The configuration of the Pontus Euxinus in Ptolemy's Geography

IF 0.5 4区 哲学 Q4 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY History of Geo- and Space Sciences Pub Date : 2020-04-01 DOI:10.5194/hgss-11-31-2020
Dmitry A. Shcheglov
{"title":"The configuration of the Pontus Euxinus in Ptolemy's Geography","authors":"Dmitry A. Shcheglov","doi":"10.5194/hgss-11-31-2020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. This article aims to explain how Ptolemy could have constructed a\nmap of the Pontus Euxinus (Black Sea), as described in his Geography, under the\nassumption that his sources were similar to those that have come down to us.\nThe method employed is based on the comparison of Ptolemy's data with\ncorresponding information from other ancient sources, revealing the most\nconspicuous similarities and differences between them. Three types of\ninformation are considered as possible “constituent elements” of Ptolemy's\nmap: latitudes, coastline lengths, and straight-line distances. It is argued\nthat the latitudes Ptolemy used for the key points determining the overall shape of\nthe Pontus (Byzantium, Trapezus, the mouth of the Borysthenes and the\nCimmerian Bosporus, the mouth of the Tanais, etc.) were most likely\ninherited from earlier geographers (Eratosthenes, Hipparchus, and Marinus).\nIn exactly the same way, Ptolemy's data on the circumference of the Pontus\nand the length of the coastal stretches between the key points (from the\nThracian Bosporus to Cape Karambis, Sinope, Trapezus, and the mouth of the\nPhasis, etc.) closely correlate with the corresponding estimates reported by\nother geographers (Eratosthenes, Artemidorus, Strabo, Pliny, Arrian, and\nPseudo-Arrian), which implies that Ptolemy drew on similar coastline length\ninformation. The shortening of Ptolemy's west coast of the Pontus (from the\nThracian Bosporus to the mouth of the Borysthenes) relative to the\ncorresponding distances reported by other sources is explained by his\nunderestimation of the circumference of the Earth. The lengthening of\nPtolemy's north-east Pontus coast (from the Cimmerian Bosporus to the mouth\nof the Phasis) can, in part, be accounted for by his attempt to incorporate\nthe straight-line distances across the open sea reported by Pliny. Overall,\nPtolemy's configuration of the Black Sea can be satisfactorily explained as\na result of fitting contradictory pieces of information together that were inherited\nfrom earlier geographical traditions.","PeriodicalId":48918,"journal":{"name":"History of Geo- and Space Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Geo- and Space Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/hgss-11-31-2020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract. This article aims to explain how Ptolemy could have constructed a map of the Pontus Euxinus (Black Sea), as described in his Geography, under the assumption that his sources were similar to those that have come down to us. The method employed is based on the comparison of Ptolemy's data with corresponding information from other ancient sources, revealing the most conspicuous similarities and differences between them. Three types of information are considered as possible “constituent elements” of Ptolemy's map: latitudes, coastline lengths, and straight-line distances. It is argued that the latitudes Ptolemy used for the key points determining the overall shape of the Pontus (Byzantium, Trapezus, the mouth of the Borysthenes and the Cimmerian Bosporus, the mouth of the Tanais, etc.) were most likely inherited from earlier geographers (Eratosthenes, Hipparchus, and Marinus). In exactly the same way, Ptolemy's data on the circumference of the Pontus and the length of the coastal stretches between the key points (from the Thracian Bosporus to Cape Karambis, Sinope, Trapezus, and the mouth of the Phasis, etc.) closely correlate with the corresponding estimates reported by other geographers (Eratosthenes, Artemidorus, Strabo, Pliny, Arrian, and Pseudo-Arrian), which implies that Ptolemy drew on similar coastline length information. The shortening of Ptolemy's west coast of the Pontus (from the Thracian Bosporus to the mouth of the Borysthenes) relative to the corresponding distances reported by other sources is explained by his underestimation of the circumference of the Earth. The lengthening of Ptolemy's north-east Pontus coast (from the Cimmerian Bosporus to the mouth of the Phasis) can, in part, be accounted for by his attempt to incorporate the straight-line distances across the open sea reported by Pliny. Overall, Ptolemy's configuration of the Black Sea can be satisfactorily explained as a result of fitting contradictory pieces of information together that were inherited from earlier geographical traditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
托勒密的《地理》中本都的构造
摘要本文旨在解释托勒密是如何在假设他的资料来源与我们所了解到的资料相似的情况下,如《地理学》中所述,构建出欧锡努斯桥(黑海)的地图的。所采用的方法是基于托勒密的资料与其他古代资料来源的相应信息的比较,揭示了它们之间最明显的异同。托勒密地图的三种信息被认为是可能的“组成要素”:纬度、海岸线长度和直线距离。有人认为,托勒密用来作为决定庞都整体形状的关键点的纬度(拜占庭、特拉佩索斯、博里斯滕斯河口和古罗马博斯普鲁斯海峡、塔奈河口等)很可能是从早期的地理学家(埃拉托色尼、喜帕恰斯和马里努斯)那里继承来的,托勒密关于庞图萨河周长和关键点之间海岸线长度的数据(从特拉斯博斯普鲁斯海峡到卡兰比斯角、锡诺佩、特拉佩祖斯和波斯河口等)与其他地理学家(Eratosthenes、Artemidorus、Strabo、Plini、Arrian和Pseudo-Arrian)报告的相应估计密切相关,这意味着托勒密利用了类似的海岸线长度信息。托勒密对地球周长的低估解释了托勒密的庞都西海岸(从希腊博斯普鲁斯海峡到博里斯滕斯河口)相对于其他来源报道的相应距离的缩短。普托勒米东北部庞都海岸(从西默里博斯普鲁斯海峡到Phasis河口)的延长,部分原因是他试图将普林尼报告的穿越公海的直线距离结合起来。总的来说,托勒密对黑海的配置可以令人满意地解释为将早期地理传统遗留下来的相互矛盾的信息拼凑在一起的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
History of Geo- and Space Sciences
History of Geo- and Space Sciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
10
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of History of Geo- and Space Sciences (HGSS) is to document historical facts and knowledge and to improve awareness of the history of geoscience. The knowledge of the development of geosciences and their experimental methods and theories in the past can improve our current understanding and may stimulate current research. It is encouraging for young scientists to read biographical material of historical figures in their research area. It is important as well to learn that history of science is an integrated part of the ongoing research in their research area. Another important aim of the journal is the association of historical retrospective and current research.
期刊最新文献
Conjugate aurora observations by the Gjøa and Discovery expeditions Atmospheric electricity observations at Eskdalemuir Geophysical Observatory Mehmet Ozan Sungurlu, the legendary Turkish petroleum geologist Book review: Unleashing Yahweh: Ezekiel and the Northern Lights by George Siscoe The early meteorological network of the Societas Meteorologica Palatina (1781–1792): foundation, organization, and reception
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1