Pluralising power: ceramics and social differentiation in Bronze Age central Eurasia

IF 1.8 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY WORLD ARCHAEOLOGY Pub Date : 2021-10-20 DOI:10.1080/00438243.2021.1993987
Paula N. Doumani Dupuy, Elise Luneau, Lynne M. Rouse
{"title":"Pluralising power: ceramics and social differentiation in Bronze Age central Eurasia","authors":"Paula N. Doumani Dupuy, Elise Luneau, Lynne M. Rouse","doi":"10.1080/00438243.2021.1993987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Archaeological research on Bronze Age central Eurasia often recognizes ‘exotic’ materials and practices as the outcome of migration and trans-regional exchange. In this analysis, we bring together two significant datasets that have long referred to one another but have rarely conversed analytically: ‘southern’ ceramics in northern central Eurasia and reciprocal ‘northern’ ceramics in southern Central Asia. Taking the amalgamation of technical traits and cultural affiliations in these ceramics as a starting point, we argue that ‘exotic’ wares were implicated across the region in diverse systems of social power reliant on differentiation. By comparing the social contexts of our northern and southern ceramic datasets, we identify variability in the signaling of ‘exoticness’ across subregions to alternately include or exclude groups. This discussion sets up a middle ground between overgeneralizing and under-hypothesizing the socio-cultural landscapes in Bronze Age central Eurasia, by prioritizing the role of ‘exotic’ technologies in choreographing dynamic social power.","PeriodicalId":47942,"journal":{"name":"WORLD ARCHAEOLOGY","volume":"53 1","pages":"779 - 808"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WORLD ARCHAEOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2021.1993987","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT Archaeological research on Bronze Age central Eurasia often recognizes ‘exotic’ materials and practices as the outcome of migration and trans-regional exchange. In this analysis, we bring together two significant datasets that have long referred to one another but have rarely conversed analytically: ‘southern’ ceramics in northern central Eurasia and reciprocal ‘northern’ ceramics in southern Central Asia. Taking the amalgamation of technical traits and cultural affiliations in these ceramics as a starting point, we argue that ‘exotic’ wares were implicated across the region in diverse systems of social power reliant on differentiation. By comparing the social contexts of our northern and southern ceramic datasets, we identify variability in the signaling of ‘exoticness’ across subregions to alternately include or exclude groups. This discussion sets up a middle ground between overgeneralizing and under-hypothesizing the socio-cultural landscapes in Bronze Age central Eurasia, by prioritizing the role of ‘exotic’ technologies in choreographing dynamic social power.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多元权力:青铜时代欧亚大陆中部的陶瓷与社会分化
对青铜时代欧亚大陆中部的考古研究通常认为“外来”材料和实践是移民和跨地区交流的结果。在本分析中,我们汇集了两个重要的数据集,这些数据集长期以来相互引用,但很少进行分析转换:欧亚大陆中部北部的“南方”陶瓷和中亚南部的相互“北方”陶瓷。以这些陶瓷的技术特征和文化隶属关系的融合为出发点,我们认为,“外来”陶器在整个地区都涉及依赖于差异化的不同社会权力体系。通过比较我们的北部和南部陶瓷数据集的社会背景,我们确定了跨子区域的“异国情调”信号的可变性,交替地包括或排除群体。通过优先考虑“外来”技术在编排动态社会权力中的作用,本讨论在对青铜时代欧亚大陆中部的社会文化景观的过度概括和假设不足之间建立了一个中间地带。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
WORLD ARCHAEOLOGY
WORLD ARCHAEOLOGY ARCHAEOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: World Archaeology was established specifically to deal with archaeology on a world-wide multiperiod basis. Thirty years after it was founded it remains a leader in its field. The first three of the year"s quarterly issues are each dedicated to a particular theme of current interest. The fourth issue, Debates in World Archaeology, is a forum for debate, discussion and comment. All papers adopt a broad comparative approach, looking at important issues on a global scale. The members of the editorial board and the advisory board represent a wide range of interests and expertise and this ensures that the papers published in World Archaeology cover a wide variety of subject areas.
期刊最新文献
Lower Paleolithic Stone-Animal ontologies: stone scrapers as mediators between early humans and their preferred prey Projectile points, dangers and Amerindian ontologies at eastern Catamarca (Argentina) during the first millennium CE Deaths at the heart of the state: incarcerating working-class youth at Ferme Neuve of Les Douaires, France Archaeology and a case of genocide: the ‘indigenous prisons’ of Minas Gerais, Brazil Towards a political ecology of piracy in the Age of Sail
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1