Rearticulating the creative industries-STEM relationship: the case of innovation precincts in South Australia

IF 0.9 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Creative Industries Journal Pub Date : 2021-08-05 DOI:10.1080/17510694.2021.1959087
Stuart Cunningham, M. McCutcheon
{"title":"Rearticulating the creative industries-STEM relationship: the case of innovation precincts in South Australia","authors":"Stuart Cunningham, M. McCutcheon","doi":"10.1080/17510694.2021.1959087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract There is a fraught history to the relationship between creative industries policy and programs on the one hand, and on the other, innovation and entrepreneurship policy and programs, which have rarely been inclusive of creative industries, although there are developments which run counter to this neglect. But structural changes to modern economies mean that innovation policy needs to shift to accommodate creative industries. The article reviews some of the problems associated with that shift, and notes that a major innovation lever used by governments—precinct or cluster development—has had a mixed record when applied to culture. A focus on one site—Adelaide, South Australia—demonstrates that progress can be made when a clear vision is articulated of the integral role that creative industries can play in innovation policies for economic growth and infrastructure support. Six precincts in inner-urban Adelaide—ranging from pure arts to advanced manufacturing—interact to produce additionality rather than simply aggregation, enacting a productive ecosystem for both creative industries and STEM. The precincts ecology enhances practical creative entrepreneurship, acts as a conduit for the movement of talent as it seeks greater challenge and opportunity, disrupts existing norms in innovation practice; and facilitates access to new markets.","PeriodicalId":38664,"journal":{"name":"Creative Industries Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"22 - 41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17510694.2021.1959087","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Creative Industries Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17510694.2021.1959087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract There is a fraught history to the relationship between creative industries policy and programs on the one hand, and on the other, innovation and entrepreneurship policy and programs, which have rarely been inclusive of creative industries, although there are developments which run counter to this neglect. But structural changes to modern economies mean that innovation policy needs to shift to accommodate creative industries. The article reviews some of the problems associated with that shift, and notes that a major innovation lever used by governments—precinct or cluster development—has had a mixed record when applied to culture. A focus on one site—Adelaide, South Australia—demonstrates that progress can be made when a clear vision is articulated of the integral role that creative industries can play in innovation policies for economic growth and infrastructure support. Six precincts in inner-urban Adelaide—ranging from pure arts to advanced manufacturing—interact to produce additionality rather than simply aggregation, enacting a productive ecosystem for both creative industries and STEM. The precincts ecology enhances practical creative entrepreneurship, acts as a conduit for the movement of talent as it seeks greater challenge and opportunity, disrupts existing norms in innovation practice; and facilitates access to new markets.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新阐释创意产业与stem的关系:南澳大利亚州创新园区的案例
一方面,创意产业政策和项目之间的关系有着令人担忧的历史,另一方面,创新和创业政策和项目很少包括创意产业,尽管有一些发展与这种忽视背道而驰。但现代经济的结构性变化意味着创新政策需要转变,以适应创意产业。这篇文章回顾了与这种转变相关的一些问题,并指出政府使用的主要创新杠杆——区域或集群发展——在应用于文化方面的记录好坏参半。对南澳大利亚州阿德莱德一个地点的关注表明,如果对创意产业在促进经济增长和基础设施支持的创新政策中所扮演的不可或缺的角色有一个清晰的认识,就可以取得进展。阿德莱德市中心的六个区域——从纯粹的艺术到先进的制造业——相互作用,产生附加性,而不是简单的聚集,为创意产业和STEM创造了一个富有成效的生态系统。园区生态促进了实践性创新创业,在寻求更大挑战和机遇的过程中充当了人才流动的渠道,打破了创新实践中的现有规范;并促进进入新市场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Creative Industries Journal
Creative Industries Journal Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
27.30%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The scope of the Creative Industries Journal is global, primarily aimed at those studying and practicing activities which have their origin in individual creativity, skill and talent, and which have a potential for wealth creation. These activities primarily take place in advertising, architecture, the art and antiques market, crafts, design, fashion, film, interactive leisure software, music, the performing arts, publishing, television and radio.
期刊最新文献
Cultural, creative and collective recovery: exploring a creative Worker income Guarantee (CWIG) The arduous art of empowering visual artists: why the Dutch digital sales platform Patty Morgan ultimately failed Nigeria’s creative industries: issues, challenges, and way forward for the software subsector Artificial Creative Intelligence (ACI) A Writing Chance: adjusting the lens on social class and diversity in the UK publishing industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1