Fractional Flow Reserve Derived from Computer Tomography in Asymptomatic Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Albuminuria without Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis—A Surrogate for Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction?

J. Lambrechtsen, L. Heinsen, J. Larsson, G. Pararajasingam, K. Egstrup
{"title":"Fractional Flow Reserve Derived from Computer Tomography in Asymptomatic Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Albuminuria without Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis—A Surrogate for Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction?","authors":"J. Lambrechtsen, L. Heinsen, J. Larsson, G. Pararajasingam, K. Egstrup","doi":"10.3390/hearts2030029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) patients with albuminuria have coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). Fractional flow reserve assessed by coronary computed tomography angiography (FFRct) is dependent on the structure and function of the microcirculation and is likely influenced by CMD. We aimed to evaluate if asymptomatic patients with T2D who had no significant coronary artery stenosis but had been diagnosed with albuminuria had lower value of nadir FFRct compared to asymptomatic patients with T2D and no albuminuria. Methods and results: This was a cross-sectional study which compared the mean nadir FFRct values in coronary arteries in patients with T2D who had no symptoms of angina. The T2D patients were divided into two groups (albuminuria and no albuminuria) with albuminuria being defined as albumin–creatinine-ratio (ACR) ≥30 milligram per gram. The nadir FFRct values were compared between the two groups for left anterior descendent artery (FFRct-LAD), circumflex artery (FFRct-CX), and right coronary artery (FFRct-RCA) by using a two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann–Whitney) test. Ninety-eight patients without albuminuria and 26 patients with albuminuria were included. No significant differences in mean values were detected for FFRct-CX 0.86 ± 0.07 and 0.88 ± 0.0, FFRct-RCA 0.88 ± 0.05 and 0.88 ± 0.07, or for FFRct-LAD 0.82 ± 0.07 and 0.82 ± 0.07 in patients with albuminuria and without albuminuria, respectively. Conclusion: In this observational study, we did not find that FFRct was affected by CMD. Therefore, it is not a surrogate for microvascular dysfunction in asymptomatic T2D patients with albuminuria.","PeriodicalId":93563,"journal":{"name":"Hearts (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3390/hearts2030029","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearts (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/hearts2030029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) patients with albuminuria have coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). Fractional flow reserve assessed by coronary computed tomography angiography (FFRct) is dependent on the structure and function of the microcirculation and is likely influenced by CMD. We aimed to evaluate if asymptomatic patients with T2D who had no significant coronary artery stenosis but had been diagnosed with albuminuria had lower value of nadir FFRct compared to asymptomatic patients with T2D and no albuminuria. Methods and results: This was a cross-sectional study which compared the mean nadir FFRct values in coronary arteries in patients with T2D who had no symptoms of angina. The T2D patients were divided into two groups (albuminuria and no albuminuria) with albuminuria being defined as albumin–creatinine-ratio (ACR) ≥30 milligram per gram. The nadir FFRct values were compared between the two groups for left anterior descendent artery (FFRct-LAD), circumflex artery (FFRct-CX), and right coronary artery (FFRct-RCA) by using a two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann–Whitney) test. Ninety-eight patients without albuminuria and 26 patients with albuminuria were included. No significant differences in mean values were detected for FFRct-CX 0.86 ± 0.07 and 0.88 ± 0.0, FFRct-RCA 0.88 ± 0.05 and 0.88 ± 0.07, or for FFRct-LAD 0.82 ± 0.07 and 0.82 ± 0.07 in patients with albuminuria and without albuminuria, respectively. Conclusion: In this observational study, we did not find that FFRct was affected by CMD. Therefore, it is not a surrogate for microvascular dysfunction in asymptomatic T2D patients with albuminuria.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算机断层扫描显示无明显冠状动脉狭窄的2型糖尿病蛋白尿患者的血流储备分数-冠状动脉微血管功能障碍的替代品?
背景:2型糖尿病(T2D)合并蛋白尿患者存在冠状动脉微血管功能障碍(CMD)。冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影(FFRct)评估的血流储备分数取决于微循环的结构和功能,并可能受到CMD的影响。我们的目的是评估无明显冠状动脉狭窄但诊断为蛋白尿的无症状T2D患者与无症状T2D且无蛋白尿的患者相比,其最低FFRct值是否更低。方法和结果:这是一项横断面研究,比较无心绞痛症状的T2D患者冠状动脉平均最低点FFRct值。T2D患者分为蛋白尿组和无蛋白尿组,蛋白尿定义为白蛋白-肌酐比值(ACR)≥30毫克/克。采用双样本Wilcoxon秩和(Mann-Whitney)检验比较两组左前降动脉(FFRct- lad)、旋支动脉(FFRct- cx)和右冠状动脉(FFRct- rca)的FFRct最低点值。无蛋白尿患者98例,有蛋白尿患者26例。在有蛋白尿和无蛋白尿患者中,FFRct-CX的平均值分别为0.86±0.07和0.88±0.0,FFRct-RCA的平均值分别为0.88±0.05和0.88±0.07,FFRct-LAD的平均值分别为0.82±0.07和0.82±0.07,无显著差异。结论:在本观察性研究中,我们未发现FFRct受到CMD的影响。因此,它不是无症状T2D伴蛋白尿患者微血管功能障碍的替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
PCSK9 Inhibitors and Anthracyclines: The Future of Cardioprotection in Cardio-Oncology. Deciphering the Involvement of the Epicardium in Cardiac Diseases Deciphering the Intricate Molecular Bases of Atrial Fibrillation Durable Continuous-Flow Mechanical Circulatory Support Outcomes and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) versus Vitamin K Antagonists (VKAs) amongst Patients with Valvular Heart Disease (VHD): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1