Analyzing the static and dynamic dependence among green investments, carbon markets, financial markets and commodity markets

IF 1.8 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Journal of Managerial Finance Pub Date : 2023-05-08 DOI:10.1108/ijmf-09-2021-0428
E. Abakah, A. Tiwari, J. Oliyide, K. Appiah
{"title":"Analyzing the static and dynamic dependence among green investments, carbon markets, financial markets and commodity markets","authors":"E. Abakah, A. Tiwari, J. Oliyide, K. Appiah","doi":"10.1108/ijmf-09-2021-0428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper investigates the static and dynamic directional return spillovers and dependence among green investments, carbon markets, financial markets and commodity markets from January 2013 to September 2020.Design/methodology/approachThis study employed both the quantile vector autoregression (QVAR) and time-varying parameter VAR (TVP-VAR) technique to examine the magnitude of static and dynamic directional spillovers and dependence of markets.FindingsResults show that the magnitude of connectedness is extremely higher at quantile levels (q = 0.05 and q = 0.95) compared to those in the mean of the conditional distribution. This connotes that connectedness between green bonds and other assets increases with shock size for both negative and positive shocks. This further indicates that return shocks spread at a higher magnitude during extreme market conditions relative to normal periods. Additional analyses show the behavior of return transmission between green bond and other assets is asymmetric.Practical implicationsThe findings of this study offer significant implications for portfolio investors, policymakers, regulatory authorities and investment community in terms of carefully assessing the unique characteristics offered by each markets in terms of return spillovers and dependence and diversifying the portfolios.Originality/valueThe study, first, uses a relatively new statistical technique, the QVAR advanced by Ando et al. (2018), to capture upper and lower tails’ quantile price connectedness and directional spillover. Therefore, the results possess adequate power against departure from mean-based conditional connectedness. Second, using a portfolio of green investments, carbon markets, financial markets and commodity markets, the uniqueness of this study lies in the examination of the static and dynamic dependence of the markets examined.","PeriodicalId":51698,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Managerial Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Managerial Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmf-09-2021-0428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis paper investigates the static and dynamic directional return spillovers and dependence among green investments, carbon markets, financial markets and commodity markets from January 2013 to September 2020.Design/methodology/approachThis study employed both the quantile vector autoregression (QVAR) and time-varying parameter VAR (TVP-VAR) technique to examine the magnitude of static and dynamic directional spillovers and dependence of markets.FindingsResults show that the magnitude of connectedness is extremely higher at quantile levels (q = 0.05 and q = 0.95) compared to those in the mean of the conditional distribution. This connotes that connectedness between green bonds and other assets increases with shock size for both negative and positive shocks. This further indicates that return shocks spread at a higher magnitude during extreme market conditions relative to normal periods. Additional analyses show the behavior of return transmission between green bond and other assets is asymmetric.Practical implicationsThe findings of this study offer significant implications for portfolio investors, policymakers, regulatory authorities and investment community in terms of carefully assessing the unique characteristics offered by each markets in terms of return spillovers and dependence and diversifying the portfolios.Originality/valueThe study, first, uses a relatively new statistical technique, the QVAR advanced by Ando et al. (2018), to capture upper and lower tails’ quantile price connectedness and directional spillover. Therefore, the results possess adequate power against departure from mean-based conditional connectedness. Second, using a portfolio of green investments, carbon markets, financial markets and commodity markets, the uniqueness of this study lies in the examination of the static and dynamic dependence of the markets examined.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析绿色投资、碳市场、金融市场和商品市场之间的静态和动态依赖性
本文研究了绿色投资、碳市场、能源市场和能源市场之间的静态和动态定向回报溢出和依赖关系,2013年1月至2020年9月的金融市场和商品市场。设计/方法/方法本研究采用分位数向量自回归(QVAR)和时变参数VAR(TVP-VAR)技术来检验市场的静态和动态方向溢出和依赖性的大小。结果表明,与条件分布的平均值相比,分位数水平(q=0.05和q=0.95)的连通性幅度非常高。这意味着绿色债券和其他资产之间的联系随着负面和正面冲击的冲击规模而增加。这进一步表明,与正常时期相比,在极端市场条件下,回报冲击的传播幅度更大。另外的分析表明,绿色债券与其他资产之间的收益传递行为是不对称的。实际含义本研究的结果对投资组合投资者、政策制定者、监管机构和投资界提供了重要启示,可以仔细评估每个市场在回报溢出和依赖方面提供的独特特征,并使投资组合多样化。独创性/价值该研究首先使用了一种相对较新的统计技术,即Ando等人提出的QVAR。(2018),以捕捉上下尾部的分位数价格连通性和定向溢出。因此,结果具有足够的力量来反对偏离基于均值的条件连通性。其次,利用绿色投资、碳市场、金融市场和商品市场的组合,本研究的独特性在于考察了所考察市场的静态和动态依赖性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Treasury and Financial Risk Management ■Redefining, measuring and identifying new methods to manage risk for financing decisions ■The role, costs and benefits of insurance and hedging financing decisions ■The role of rating agencies in managerial decisions Investment and Financing Decision Making ■The uses and applications of forecasting to examine financing decisions measurement and comparisons of various financing options ■The public versus private financing decision ■The decision of where to be publicly traded - including comparisons of market structures and exchanges ■Short term versus long term portfolio management - choice of securities (debt vs equity, convertible vs non-convertible)
期刊最新文献
Examining the Indonesian dual banking system: an exploration of market discipline indicators CEO compensation and bank’s performance following bank-rescue Does corporate sustainability performance matter for cash holdings? International evidence Nonfinancial 8-K disclosures and individual investors' trading during earnings announcement window Corporate governance and capital structure dynamics: evidence from an emerging market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1