Factors Affecting Automatic Positive Airway Pressure Therapy Adherence in Patients Who had Completed the 3-Month Compliance Assessment for Korean National Health Insurance Coverage

Q4 Medicine Sleep Medicine Research Pub Date : 2021-12-20 DOI:10.17241/smr.2021.00990
Min Su Kim, Min Gyu Kim, Jae-Yoon Kang, Jaein Chung, Yu Ju Seo, Soo-Kyoung Park, Ki-Sang Rha, Yong Min Kim
{"title":"Factors Affecting Automatic Positive Airway Pressure Therapy Adherence in Patients Who had Completed the 3-Month Compliance Assessment for Korean National Health Insurance Coverage","authors":"Min Su Kim, Min Gyu Kim, Jae-Yoon Kang, Jaein Chung, Yu Ju Seo, Soo-Kyoung Park, Ki-Sang Rha, Yong Min Kim","doi":"10.17241/smr.2021.00990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and ObjectiveaaThe numbers of prescriptions for continuous positive airway pressure and automatic positive airway pressure (APAP) machines have increased dramatically since the Korean government changed national health insurance coverage. This study examined adherence to APAP therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea who completed the 3-month adaptation period required by the insurance service, and evaluated the factors predictive of good adherence. MethodsaaWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of a total of 315 patients who received APAP prescriptions between July 2018 and December 2019. After screening, 189 patients were analyzed. Patients were divided into an adherent (AD) group and a non-adherent (NAD) group based on 9 months’ APAP adherence. Patient demographics, medical history, body mass index and pretreatment polysomnography results, as well as APAP therapy adherence-related variables, the 90th percentile pressure, residual apnea hypopnea status, and type of devices or managers were compared between the two groups. ResultsaaWe found mean usage times, mean pressures, days with ≥ 4 hours of use a day, and 90th percentile pressures differed significantly between the AD and NAD groups. The device-related data at months 1 and 3 and 9 were similar. One type of device performed differently compared to the other devices, but this did not affect adherence. ConclusionsaaThe mean pressure and 90th percentile pressure were the main determinants of adherence in patients who passed a 3-month compliance assessment conducted by the Korean National Institute of Health. The data on adherence at months 1, 3 and 9 were similar. Sleep Med Res","PeriodicalId":37318,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Medicine Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17241/smr.2021.00990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background and ObjectiveaaThe numbers of prescriptions for continuous positive airway pressure and automatic positive airway pressure (APAP) machines have increased dramatically since the Korean government changed national health insurance coverage. This study examined adherence to APAP therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea who completed the 3-month adaptation period required by the insurance service, and evaluated the factors predictive of good adherence. MethodsaaWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of a total of 315 patients who received APAP prescriptions between July 2018 and December 2019. After screening, 189 patients were analyzed. Patients were divided into an adherent (AD) group and a non-adherent (NAD) group based on 9 months’ APAP adherence. Patient demographics, medical history, body mass index and pretreatment polysomnography results, as well as APAP therapy adherence-related variables, the 90th percentile pressure, residual apnea hypopnea status, and type of devices or managers were compared between the two groups. ResultsaaWe found mean usage times, mean pressures, days with ≥ 4 hours of use a day, and 90th percentile pressures differed significantly between the AD and NAD groups. The device-related data at months 1 and 3 and 9 were similar. One type of device performed differently compared to the other devices, but this did not affect adherence. ConclusionsaaThe mean pressure and 90th percentile pressure were the main determinants of adherence in patients who passed a 3-month compliance assessment conducted by the Korean National Institute of Health. The data on adherence at months 1, 3 and 9 were similar. Sleep Med Res
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
完成韩国国民健康保险3个月依从性评估的患者对自动气道正压治疗依从性的影响因素
背景与目的自韩国政府改变国民健康保险覆盖范围以来,持续气道正压和自动气道正压(APAP)机的处方数量急剧增加。本研究考察了完成保险服务要求的3个月适应期的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者对APAP治疗的依从性,并评估了预测良好依从性的因素。方法回顾性分析2018年7月至2019年12月期间接受APAP处方的315例患者的病历。筛选后,对189例患者进行分析。根据9个月的APAP依从性将患者分为粘附(AD)组和非粘附(NAD)组。比较两组患者的人口统计学、病史、体重指数和预处理多导睡眠图结果,以及APAP治疗依从性相关变量、第90百分位压力、剩余呼吸暂停低通气状态、设备或管理器类型。结果AD组和NAD组的平均使用时间、平均压力、每天使用≥4小时天数和第90百分位压力存在显著差异。第1个月、第3个月和第9个月的设备相关数据相似。一种类型的设备与其他设备相比表现不同,但这并不影响依从性。结论:平均血压和第90百分位血压是通过韩国国立卫生研究院进行的为期3个月的依从性评估的患者依从性的主要决定因素。第1、3和9个月的依从性数据相似。睡眠医疗
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep Medicine Research
Sleep Medicine Research Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Oral Appliance Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Clinical Benefits and Limitations Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Behavior Disorder: What Is Known and What Should Be Studied Sleep Quality Assessment in Correlation to Autonomic Nerve Function in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Positional Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Therapeutic Modalities and Clinical Effects Subcutaneous Emphysema Following Nasal Positive Airway Pressure Therapy in a Patient With a History of Tongue Base Tumor Resection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1