Male Hypogonadism Does Not Affect Surgical Outcomes After Primary Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement

Andrew T. Gabrielson, Logan B. Galansky, Una Choi, Andrew Cohen
{"title":"Male Hypogonadism Does Not Affect Surgical Outcomes After Primary Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement","authors":"Andrew T. Gabrielson, Logan B. Galansky, Una Choi, Andrew Cohen","doi":"10.1097/ju9.0000000000000047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Studies suggest a link between hypogonadism and complications after artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement. We investigated this association and evaluated whether testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) before AUS placement attenuates this risk in hypogonadal patients.\n \n \n \n A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the TriNetX network between 2008 and 2022. We defined 2 groups undergoing primary AUS: (1) eugonadal and (2) hypogonadal patients. We further assessed the hypogonadal cohort by comparing TRT recipients with TRT-naïve patients before AUS. Propensity score matching was used to account for differences in covariates between eugonadal and hypogonadal cohorts. Outcomes included 5-year all-cause revision, erosion, mechanical failure, or device infection.\n \n \n \n A total of 4308 eugonadal and 514 hypogonadal patients (95 with TRT, 409 TRT-naïve) were included. After matching, the eugonadal and hypogonadal cohorts each contained 504 patients. The median follow-up times for the eugonadal and hypogonadal cohorts were 6 and 5 years, respectively. We found no difference in 5-year all-cause revision (25% vs 28%, P = .35), erosion (1.2% vs 2.2%, P = .22), device infection (3.6% vs 4.0%, P = .74), or mechanical failure (16% vs 17%, P = .67) between eugonadal and hypogonadal patients. In the hypogonadal subanalysis, we found no difference in 5-year device outcomes between TRT recipients and TRT-naïve patients. Post-AUS, only 22 (5%) patients in the TRT-naïve arm received new TRT, suggesting minimal crossover.\n \n \n \n In matched cohorts of eugonadal and hypogonadal patients undergoing primary AUS placement, we observed no difference in 5-year device outcomes. TRT does not appear to affect surgical outcomes in hypogonadal patients undergoing AUS placement. These hypothesis-generating findings warrant further evaluation.\n","PeriodicalId":74033,"journal":{"name":"JU open plus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JU open plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju9.0000000000000047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Studies suggest a link between hypogonadism and complications after artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement. We investigated this association and evaluated whether testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) before AUS placement attenuates this risk in hypogonadal patients. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the TriNetX network between 2008 and 2022. We defined 2 groups undergoing primary AUS: (1) eugonadal and (2) hypogonadal patients. We further assessed the hypogonadal cohort by comparing TRT recipients with TRT-naïve patients before AUS. Propensity score matching was used to account for differences in covariates between eugonadal and hypogonadal cohorts. Outcomes included 5-year all-cause revision, erosion, mechanical failure, or device infection. A total of 4308 eugonadal and 514 hypogonadal patients (95 with TRT, 409 TRT-naïve) were included. After matching, the eugonadal and hypogonadal cohorts each contained 504 patients. The median follow-up times for the eugonadal and hypogonadal cohorts were 6 and 5 years, respectively. We found no difference in 5-year all-cause revision (25% vs 28%, P = .35), erosion (1.2% vs 2.2%, P = .22), device infection (3.6% vs 4.0%, P = .74), or mechanical failure (16% vs 17%, P = .67) between eugonadal and hypogonadal patients. In the hypogonadal subanalysis, we found no difference in 5-year device outcomes between TRT recipients and TRT-naïve patients. Post-AUS, only 22 (5%) patients in the TRT-naïve arm received new TRT, suggesting minimal crossover. In matched cohorts of eugonadal and hypogonadal patients undergoing primary AUS placement, we observed no difference in 5-year device outcomes. TRT does not appear to affect surgical outcomes in hypogonadal patients undergoing AUS placement. These hypothesis-generating findings warrant further evaluation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
男性性腺功能低下不影响原发性人工尿道括约肌置入术后的手术结果
研究表明性腺功能减退与人工尿道括约肌置入术后并发症之间存在联系。我们研究了这种相关性,并评估了AUS植入前的睾酮替代疗法(TRT)是否能减轻性腺功能减退患者的这种风险。2008年至2022年间,使用TriNetX网络进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们定义了两组接受原发性AUS的患者:(1)性腺正常患者和(2)性腺功能减退患者。我们通过比较接受TRT的患者和AUS前的TRT幼稚患者,进一步评估了性腺功能减退的队列。倾向评分匹配用于解释性腺正常和性腺功能低下队列之间协变量的差异。结果包括5年全因翻修、侵蚀、机械故障或器械感染。共纳入4308名真性腺和514名性腺功能减退患者(95名TRT患者,409名TRT幼稚患者)。匹配后,性腺正常和性腺功能低下的队列各包含504名患者。性腺正常组和性腺功能低下组的中位随访时间分别为6年和5年。我们发现,正常性腺和性腺功能减退患者在5年全因翻修(25%对28%,P=.35)、糜烂(1.2%对2.2%,P=.22)、装置感染(3.6%对4.0%,P=.74)或机械故障(16%对17%,P=.67)方面没有差异。在性腺功能减退亚分析中,我们发现TRT接受者和TRT幼稚患者的5年装置结果没有差异。AUS后,TRT幼稚组中只有22名(5%)患者接受了新的TRT,这表明交叉最小。在接受原发性AUS植入的性腺正常和性腺功能低下患者的匹配队列中,我们观察到5年装置结果没有差异。TRT似乎不会影响接受AUS置入术的性腺功能减退患者的手术结果。这些产生假设的发现值得进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Urinary Bladder Melanosis Diagnosed Simultaneously With Urothelial Carcinoma: A Case Report and Literature Review Artificial Intelligence–Generated Patient Information Videos for Partial Nephrectomy by Medical Students With Expert Validation: A Pilot Study Using a Reconstructive Ladder for Surgical Reconstruction of Transplant Ureteral Stricture Disease Editorial Comment: Telehealth in Urology Beyond COVID-19 Limitations of ChatGPT for Patient Education Regarding Frequently Searched Questions About Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1