SARC-F Questionnaire: Rapid and Easy Tool for Identifying Physical Limitations in Hemodialysis Patients

Shohei Yamamoto, Ryota Matsuzawa, Manae Harada, Takaaki Watanabe, Takahiro Shimoda, Yuta Suzuki, Kentaro Kamiya, Shiwori Osada, Atsushi Yoshida, Atsuhiko Matsunaga
{"title":"SARC-F Questionnaire: Rapid and Easy Tool for Identifying Physical Limitations in Hemodialysis Patients","authors":"Shohei Yamamoto,&nbsp;Ryota Matsuzawa,&nbsp;Manae Harada,&nbsp;Takaaki Watanabe,&nbsp;Takahiro Shimoda,&nbsp;Yuta Suzuki,&nbsp;Kentaro Kamiya,&nbsp;Shiwori Osada,&nbsp;Atsushi Yoshida,&nbsp;Atsuhiko Matsunaga","doi":"10.17987/jcsm-cr.v4i1.74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>SARC-F is a simple questionnaire for rapidly assessing physical function and screening for sarcopenia. This study aimed to determine whether the SARC-F questionnaire is useful for identifying impaired physical function and the risk of physical limitations in hemodialysis patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and results</h3>\n \n <p>This cross-sectional study included 281 patients undergoing hemodialysis at two dialysis units. SARC-F, handgrip strength, leg strength, one-leg standing time, usual gait speed, and short physical performance battery (SPPB) score were measured. Patients were classified according to the SARC-F score (SARC-F &lt;4 and SARC-F ≥4), indicating the risk of sarcopenia. Furthermore, we defined physical limitations as handgrip strength of &lt;26 kg for men and &lt;18 kg for women, leg strength of &lt;40%, usual gait speed of ≤0.8 m/s, and SPPB score of ≤8 points. To calculate the areas under the curves (AUCs) of the SARC-F score for physical limitations, receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was performed. SARC-F ≥4 was observed in 75 (26.7 %) hemodialysis patients. The SARC-F ≥4 group had a significantly lower handgrip and leg strength, shorter one-leg standing time, slower usual gait speed, and lower SPPB score than the SARC-F &lt;4 group, even after adjusting for potential confounders (all <i>P</i> &lt;0.001). Further, SARC-F demonstrated good accuracy in identifying the risk of physical limitations (all AUCs &gt; 0.75).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The SARC-F questionnaire is useful for screening impaired physical function and for identifying the risk of physical limitations in hemodialysis patients and can be easily and rapidly administered to this patient group in clinical practice.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73543,"journal":{"name":"JCSM clinical reports","volume":"4 1","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.17987/jcsm-cr.v4i1.74","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCSM clinical reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.17987/jcsm-cr.v4i1.74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background

SARC-F is a simple questionnaire for rapidly assessing physical function and screening for sarcopenia. This study aimed to determine whether the SARC-F questionnaire is useful for identifying impaired physical function and the risk of physical limitations in hemodialysis patients.

Methods and results

This cross-sectional study included 281 patients undergoing hemodialysis at two dialysis units. SARC-F, handgrip strength, leg strength, one-leg standing time, usual gait speed, and short physical performance battery (SPPB) score were measured. Patients were classified according to the SARC-F score (SARC-F <4 and SARC-F ≥4), indicating the risk of sarcopenia. Furthermore, we defined physical limitations as handgrip strength of <26 kg for men and <18 kg for women, leg strength of <40%, usual gait speed of ≤0.8 m/s, and SPPB score of ≤8 points. To calculate the areas under the curves (AUCs) of the SARC-F score for physical limitations, receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was performed. SARC-F ≥4 was observed in 75 (26.7 %) hemodialysis patients. The SARC-F ≥4 group had a significantly lower handgrip and leg strength, shorter one-leg standing time, slower usual gait speed, and lower SPPB score than the SARC-F <4 group, even after adjusting for potential confounders (all P <0.001). Further, SARC-F demonstrated good accuracy in identifying the risk of physical limitations (all AUCs > 0.75).

Conclusions

The SARC-F questionnaire is useful for screening impaired physical function and for identifying the risk of physical limitations in hemodialysis patients and can be easily and rapidly administered to this patient group in clinical practice.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SARC-F问卷:识别血液透析患者身体局限性的快速简便工具
SARC-F是一种快速评估身体功能和筛查肌肉减少症的简单问卷。本研究旨在确定SARC-F问卷是否有助于识别血液透析患者的身体功能受损和身体限制的风险。方法和结果本横断面研究包括281例在两个透析单位接受血液透析的患者。测量SARC-F、握力、腿部力量、单腿站立时间、通常步态速度和短时间物理性能电池(SPPB)评分。根据SARC-F评分(SARC-F <4和SARC-F≥4)对患者进行分类,表明发生肌肉减少症的风险。此外,我们将身体限制定义为男性握力26 kg,女性18 kg,腿部力量40%,通常步速≤0.8 m/s, SPPB评分≤8分。为了计算生理限制的SARC-F评分曲线下面积(auc),进行了受试者工作特征曲线分析。75例(26.7%)血液透析患者SARC-F≥4。即使校正了潜在的混杂因素(P均为0.001),src - f≥4组的握力和腿部力量明显低于src - f <4组,单腿站立时间短,通常步态速度慢,SPPB评分也低于src - f <4组。此外,SARC-F在识别身体限制风险方面表现出良好的准确性(所有auc >0.75)。结论SARC-F问卷可用于血透析患者身体功能受损的筛查和身体限制风险的识别,在临床实践中可方便、快速地应用于该患者组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Predictive influence of artificial intelligence-based body composition analysis in trauma patients with pelvic injuries Issue Information A review of radiological definitions of sarcopenia in cancer The impact of low muscle mass on prognosis following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1