Clinical analysis of 36 children with typical hemolytic uremic syndrome

Abstract

Objective To investigate the clinical manifestations, auxiliary examination results, prognosis and treatment of children with typical hemolytic uremic syndrome (D+ HUS). Methods The clinical data of 36 patients diagnosed as D+ HUS in the Department of Pediatrics of Nanjing Jinling Hospital from January 2001 to January 2019 were collected, and the laboratory results including blood routine, liver and kidney function, coagulation function, humoral immunity and urine were compared before and after treatment. Results The white blood cell count[ (9.28±6.77)×109/L vs.(11.20±5.93) ×109/ L ], C-reactive protein [7.15(3.34, 29.33) mg/L vs.31.83(25.03, 39.75) mg/L], reticulocyte count [(112.49±76.25)×109/L vs. (206.49±147.99)×109/L], erythrocyte sedimentation[15.02(11.79, 22.83) mm/1 h vs.28.06(24.13, 40.52) mm/1 h] , aspartate aminotransferase[50.04(41.92, 60.11) U/L vs.62.61(54.58, 83.52) U/L], alanine aminotransferase [16.72(11.80, 24.74) U/L vs.24.54(20.30, 34.36) U/L], uric acid [(532.84±309.06) μmol/L vs.(606.64±327.23) μmol/L], serum creatinine[160.07(124.87, 221.18) μmol/L vs.200.56(160.62, 283.01)μmol/L ], blood urea nitrogen [20.74(15.77, 28.40) mmol/L vs.33.67(25.91, 45.84) mmol/L], lactate dehydrogenase [488.21(337.59, 692.82) U/L vs.1 520.68(734.24, 2 272.10) U/L ], prothrombin time [(12.14±5.89) s vs. (17.91±6.12) s ], activated partial thrombin time [(25.05±6.26) s vs.(32.38±5.49) s], fibrinogen [ (3.79±2.17) g/L vs.(5.17±3.88) g/L], D-dimer [0.92(0.30, 1.13) mg/L vs. 1.27(1.01, 1.90) mg/L ], 24-hour urinary proteinuria [ (84.05±44.19) mg/(kg·24 h) vs.(112.18±78.26) mg/(kg·24 h) ], urinary sediment [175.73(79.72, 258.66)×107/L vs. 160.38(118.68, 361.83)×107/L], N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase [25.10(18.84, 33.02) U/(g·cr) vs. 41.57(29.49, 58.61) U/(g·cr)], urinary retinol binding protein [0.35(0.18, 1.33) mg/L vs 1.05(0.66, 1.68) mg/L.] in patients after treatment were significantly lower than those before treatment, and the differences were all statistically significant(all P<0.05); patients had higher levels of red blood cell count [ (4.51±1.73)×109/L vs.(2.43±1.40) ×109/L], platelet[(126.82±78.35)×109/L vs. (85.21±69.38)×109/L], hemoglobin[(118.46±18.27) g/L vs. (62.36±16.11) g/L], and complement C3levels [(0.74±0.39) g/L vs.(0.58±0.27) g/L ] after treatment, and the differences were all all statistically significant(all P<0.05). Children with D+ HUS showed multiple system injuries.Among 36 cases, 17 cases (47.22%) had fever, 31 cases (86.11%) had abdominal pain and diarrhea, 29 cases (80.56%) had nausea and vomiting, 8 cases (22.22%) had headache and dizziness, 36 cases (100.00%) had proteinuria and hematuria, 34 cases (94.44%) had renal insufficiency, and 21 cases (58.33%) had yellow staining of skin and sclera.The auxiliary examination for abnormal results mainly included renal pathology (100.00%) (mesangial proliferation endothelial cell proliferation and swelling, and shedding of renal tubular brush borders), bone marrow pathology (100.00%) (active bone marrow hyperplasia), and renal B-ultrasound (86.67 %) (kidney injury-like sound image). Conclusions D+ HUS in children shows multiple system damage.Digestive system abnormalities are the main causative factor of D+ HUS in children, and the disease is dangerous.Therefore, early diagnosis and active treatment can improve the prognosis. Key words: Typical hemolytic uremic syndrome; Clinical analysis; Child; Treatment