The “New” American Genocide: Forced Pregnancy and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women

IF 0.4 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Peace Review-A Journal of Social Justice Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI:10.1080/10402659.2022.2109938
K. Standish
{"title":"The “New” American Genocide: Forced Pregnancy and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women","authors":"K. Standish","doi":"10.1080/10402659.2022.2109938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"F pregnancy, the result of making reproductive rights for women illegal, is an infringement of the genocide convention, a crime against humanity, and a violation of the rights of females to experience fundamental human rights and freedoms. While a 2022U.S. Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade returns the determination of the legal status of abortion to individual states, in states where a rape leads to pregnancy, the life of the mother is at stake, and access to reproductive care is illegal, a ban on body autonomy will undoubtedly result in forced pregnancies. Three international law conventions exist that address the emerging concerns regarding identity-based violence against females in the United States: the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Article II), the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Definition of Crimes Against Humanity (Article 7), and the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women (Article 1). All three prohibit discriminatory violence directed against identity groups. But it may surprise some to know that of the three documents, only two refer specifically to crimes against females, and the one that does not is the only one ratified by the United States.","PeriodicalId":51831,"journal":{"name":"Peace Review-A Journal of Social Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peace Review-A Journal of Social Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2022.2109938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

F pregnancy, the result of making reproductive rights for women illegal, is an infringement of the genocide convention, a crime against humanity, and a violation of the rights of females to experience fundamental human rights and freedoms. While a 2022U.S. Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade returns the determination of the legal status of abortion to individual states, in states where a rape leads to pregnancy, the life of the mother is at stake, and access to reproductive care is illegal, a ban on body autonomy will undoubtedly result in forced pregnancies. Three international law conventions exist that address the emerging concerns regarding identity-based violence against females in the United States: the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Article II), the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Definition of Crimes Against Humanity (Article 7), and the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women (Article 1). All three prohibit discriminatory violence directed against identity groups. But it may surprise some to know that of the three documents, only two refer specifically to crimes against females, and the one that does not is the only one ratified by the United States.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“新”的美国种族灭绝:强迫怀孕和《消除对妇女一切形式歧视公约》
怀孕是将妇女的生育权利定为非法的结果,违反了《种族灭绝公约》,是反人类罪,侵犯了妇女享有基本人权和自由的权利。而2022年的美国。最高法院推翻罗伊诉韦德案的决定将堕胎的法律地位交还给各州,在强奸导致怀孕的州,母亲的生命处于危险之中,获得生殖保健是非法的,禁止身体自主无疑会导致强迫怀孕。目前有三个国际法公约解决了美国针对女性的基于身份的暴力行为的新问题:《防止及惩治灭绝种族罪公约》(第二条)、《国际刑事法院罗马规约关于危害人类罪的定义》(第七条)和《消除对妇女一切形式歧视公约》(第一条)。这三项公约都禁止针对身份群体的歧视性暴力。但让一些人感到惊讶的是,在这三份文件中,只有两份专门提到了针对女性的犯罪,而另一份则是美国唯一批准的文件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Peace Review-A Journal of Social Justice
Peace Review-A Journal of Social Justice INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Extractivism in Mexico: Questions of Geopolitics, Geoeconomics, and Human Rights The Power of Education in a Globalised World: Challenging Geoeconomic Inequalities Navigating the Ukraine War: Unraveling the Interplay of Geoeconomics, Geopolitics and Deterrence The Role of Geopolitical Risk in Conflict Analysis: Critical Insights Competing Regionalisms in the Asia-Pacific? Versatile Sustainable Development Issues in FTAs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1