Subjection of the Constitutional Tribunal to the Organs of Political Authorities in Poland After 2015: Contribution to Considerations

Bartłomiej Opaliński
{"title":"Subjection of the Constitutional Tribunal to the Organs of Political Authorities in Poland After 2015: Contribution to Considerations","authors":"Bartłomiej Opaliński","doi":"10.26399/iusnovum.v16.3.2022.31-b.opalinski","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary The article discusses the issues concerning the influence of the Polish legislative power on the functioning of the Constitutional Tribunal that started in the autumn of 2015. The analysis covers all legal acts passed between 2015 and 2017 that introduced changes in the structure and functioning of the Constitutional Tribunal and modified the status of its judges. The research made use of the innovative method devised by Professor Paweł Chmielnicki, which consists in the examination of substantial sources of law, i.e. real reasons for passing a given statute. The analysis covers, inter alia, materials developed by a group of specialists, including the author, employed by the Centre for Legislative Process Research at Lazarski University. The article shows that the changes in the Constitutional Tribunal do not serve to exercise citizens’ rights. They aim to strengthen the political authorities (the Parliament and its emanation, the Government) at the judicial power expense. It matches the general tendency visible after the 2015 parliamentary election targeted at weakening the position of the judiciary and personal influence of the legislative on this power. The activities do not follow the constitutional rule of separation of powers and are in conflict with the principle of separation and independence of courts and tribunals guaranteed by the Constitution. Taking into account the fact that authorities change in the conditions of a democratic system, the only panacea for the restoration of the shape and prestige of the Constitutional Tribunal is the change of the authorities. There will be an opportunity for that in the autumn of 2023.","PeriodicalId":33501,"journal":{"name":"Ius Novum","volume":"16 1","pages":"146 - 166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ius Novum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26399/iusnovum.v16.3.2022.31-b.opalinski","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary The article discusses the issues concerning the influence of the Polish legislative power on the functioning of the Constitutional Tribunal that started in the autumn of 2015. The analysis covers all legal acts passed between 2015 and 2017 that introduced changes in the structure and functioning of the Constitutional Tribunal and modified the status of its judges. The research made use of the innovative method devised by Professor Paweł Chmielnicki, which consists in the examination of substantial sources of law, i.e. real reasons for passing a given statute. The analysis covers, inter alia, materials developed by a group of specialists, including the author, employed by the Centre for Legislative Process Research at Lazarski University. The article shows that the changes in the Constitutional Tribunal do not serve to exercise citizens’ rights. They aim to strengthen the political authorities (the Parliament and its emanation, the Government) at the judicial power expense. It matches the general tendency visible after the 2015 parliamentary election targeted at weakening the position of the judiciary and personal influence of the legislative on this power. The activities do not follow the constitutional rule of separation of powers and are in conflict with the principle of separation and independence of courts and tribunals guaranteed by the Constitution. Taking into account the fact that authorities change in the conditions of a democratic system, the only panacea for the restoration of the shape and prestige of the Constitutional Tribunal is the change of the authorities. There will be an opportunity for that in the autumn of 2023.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2015年后波兰宪法法庭隶属于政治当局机关:对考虑事项的贡献
本文讨论了2015年秋季开始的波兰立法权对宪法法庭运作的影响问题。该分析涵盖了2015年至2017年期间通过的所有法律法案,这些法案改变了宪法法庭的结构和运作,并修改了其法官的地位。这项研究使用了paweowchmielnicki教授设计的创新方法,即审查法律的实质性来源,即通过某一法规的真正理由。除其他外,该分析包括由拉扎尔斯基大学立法程序研究中心雇用的包括作者在内的一组专家编写的材料。该条表明,宪法法庭的变动无助于行使公民权利。它们旨在以牺牲司法权为代价加强政治当局(议会及其附属机构,即政府)。这符合2015年议会选举后可见的总体趋势,即削弱司法机构的地位和立法机构对这一权力的个人影响。这些活动不符合三权分立的宪法规则,也违反了《宪法》所保障的法院和法庭的分立和独立原则。考虑到当局是在民主制度的条件下发生变化的这一事实,恢复宪法法庭的形式和威望的唯一灵丹妙药是当局的改变。2023年秋天将会有这样的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Paradox of Democratic Strengthening: Criminalisation of Political Terrorism as a Legal Discrediting Mechanism The Attack on the Protected Legal Interest: A Criminalisation Principle and an Element of the Criminal Offence? Amendment to the Rights and Obligations of a Journalist in Act: Press Law from the Perspective of Conscience Clause Key Elements of the Criminal Law Conflict System, with Special Reference to Spanish Criminal Law On the Concept of an Appellate Measure in a Criminal Proceeding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1