Organizational Justice in Arab Countries: Investigation of the Measurement and Structural Invariance

IF 2.3 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Cross-Cultural Research Pub Date : 2018-12-10 DOI:10.1177/1069397118815099
H. Gadelrab, Othman Alkhadher, Said Aldhafri, Saad A. Almoshawah, Yahya M. Khatatba, F. Z. El Abiddine, Mohammed Alyetama, Said Elmsalak, Nabha Tarboush, Sarah Slimene
{"title":"Organizational Justice in Arab Countries: Investigation of the Measurement and Structural Invariance","authors":"H. Gadelrab, Othman Alkhadher, Said Aldhafri, Saad A. Almoshawah, Yahya M. Khatatba, F. Z. El Abiddine, Mohammed Alyetama, Said Elmsalak, Nabha Tarboush, Sarah Slimene","doi":"10.1177/1069397118815099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given the importance of comparing different groups in terms of perceptions of justice and justice effects, it is essential that the instrument used to measure perceptions behaves the same way across all groups. This study investigates the measurement invariance of the four-factor structure of organizational justice across nine Arab countries. Multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis is used with 2,914 employees working in the public sector to represent the variety of cultures among the Arab nations. We assess organizational justice using a measure developed by Alkhadher and Gadelrab primarily for Arab cultural perspectives of justice. This study shows that the four-dimensional model of justice is valid across the nine countries at the configural, metric, and scalar invariance. Fit indices showed sufficient to optimal fit, and difference test values were not significant across the set of the increasingly constrained confirmatory factor models. According to these results, we conclude that comparisons could be made safely on the justice latent variable level across the nine Arab groups. Moreover, justice dimension intercorrelations were found to be moderate to high and independent of cultural groups.","PeriodicalId":47154,"journal":{"name":"Cross-Cultural Research","volume":"54 1","pages":"27 - 3"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1069397118815099","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cross-Cultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397118815099","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Given the importance of comparing different groups in terms of perceptions of justice and justice effects, it is essential that the instrument used to measure perceptions behaves the same way across all groups. This study investigates the measurement invariance of the four-factor structure of organizational justice across nine Arab countries. Multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis is used with 2,914 employees working in the public sector to represent the variety of cultures among the Arab nations. We assess organizational justice using a measure developed by Alkhadher and Gadelrab primarily for Arab cultural perspectives of justice. This study shows that the four-dimensional model of justice is valid across the nine countries at the configural, metric, and scalar invariance. Fit indices showed sufficient to optimal fit, and difference test values were not significant across the set of the increasingly constrained confirmatory factor models. According to these results, we conclude that comparisons could be made safely on the justice latent variable level across the nine Arab groups. Moreover, justice dimension intercorrelations were found to be moderate to high and independent of cultural groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿拉伯国家的组织正义:测度与结构不变性研究
鉴于比较不同群体对正义的看法和正义效果的重要性,用于衡量看法的工具在所有群体中的表现必须相同。本研究调查了九个阿拉伯国家组织正义四因素结构的测量不变性。对2914名在公共部门工作的员工进行了多组验证性因素分析,以代表阿拉伯国家的各种文化。我们使用Alkhadher和Gadelrab主要针对阿拉伯文化正义观制定的衡量标准来评估组织正义。这项研究表明,四维正义模型在结构、度量和标量不变性方面在九个国家都是有效的。拟合指数显示出足够的最优拟合,并且在一组日益受限的验证性因素模型中,差异检验值并不显著。根据这些结果,我们得出结论,可以安全地在九个阿拉伯群体的司法潜变量层面进行比较。此外,正义维度的相互关系被发现是中等到较高的,并且独立于文化群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cross-Cultural Research
Cross-Cultural Research SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Cross-Cultural Research, formerly Behavior Science Research, is sponsored by the Human Relations Area Files, Inc. (HRAF) and is the official journal of the Society for Cross-Cultural Research. The mission of the journal is to publish peer-reviewed articles describing cross-cultural or comparative studies in all the social/behavioral sciences and other sciences dealing with humans, including anthropology, sociology, psychology, political science, economics, human ecology, and evolutionary biology. Worldwide cross-cultural studies are particularly welcomed, but all kinds of systematic comparisons are acceptable so long as they deal explicity with cross-cultural issues pertaining to the constraints and variables of human behavior.
期刊最新文献
Cultural Correlates of Adult Attachment Dimensions: Comparing the US and Turkey Regional Variation in Social Norms and Domestic Anti-Immigrant Hostility COVID-19 and Social Distancing: A Cross-Cultural Study of Interpersonal Distance Preferences and Touch Behaviors Before and During the Pandemic Populism and Protest Intensity: A Cross-National Analysis Relationships Between Response Styles and the Hofstede and GLOBE Dimensions of Culture in a Sample of Adolescents From 33 Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1