Pelvic lymph node recurrence in high-risk prostate cancer following prostate-only radiotherapy

IF 0.3 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice Pub Date : 2021-12-17 DOI:10.1017/S1460396921000649
Sameed Hussain, Muhammad Imran Wajid, M. Omer, Muhammad Yousuf Khan, T. Maqsood, Adnan Zeb
{"title":"Pelvic lymph node recurrence in high-risk prostate cancer following prostate-only radiotherapy","authors":"Sameed Hussain, Muhammad Imran Wajid, M. Omer, Muhammad Yousuf Khan, T. Maqsood, Adnan Zeb","doi":"10.1017/S1460396921000649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction: High-risk prostate cancer is the most common presentation at our institute among patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer. Traditionally, pelvic lymph nodes were given a prophylactic dose of radiotherapy while the prostate was given a curative dose of radiation. This study aims to evaluate patterns of failure in patients who had prostate-only radiation at our centre. Materials and Methods: All high-risk prostate cancer patients who underwent radical radiotherapy to prostate only since 2014 were retrospectively analysed. Local T stage, baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and Gleason score were recorded. Bone scan and staging CT scan data were collected. Various dose levels prescribed to prostate were analysed. The follow-up records of these patients were assessed. Patients who failed in pelvic lymph nodes were recorded separately. Overall survival and failure-free survival were calculated using Kaplan–Meier curve. Results: One-hundred five patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were analysed. Only three patients developed recurrence in pelvic lymph node following prostate-only radiotherapy (PORT). Five year overall survival was 77% while failure-free survival was 64%. Forty patients had a PSA failure after a median follow-up of 62 months. Conclusions: Most high-risk prostate cancer patients who progress following hormone therapy and PORT have metastases outside pelvis. Till further conclusive evidence is available PORT can be considered as a safe option.","PeriodicalId":44597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1460396921000649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: High-risk prostate cancer is the most common presentation at our institute among patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer. Traditionally, pelvic lymph nodes were given a prophylactic dose of radiotherapy while the prostate was given a curative dose of radiation. This study aims to evaluate patterns of failure in patients who had prostate-only radiation at our centre. Materials and Methods: All high-risk prostate cancer patients who underwent radical radiotherapy to prostate only since 2014 were retrospectively analysed. Local T stage, baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and Gleason score were recorded. Bone scan and staging CT scan data were collected. Various dose levels prescribed to prostate were analysed. The follow-up records of these patients were assessed. Patients who failed in pelvic lymph nodes were recorded separately. Overall survival and failure-free survival were calculated using Kaplan–Meier curve. Results: One-hundred five patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were analysed. Only three patients developed recurrence in pelvic lymph node following prostate-only radiotherapy (PORT). Five year overall survival was 77% while failure-free survival was 64%. Forty patients had a PSA failure after a median follow-up of 62 months. Conclusions: Most high-risk prostate cancer patients who progress following hormone therapy and PORT have metastases outside pelvis. Till further conclusive evidence is available PORT can be considered as a safe option.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高危前列腺癌放疗后盆腔淋巴结复发
摘要简介:高危前列腺癌是我院非转移性前列腺癌患者中最常见的表现。传统上,盆腔淋巴结给予预防性剂量的放疗,而前列腺给予治疗剂量的放疗。本研究旨在评估在本中心仅行前列腺放射治疗的患者的失败模式。材料与方法:回顾性分析2014年以来所有仅行前列腺根治性放疗的高危前列腺癌患者。记录局部T分期、基线前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)和Gleason评分。收集骨扫描及分期CT扫描资料。分析了前列腺的不同剂量水平。对这些患者的随访记录进行评估。盆腔淋巴结检查失败的患者单独记录。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线计算总生存期和无故障生存期。结果:共分析符合纳入标准的患者105例。仅3例患者在前列腺放射治疗(PORT)后出现盆腔淋巴结复发。5年总生存率为77%,无失败生存率为64%。40例患者在中位随访62个月后出现PSA失败。结论:大多数在激素治疗和PORT治疗后进展的高危前列腺癌患者有骨盆外转移。在没有进一步的确凿证据之前,PORT可以被认为是一种安全的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice is a peer-reviewed journal covering all of the current modalities specific to clinical oncology and radiotherapy. The journal aims to publish research from a wide range of styles and encourage debate and the exchange of information and opinion from within the field of radiotherapy practice and clinical oncology. The journal also aims to encourage technical evaluations and case studies as well as equipment reviews that will be of interest to an international radiotherapy audience.
期刊最新文献
Wobbling nature of gamma passing rate as a function of calibration field sizes in patient-specific quality assurance Secondary fragmentation and relative biological effectiveness (RBE) study using Bridge SOI microdosimeter: Monte Carlo simulation Keratin-based topical cream for radiation dermatitis during head and neck radiotherapy: a randomised, open-label pilot study. Single catheter 3d volume based hybrid inverse planning optimization in IVBT can improve organ sparing – CORRIGENDUM Dosimetric case study of 3-D FiF vs. VMAT techniques in the treatment of H/N tumour
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1