{"title":"The Brexit Omnishambles and the law of large solutions","authors":"P. Diamond, J. Richardson","doi":"10.1080/13501763.2023.2245425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The UK’s decision to leave the European Union (EU) in 2016 unquestionably represents a critical juncture in British politics. Yet the intervening years in which the terms of Britain’s withdrawal have been painstakingly negotiated by the UK political elite appear less of a watershed, even if there have been significant alterations in particular fields of public policy. Path dependencies have reasserted themselves derailing the process of ‘getting Brexit done’, while the constraints and unintended consequences confronting policy-makers in the polity and politics have become increasingly apparent, not least on the issue of how far in practice to pursue regulatory divergence from the EU. The framing of Brexit as a ‘critical juncture’ has fuelled unrealistic expectations while contributing towards growing disillusionment among citizens. Amidst the ensuing chaos, Brexit appears more than ever to be an omnishambles of epic proportions.","PeriodicalId":51362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Public Policy","volume":"30 1","pages":"2235 - 2250"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2245425","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
ABSTRACT The UK’s decision to leave the European Union (EU) in 2016 unquestionably represents a critical juncture in British politics. Yet the intervening years in which the terms of Britain’s withdrawal have been painstakingly negotiated by the UK political elite appear less of a watershed, even if there have been significant alterations in particular fields of public policy. Path dependencies have reasserted themselves derailing the process of ‘getting Brexit done’, while the constraints and unintended consequences confronting policy-makers in the polity and politics have become increasingly apparent, not least on the issue of how far in practice to pursue regulatory divergence from the EU. The framing of Brexit as a ‘critical juncture’ has fuelled unrealistic expectations while contributing towards growing disillusionment among citizens. Amidst the ensuing chaos, Brexit appears more than ever to be an omnishambles of epic proportions.
期刊介绍:
The primary aim of the Journal of European Public Policy is to provide a comprehensive and definitive source of analytical, theoretical and methodological articles in the field of European public policy. Focusing on the dynamics of public policy in Europe, the journal encourages a wide range of social science approaches, both qualitative and quantitative. JEPP defines European public policy widely and welcomes innovative ideas and approaches. The main areas covered by the Journal are as follows: •Theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of public policy in Europe and elsewhere •National public policy developments and processes in Europe •Comparative studies of public policy within Europe