The Second Victim Phenomenon Experience of the Anesthesia Team: A Focus Group Study

Q4 Medicine Anestezi Dergisi Pub Date : 2023-04-28 DOI:10.54875/jarss.2023.60024
P. Ayvat
{"title":"The Second Victim Phenomenon Experience of the Anesthesia Team: A Focus Group Study","authors":"P. Ayvat","doi":"10.54875/jarss.2023.60024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: As a result of the negative events experienced, the patient becomes the first victim, while the healthcare provider becomes the second victim. This situation is frequently experienced in the operating room (OR) and intensive care unit (ICU). Our aim is to reveal the problems and experiences of the anesthesia personnel working in OR / ICU regarding the second victim phenomenon (SVP) and to propose solutions. Methods: The research was conducted with the qualitative research method. Focus group interviews were conducted with six volunteer healthcare personnel working in OR / ICU. The data was written down and thematic content analysis was done through MAXQDA 22. Results: 5 main themes and 21 subthemes were reached. These main themes can be counted as the frequency of experiencing SVP, the main problems, emotions/feelings, coping methods, and suggestions/requests. The anesthesia team encountered the SVP frequently and this could be due to medical, violent, or technical reasons. In this situation, they felt worthlessness, helplessness, injustice, anger, and aggression. In order to cope with the SVP, they use methods such as self-suggestion, taking a break, calming down, and sharing with colleagues. As suggestions, they demanded psychological, legal, technical, managerial, physiotherapy, peer, and academic support as well as free time, elimination of patient complaints, and increased hospital security. Conclusion: The operating room and intensive care units are the busiest departments, and the frequency of adverse events is very high. Some of the situations that cause to feel SVP are preventable problems. Being aware of what you feel and how to overcome it will increase the quality of health service delivery and reduce the burnout status of health workers. Keywords: Patient safety, anesthesia, critical care","PeriodicalId":36000,"journal":{"name":"Anestezi Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anestezi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54875/jarss.2023.60024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: As a result of the negative events experienced, the patient becomes the first victim, while the healthcare provider becomes the second victim. This situation is frequently experienced in the operating room (OR) and intensive care unit (ICU). Our aim is to reveal the problems and experiences of the anesthesia personnel working in OR / ICU regarding the second victim phenomenon (SVP) and to propose solutions. Methods: The research was conducted with the qualitative research method. Focus group interviews were conducted with six volunteer healthcare personnel working in OR / ICU. The data was written down and thematic content analysis was done through MAXQDA 22. Results: 5 main themes and 21 subthemes were reached. These main themes can be counted as the frequency of experiencing SVP, the main problems, emotions/feelings, coping methods, and suggestions/requests. The anesthesia team encountered the SVP frequently and this could be due to medical, violent, or technical reasons. In this situation, they felt worthlessness, helplessness, injustice, anger, and aggression. In order to cope with the SVP, they use methods such as self-suggestion, taking a break, calming down, and sharing with colleagues. As suggestions, they demanded psychological, legal, technical, managerial, physiotherapy, peer, and academic support as well as free time, elimination of patient complaints, and increased hospital security. Conclusion: The operating room and intensive care units are the busiest departments, and the frequency of adverse events is very high. Some of the situations that cause to feel SVP are preventable problems. Being aware of what you feel and how to overcome it will increase the quality of health service delivery and reduce the burnout status of health workers. Keywords: Patient safety, anesthesia, critical care
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
麻醉小组的第二次受害者现象经验:焦点小组研究
目的:由于所经历的负面事件,患者成为第一受害者,而医疗保健提供者成为第二受害者。这种情况经常发生在手术室(OR)和重症监护病房(ICU)。我们的目的是揭示麻醉人员在手术室/ ICU工作中遇到的关于第二受害者现象(SVP)的问题和经验,并提出解决方案。方法:采用定性研究方法。对6名在OR / ICU工作的志愿医护人员进行焦点小组访谈。记录数据并通过MAXQDA 22进行专题内容分析。结果:达到5个主题,21个副主题。这些主题可以计算为经历SVP的频率、主要问题、情绪/感受、应对方法和建议/请求。麻醉小组经常遇到高级副总裁,这可能是由于医疗、暴力或技术原因。在这种情况下,他们感到毫无价值、无助、不公正、愤怒和攻击性。为了应对高级副总裁,他们使用了自我暗示、休息、冷静下来、与同事分享等方法。作为建议,他们要求心理、法律、技术、管理、物理治疗、同伴和学术支持,以及空闲时间,消除患者投诉,加强医院安全。结论:手术室和重症监护病房是最繁忙的科室,不良事件发生的频率很高。一些导致感觉SVP的情况是可以预防的问题。了解自己的感受以及如何克服这些感受将提高卫生服务的质量,并减少卫生工作者的倦怠状态。关键词:患者安全,麻醉,重症监护
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anestezi Dergisi
Anestezi Dergisi Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
Perioperative Hypothermia and Associated Factors: A Prospective Cohort Study Evaluation of the Knowledge, Skills and Practices on Rapid Sequence Intubation of Physicians Working in Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinics in Turkey: Survey Study Indispensable for Anesthesia and Intensive Care Units: End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide and Capnography: A Bibliometric Analysis during 1980-2022 Inadequancy and Differences about the Attitudes in Pain Control of Cancer Patients: Assessment of Algology Department Acute Hepatic Injury Following Cardiac Surgery: Retrospective Observational Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1