Vibration Anesthesia for Propofol-Rocuronium Injection Pain

Q4 Medicine Anestezi Dergisi Pub Date : 2022-07-29 DOI:10.54875/jarss.2022.03274
A. Guler, N. Ozcan
{"title":"Vibration Anesthesia for Propofol-Rocuronium Injection Pain","authors":"A. Guler, N. Ozcan","doi":"10.54875/jarss.2022.03274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: Despite numerous strategies for preventing or alleviating pain associated with propofol and rocuronium injections, it remains common and distressing for patients. Application of vibration is an effective method of reducing pain during facial cosmetic injections and some venipuncture procedures. But it has been studied in limited trials for the context of propofol or rocuronium injection pain. This randomized study aims to evaluate the effect of vibration anesthesia on the incidence and severity of propofol and rocuronium injection pain. Methods: Fifty-one patients who underwent elective gynecologic operations under general anesthesia, were randomized, into two groups. On the dorsal side of the hand, a 20 G intravenous cannula was inserted. In Group V (n=25), propofol and rocuronium was administered following 1 minute of pre-treatment with the vibration device on the intravenous catheter trace. In Group C (n=26) vibration was not applied before drug administration. Propofol pain was recorded according to McCrirrick and Hunter scale and rocuronium injection pain response was evaluated with a four-point scale. Results: The number of patients who experienced propofol injection pain, in the vibration group was significantly lower than in the control group (p=0.007). The percentage of pain free patients in Group V was 88%, whereas 46% in Group C. The incidence of withdrawal movements associated with rocuronium injection pain was also significantly lower in Group V (p=0.043). Percentage of pain free patients in Group V was 28% whereas 3.8% in Group C. Conclusion: Vibration anesthesia before propofol and rocuronium injection significantly reduced the injection pain. Keywords: Injection pain, propofol, rocuronium, vibration","PeriodicalId":36000,"journal":{"name":"Anestezi Dergisi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anestezi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54875/jarss.2022.03274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: Despite numerous strategies for preventing or alleviating pain associated with propofol and rocuronium injections, it remains common and distressing for patients. Application of vibration is an effective method of reducing pain during facial cosmetic injections and some venipuncture procedures. But it has been studied in limited trials for the context of propofol or rocuronium injection pain. This randomized study aims to evaluate the effect of vibration anesthesia on the incidence and severity of propofol and rocuronium injection pain. Methods: Fifty-one patients who underwent elective gynecologic operations under general anesthesia, were randomized, into two groups. On the dorsal side of the hand, a 20 G intravenous cannula was inserted. In Group V (n=25), propofol and rocuronium was administered following 1 minute of pre-treatment with the vibration device on the intravenous catheter trace. In Group C (n=26) vibration was not applied before drug administration. Propofol pain was recorded according to McCrirrick and Hunter scale and rocuronium injection pain response was evaluated with a four-point scale. Results: The number of patients who experienced propofol injection pain, in the vibration group was significantly lower than in the control group (p=0.007). The percentage of pain free patients in Group V was 88%, whereas 46% in Group C. The incidence of withdrawal movements associated with rocuronium injection pain was also significantly lower in Group V (p=0.043). Percentage of pain free patients in Group V was 28% whereas 3.8% in Group C. Conclusion: Vibration anesthesia before propofol and rocuronium injection significantly reduced the injection pain. Keywords: Injection pain, propofol, rocuronium, vibration
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
震动麻醉治疗异丙酚-罗库溴铵注射疼痛
摘要目的:尽管有许多预防或减轻丙泊酚和罗库注射相关疼痛的策略,但它对患者来说仍然很常见,也很痛苦。在面部美容注射和一些静脉穿刺过程中,振动是减轻疼痛的有效方法。但在丙泊酚或罗库注射疼痛的有限试验中对其进行了研究。本随机研究旨在评估振动麻醉对丙泊酚和罗库注射疼痛发生率和严重程度的影响。方法:将51例全麻妇科择期手术患者随机分为两组。在手的背侧,插入一根20G的静脉插管。在第V组(n=25)中,丙泊酚和罗库在静脉导管轨迹上的振动装置预处理1分钟后给药。C组(n=26)给药前未进行振动。根据McCrirrick和Hunter量表记录丙泊酚疼痛,并用四点量表评估罗库注射疼痛反应。结果:振动组出现丙泊酚注射疼痛的患者数量显著低于对照组(p=0.007)。V组无疼痛患者的百分比为88%,而C组为46%。V组与罗库注射疼痛相关的戒断运动发生率也显著降低(p=0.043)。V组无疼痛患者的百分比为28%,而C组为3.8%。结论:丙泊酚和罗库注射前的振动麻醉显著减轻了注射疼痛。关键词:注射痛、丙泊酚、罗库、振动
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anestezi Dergisi
Anestezi Dergisi Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
Perioperative Hypothermia and Associated Factors: A Prospective Cohort Study Evaluation of the Knowledge, Skills and Practices on Rapid Sequence Intubation of Physicians Working in Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinics in Turkey: Survey Study Indispensable for Anesthesia and Intensive Care Units: End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide and Capnography: A Bibliometric Analysis during 1980-2022 Inadequancy and Differences about the Attitudes in Pain Control of Cancer Patients: Assessment of Algology Department Acute Hepatic Injury Following Cardiac Surgery: Retrospective Observational Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1