Comprehensiveness, Coordination and Continuity in Services Provided to Young Children with Cerebral Palsy and Their Families in Norway

IF 1.1 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES Child Care in Practice Pub Date : 2021-03-29 DOI:10.1080/13575279.2021.1898934
Runa Kalleson, R. Jahnsen, S. Østensjø
{"title":"Comprehensiveness, Coordination and Continuity in Services Provided to Young Children with Cerebral Palsy and Their Families in Norway","authors":"Runa Kalleson, R. Jahnsen, S. Østensjø","doi":"10.1080/13575279.2021.1898934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Cerebral palsy (CP) is one of the most common childhood disorders requiring comprehensive and coordinated care over time. This study aimed to add knowledge about health, educational and social services received by children and families throughout early childhood, with special attention on coordination services provided. Methods The study was designed as a prospective longitudinal cohort study utilising data from two CP registers in Norway. Fifty-seven families with children with CP aged 12–57 months with different levels of mobility limitations classified according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System were included. Services were mapped via the parent-reported Habilitation Service questionnaire at least three times. The relationships between mobility limitations and the number of services and type of coordination services were explored using a linear mixed model and Chi Square/Fischer’s exact test. Continuity in the provision of services was explored by identifying interruptions in the longitudinal reports on services received. Results Most of the families received both health, education and social services as well as some types of coordination services. The number and type of services received varied to some extent depending on the children’s mobility limitations. Multidisciplinary team and an individual service plan were widespread coordination services, while having a service coordinator was most common among the families raising a child with severe mobility limitations. Interruptions in the longitudinal reporting of services were frequent, especially in the receiving of coordination services. Conclusion The comprehensiveness of the provided services emphasises the need for coordination services. The relatively low proportion of families provided with a coordinator and the frequent interruptions in the longitudinal reports on services indicate some persistent challenges in the service system.","PeriodicalId":35141,"journal":{"name":"Child Care in Practice","volume":"28 1","pages":"610 - 624"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13575279.2021.1898934","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Care in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13575279.2021.1898934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Cerebral palsy (CP) is one of the most common childhood disorders requiring comprehensive and coordinated care over time. This study aimed to add knowledge about health, educational and social services received by children and families throughout early childhood, with special attention on coordination services provided. Methods The study was designed as a prospective longitudinal cohort study utilising data from two CP registers in Norway. Fifty-seven families with children with CP aged 12–57 months with different levels of mobility limitations classified according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System were included. Services were mapped via the parent-reported Habilitation Service questionnaire at least three times. The relationships between mobility limitations and the number of services and type of coordination services were explored using a linear mixed model and Chi Square/Fischer’s exact test. Continuity in the provision of services was explored by identifying interruptions in the longitudinal reports on services received. Results Most of the families received both health, education and social services as well as some types of coordination services. The number and type of services received varied to some extent depending on the children’s mobility limitations. Multidisciplinary team and an individual service plan were widespread coordination services, while having a service coordinator was most common among the families raising a child with severe mobility limitations. Interruptions in the longitudinal reporting of services were frequent, especially in the receiving of coordination services. Conclusion The comprehensiveness of the provided services emphasises the need for coordination services. The relatively low proportion of families provided with a coordinator and the frequent interruptions in the longitudinal reports on services indicate some persistent challenges in the service system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挪威向脑瘫幼儿及其家庭提供的服务的全面性、协调性和连续性
摘要背景脑瘫是最常见的儿童疾病之一,需要长期的综合协调护理。这项研究旨在增加对儿童和家庭在整个幼儿期所接受的健康、教育和社会服务的了解,并特别关注所提供的协调服务。方法该研究是一项前瞻性纵向队列研究,利用挪威两个CP登记处的数据。根据总运动功能分类系统分类,57个有12-17个月CP儿童的家庭具有不同程度的行动受限。至少三次通过家长报告的适应服务问卷绘制服务地图。使用线性混合模型和卡方/菲舍尔精确检验,探讨了移动性限制与服务数量和协调服务类型之间的关系。通过查明所收到服务的纵向报告中的中断情况,探讨了提供服务的连续性。结果大多数家庭接受了健康、教育和社会服务以及一些类型的协调服务。所接受服务的数量和类型在一定程度上因儿童行动不便而有所不同。多学科团队和个人服务计划是广泛的协调服务,而在抚养行动不便儿童的家庭中,由服务协调员最为常见。服务的纵向报告经常中断,特别是在接受协调服务方面。结论所提供服务的全面性强调了协调服务的必要性。为家庭提供协调员的比例相对较低,而且关于服务的纵向报告经常中断,这表明服务系统中存在一些持续的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Child Care in Practice
Child Care in Practice Nursing-Community and Home Care
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Child Care in Practice is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that provides an international forum for professionals working in all disciplines in the provision of children’s services, including social work, social care, health care, medicine, psychology, education, the police and probationary services, and solicitors and barristers working in the family law and youth justice sectors. The strategic aims and objectives of the journal are: • To develop the knowledge base of practitioners, managers and other professionals responsible for the delivery of professional child care services. The journal seeks to contribute to the achievement of quality services and the promotion of the highest standards. • To achieve an equity of input from all disciplines working with children. The multi-disciplinary nature of the journal reflects that the key to many successful outcomes in the child care field lies in the close co-operation between different disciplines. • To raise awareness of often-neglected issues such as marginalization of ethnic minorities and problems consequent upon poverty and disability. • To keep abreast of and continue to influence local and international child care practice in response to emerging policy. • To include the views of those who are in receipt of multi-disciplinary child care services. • To welcome submissions on promising practice developments and the findings from new research to highlight the breadth of the work of the journal’s work.
期刊最新文献
A Narrative Review that Explores the Influence of Physical Activity on Care Experienced Children and Young People’s Mental Health and Wellbeing Breastfeeding Promotion and Support at Child Daycare Centers: Current Scenario in Five Argentine Provinces How has Covid-19 Impacted on Playwork – One Year on from Returning from Lockdown The View of Minority Youth on Cultural Continuity When Developing Their Identity in Majority Foster Homes Perceptions of Interprofessional Collaboration for Children with Multiple and Complex Needs: Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a New Scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1