Program-level assessment planning in Australia: the considerations and practices of university academics

IF 4.1 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education Pub Date : 2022-10-22 DOI:10.1080/02602938.2022.2134553
N. Charlton, R. Newsham-West
{"title":"Program-level assessment planning in Australia: the considerations and practices of university academics","authors":"N. Charlton, R. Newsham-West","doi":"10.1080/02602938.2022.2134553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Quality assessment in higher education needs to drive learning to produce graduates with disciplinary knowledge and employable skills. Performance-based funding requires universities to focus on graduate outcomes and future employment status. Research was conducted to investigate how program-level assessment planning is occurring within Australian universities, to determine academics understanding what aspects they consider and the assessment practice they identify as essential at the program-planning level. Constructivist grounded theory underpins the methodological approach and 18 academics were interviewed. Participants included Associate Deans and Program Directors (or equivalent roles) from seven Australian universities, in the accredited disciplines of dietetics and physiotherapy and non-accredited degrees in biomedical science and science. The results indicate that academics consider a myriad of factors including policies, curriculum, skills, and accreditation. Assessment practices identified as essential incorporate constructive alignment, a range of assessment tasks, authentic, and continuous assessments. The goal of program-level assessment planning is to holistically sequence assessment tasks to enhance students’ employability, so they become successful graduates and secure employment, which enables universities to acquire future funding.","PeriodicalId":48267,"journal":{"name":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education","volume":"48 1","pages":"820 - 833"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2134553","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Quality assessment in higher education needs to drive learning to produce graduates with disciplinary knowledge and employable skills. Performance-based funding requires universities to focus on graduate outcomes and future employment status. Research was conducted to investigate how program-level assessment planning is occurring within Australian universities, to determine academics understanding what aspects they consider and the assessment practice they identify as essential at the program-planning level. Constructivist grounded theory underpins the methodological approach and 18 academics were interviewed. Participants included Associate Deans and Program Directors (or equivalent roles) from seven Australian universities, in the accredited disciplines of dietetics and physiotherapy and non-accredited degrees in biomedical science and science. The results indicate that academics consider a myriad of factors including policies, curriculum, skills, and accreditation. Assessment practices identified as essential incorporate constructive alignment, a range of assessment tasks, authentic, and continuous assessments. The goal of program-level assessment planning is to holistically sequence assessment tasks to enhance students’ employability, so they become successful graduates and secure employment, which enables universities to acquire future funding.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚项目级评估规划:大学学术界的思考与实践
摘要高等教育质量评估需要推动学习,培养具有学科知识和就业技能的毕业生。基于绩效的资助要求大学关注毕业生的成绩和未来的就业状况。进行研究是为了调查澳大利亚大学内部的项目级评估规划是如何进行的,以确定学术界对他们所考虑的方面以及他们认为在项目规划层面至关重要的评估实践的理解。建构主义基础理论是方法论的基础,18位学者接受了采访。参与者包括来自七所澳大利亚大学的副院长和项目主任(或同等职位),他们分别是营养学和物理疗法的认证学科以及生物医学和科学的非认证学位。研究结果表明,学术界考虑了许多因素,包括政策、课程、技能和认证。被确定为至关重要的评估实践包括建设性的一致性、一系列评估任务、真实和持续的评估。项目级评估规划的目标是对评估任务进行全面排序,以提高学生的就业能力,从而使他们成为成功的毕业生并确保就业,这使大学能够获得未来的资金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
15.90%
发文量
70
期刊最新文献
‘There was very little room for me to be me’: the lived tensions between assessment standardisation and student diversity Perceptions of feedback and engagement with feedback among undergraduates: an educational identities approach Feedback engagement as a multidimensional construct: a validation study Interacting with ChatGPT for internal feedback and factors affecting feedback quality Diversity of pedagogical feedback designs: results from a scoping review of feedback research in higher education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1