Understanding Variation in Reactions to Displays of Allegiance

D. Kruger, Michele M. Day, Ailiya Duan, Anna M. Heyblom, Dóra Juhász, Stephanie L. Misevich, Camile Phaneuf, Claire M. Saunders, Peter A. Sonnega, Vibra Sreenivasa
{"title":"Understanding Variation in Reactions to Displays of Allegiance","authors":"D. Kruger, Michele M. Day, Ailiya Duan, Anna M. Heyblom, Dóra Juhász, Stephanie L. Misevich, Camile Phaneuf, Claire M. Saunders, Peter A. Sonnega, Vibra Sreenivasa","doi":"10.22330/HEB/321/017-028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sports team rivalries involve expressions of evolved psychology related to in-group loyalty and inter-group competition. ESPN ranked the University of Michigan–Ohio State University football rivalry as the greatest North American sports rivalry. Toledo, Ohio is geographically closer to Ann Arbor, MI (UM), than to Columbus, OH (OSU) and conventional wisdom holds that team loyalty is divided among local residents. Previous observational research of thousands of individuals in Toledo indicated that no one simultaneously wore apparel from the two competing teams. Inspired by these observations, a second study examined reactions to displays of mixed loyalty vs. consistent loyalty. When a research confederate wore clothing featuring both UM and OSU, he elicited more attention and reactions than when wearing equivalent outfits featuring just one of the universities. The current study examines factors explaining individual differences in attention to displays of allegiance to rival groups, whether consistent or mixed. We made several predictions for explaining variation in reaction rates based on evolved coalitional psychology. We predicted that men, young adults in the typical undergraduate age range (18-25), and those wearing university merchandise themselves will have higher reaction rates to the confederate than women, individuals in other age groups, and individuals not wearing university merchandise respectively. These hypotheses were generally supported by our observations (n = 1292). Controlling for experimental condition, reaction rates were higher overall for men, young adults, and those wearing university merchandise themselves. The highest reaction rates were by young adult men wearing university merchandise, to the mixed condition.","PeriodicalId":91082,"journal":{"name":"Human ethology bulletin","volume":"32 1","pages":"17-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human ethology bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22330/HEB/321/017-028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Sports team rivalries involve expressions of evolved psychology related to in-group loyalty and inter-group competition. ESPN ranked the University of Michigan–Ohio State University football rivalry as the greatest North American sports rivalry. Toledo, Ohio is geographically closer to Ann Arbor, MI (UM), than to Columbus, OH (OSU) and conventional wisdom holds that team loyalty is divided among local residents. Previous observational research of thousands of individuals in Toledo indicated that no one simultaneously wore apparel from the two competing teams. Inspired by these observations, a second study examined reactions to displays of mixed loyalty vs. consistent loyalty. When a research confederate wore clothing featuring both UM and OSU, he elicited more attention and reactions than when wearing equivalent outfits featuring just one of the universities. The current study examines factors explaining individual differences in attention to displays of allegiance to rival groups, whether consistent or mixed. We made several predictions for explaining variation in reaction rates based on evolved coalitional psychology. We predicted that men, young adults in the typical undergraduate age range (18-25), and those wearing university merchandise themselves will have higher reaction rates to the confederate than women, individuals in other age groups, and individuals not wearing university merchandise respectively. These hypotheses were generally supported by our observations (n = 1292). Controlling for experimental condition, reaction rates were higher overall for men, young adults, and those wearing university merchandise themselves. The highest reaction rates were by young adult men wearing university merchandise, to the mixed condition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解对效忠表现的反应变化
体育团队竞争涉及到与群体内忠诚和群体间竞争相关的进化心理的表达。ESPN将密歇根大学和俄亥俄州立大学的橄榄球比赛列为北美最伟大的体育比赛。托莱多,俄亥俄州在地理上更接近安娜堡,密歇根州(UM),而不是哥伦布市,俄亥俄州(OSU),传统观点认为,球队的忠诚度在当地居民中是有分歧的。先前对托莱多数千人的观察研究表明,没有人同时穿着两个竞争团队的服装。受这些观察结果的启发,第二项研究考察了对混合忠诚和一致忠诚的反应。当一名研究参与者同时穿着印有密歇根大学和俄勒冈州立大学图案的衣服时,他比只穿印有其中一所大学图案的衣服时引起了更多的关注和反应。目前的研究考察了一些因素,这些因素解释了个体对敌对团体忠诚表现的关注差异,无论是一致的还是混合的。基于进化的联合心理学,我们做出了几个预测来解释反应速率的变化。我们预测,男性、典型本科年龄段的年轻人(18-25岁)和那些自己穿着大学商品的人对同盟者的反应率分别高于女性、其他年龄段的个人和不穿大学商品的个人。我们的观察结果普遍支持这些假设(n = 1292)。在控制实验条件下,男性、年轻人和自己穿着大学服装的人的总体反应率更高。穿着大学服装的年轻成年男性对混合条件的反应率最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ISHE Travels to Amazon: A Narrative of a Special Issue Based on the XXII ISHE Conference, 5-9 August 2014 in Belém, Brazil The Ethologist’s Corner The Trouble With Certainty in the Study of Human Evolution Women at the “Sight” of Evolution A Lost Idea in Psychology: Observation as Starting Point for the Scientific Investigation of Human Behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1