AOR 6.9, 95% CI 6.4–7.4, P < 0.001) and AP with infected necrosis (AOR 12.2, 95% CI 10.6–14.1, P < 0.001) but not in AP without necrosis (AOR 0.77, 95% CI 0.74–0.81, P < 0.001). Conclusion: VTE in AP increases length of stay and inpatient costs. The prognosis is poor in such patients, with increased inpatient mortality compared to no VTE. AP with necrosis can increase chances of all VTE subtypes; however, AP without necrosis does not increase upper and lower extremity VTE risk.","PeriodicalId":92925,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pancreatology","volume":"5 1","pages":"10 - 17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pancreatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JP9.0000000000000085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Objective: Acute pancreatitis (AP) results in systemic inflammatory responses and activates coagulation pathways. We intend to investigate the risk and hospital outcomes of acute venous thromboembolisms (VTE) in patients with AP. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with AP from 2016 to 2019 using the National Inpatient Sample database. Primary outcome was the effect of VTE on the length of stay, inpatient costs, and mortality. Hierarchical multivariate logistic regression models were built using univariate screens. Results: The study included 909,354 weighted discharges with AP. 2.1% of cases had an acute VTE. The length of stay was 5.9 days longer in the hospital of AP patients with VTE compared to AP with no VTE (P < 0.001). Total hospital charge per patient was $71,914 in patients with VTE compared to AP with no VTE (P < 0.001). Mortality was higher in AP patients with VTE compared to AP with no VTE (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 4.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.4–5.3, P < 0.001). AP was associated with an increased VTE risk during inpatient stay (AOR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04–1.1, P < 0.001) There was an increased association of lower and upper extremity deep venous thrombosis with AP without necrosis (AOR 6.9, 95% CI 6.4–7.4, P < 0.001) and AP with infected necrosis (AOR 12.2, 95% CI 10.6–14.1, P < 0.001) but not in AP without necrosis (AOR 0.77, 95% CI 0.74–0.81, P < 0.001). Conclusion: VTE in AP increases length of stay and inpatient costs. The prognosis is poor in such patients, with increased inpatient mortality compared to no VTE. AP with necrosis can increase chances of all VTE subtypes; however, AP without necrosis does not increase upper and lower extremity VTE risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性胰腺炎急性静脉血栓栓塞的严重程度:一项回顾性队列研究
摘要目的:急性胰腺炎(AP)引起全身炎症反应并激活凝血途径。我们打算调查AP患者急性静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的风险和医院结局。方法:我们使用国家住院患者样本数据库对2016年至2019年的AP患者进行回顾性分析。主要结局是静脉血栓栓塞对住院时间、住院费用和死亡率的影响。采用单变量筛选建立分层多元逻辑回归模型。结果:该研究纳入了909354例AP加权出院患者,2.1%的患者发生急性静脉血栓栓塞。有VTE的AP患者住院时间比无VTE的AP患者长5.9天(P < 0.001)。与没有VTE的AP患者相比,VTE患者的每位患者总住院费用为71,914美元(P < 0.001)。合并VTE的AP患者死亡率高于未合并VTE的AP(校正优势比[AOR] 4.2, 95%可信区间[CI]: 3.4-5.3, P < 0.001)。AP与住院期间VTE风险增加相关(AOR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.1, P < 0.001)。无坏死AP (AOR 6.9, 95% CI 6.4-7.4, P < 0.001)和AP合并感染性坏死(AOR 12.2, 95% CI 10.6-14.1, P < 0.001)与下肢和上肢深静脉血栓形成的相关性增加,但与无坏死AP无相关性(AOR 0.77, 95% CI 0.74-0.81, P < 0.001)。结论:静脉血栓栓塞增加了AP患者的住院时间和住院费用。这些患者的预后较差,与无静脉血栓栓塞患者相比,住院死亡率增加。AP伴坏死可增加所有静脉血栓栓塞亚型发生的机会;然而,没有坏死的AP不会增加上肢和下肢静脉血栓栓塞的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reappraisal of the Parenchyma-Sparing Resections for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Chinese High-volume Center Experience Phase angle is an indicator of GLIM-diagnosed malnutrition in patients undergoing major pancreatic and biliary surgery: a cross-sectional study Consensus on the Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Grade 3 Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Urinastatin combined with octreotide versus sole octreotide in severe acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis Integrated analysis of single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing to construct a CD8 + T cell-related immune gene signature in pancreatic cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1