{"title":"Comprehensiveness, Coordination and Continuity in Services Provided to Young Children with Cerebral Palsy and Their Families in Norway","authors":"Runa Kalleson, R. Jahnsen, S. Østensjø","doi":"10.1080/13575279.2021.1898934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Cerebral palsy (CP) is one of the most common childhood disorders requiring comprehensive and coordinated care over time. This study aimed to add knowledge about health, educational and social services received by children and families throughout early childhood, with special attention on coordination services provided. Methods The study was designed as a prospective longitudinal cohort study utilising data from two CP registers in Norway. Fifty-seven families with children with CP aged 12–57 months with different levels of mobility limitations classified according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System were included. Services were mapped via the parent-reported Habilitation Service questionnaire at least three times. The relationships between mobility limitations and the number of services and type of coordination services were explored using a linear mixed model and Chi Square/Fischer’s exact test. Continuity in the provision of services was explored by identifying interruptions in the longitudinal reports on services received. Results Most of the families received both health, education and social services as well as some types of coordination services. The number and type of services received varied to some extent depending on the children’s mobility limitations. Multidisciplinary team and an individual service plan were widespread coordination services, while having a service coordinator was most common among the families raising a child with severe mobility limitations. Interruptions in the longitudinal reporting of services were frequent, especially in the receiving of coordination services. Conclusion The comprehensiveness of the provided services emphasises the need for coordination services. The relatively low proportion of families provided with a coordinator and the frequent interruptions in the longitudinal reports on services indicate some persistent challenges in the service system.","PeriodicalId":35141,"journal":{"name":"Child Care in Practice","volume":"28 1","pages":"610 - 624"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13575279.2021.1898934","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Care in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13575279.2021.1898934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
ABSTRACT Background Cerebral palsy (CP) is one of the most common childhood disorders requiring comprehensive and coordinated care over time. This study aimed to add knowledge about health, educational and social services received by children and families throughout early childhood, with special attention on coordination services provided. Methods The study was designed as a prospective longitudinal cohort study utilising data from two CP registers in Norway. Fifty-seven families with children with CP aged 12–57 months with different levels of mobility limitations classified according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System were included. Services were mapped via the parent-reported Habilitation Service questionnaire at least three times. The relationships between mobility limitations and the number of services and type of coordination services were explored using a linear mixed model and Chi Square/Fischer’s exact test. Continuity in the provision of services was explored by identifying interruptions in the longitudinal reports on services received. Results Most of the families received both health, education and social services as well as some types of coordination services. The number and type of services received varied to some extent depending on the children’s mobility limitations. Multidisciplinary team and an individual service plan were widespread coordination services, while having a service coordinator was most common among the families raising a child with severe mobility limitations. Interruptions in the longitudinal reporting of services were frequent, especially in the receiving of coordination services. Conclusion The comprehensiveness of the provided services emphasises the need for coordination services. The relatively low proportion of families provided with a coordinator and the frequent interruptions in the longitudinal reports on services indicate some persistent challenges in the service system.
期刊介绍:
Child Care in Practice is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that provides an international forum for professionals working in all disciplines in the provision of children’s services, including social work, social care, health care, medicine, psychology, education, the police and probationary services, and solicitors and barristers working in the family law and youth justice sectors. The strategic aims and objectives of the journal are: • To develop the knowledge base of practitioners, managers and other professionals responsible for the delivery of professional child care services. The journal seeks to contribute to the achievement of quality services and the promotion of the highest standards. • To achieve an equity of input from all disciplines working with children. The multi-disciplinary nature of the journal reflects that the key to many successful outcomes in the child care field lies in the close co-operation between different disciplines. • To raise awareness of often-neglected issues such as marginalization of ethnic minorities and problems consequent upon poverty and disability. • To keep abreast of and continue to influence local and international child care practice in response to emerging policy. • To include the views of those who are in receipt of multi-disciplinary child care services. • To welcome submissions on promising practice developments and the findings from new research to highlight the breadth of the work of the journal’s work.