CIRCumcision learning experience using simulation: A pilot learning platform for safe neonatal circumcision training offered either virtually or in person

J. Dos Santos, Abdulrahman Alsabban, M. Maizels, M. Chua, Sunayna Vuppal, Emily Louca, Martin Perlmutar, Jennifer Knabl, M. Rickard, A. Varghese, A. Lorenzo, M. Koyle
{"title":"CIRCumcision learning experience using simulation: A pilot learning platform for safe neonatal circumcision training offered either virtually or in person","authors":"J. Dos Santos, Abdulrahman Alsabban, M. Maizels, M. Chua, Sunayna Vuppal, Emily Louca, Martin Perlmutar, Jennifer Knabl, M. Rickard, A. Varghese, A. Lorenzo, M. Koyle","doi":"10.3389/fruro.2023.1199194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To our knowledge, no formal training combining didactic learning, simulation, and hands-on performance is available for practitioners performing neonatal circumcision. The absence of structured training may result in avoidable complications such as bleeding and penile injury. Herein, we present the results of a pilot neonatal circumcision training platform, offered either virtually or in person.CIRCLES (CIRCumcision Learning Experience using Simulation) consist of 1. online didactic learning; 2. live simulation practice (in person or virtual coaching), and 3. clinical performance. Outcome measures included pre- and post-knowledge scores, self-efficacy questionnaires, and skill assessments of simulation and clinical performance (Likert rating). Face validity for training success was determined by an 80% passing score on the knowledge test and > 75% (mostly independent) performance.For this pilot, we restricted enrolment to seven pediatric residents and one nurse practitioner. Wilcoxon Sum Rank test for non-parametric paired samples for pre-and post-knowledge tests showed a median increase of 20 points in post-knowledge tests (p=0.011). Upon completion of the simulation training, all participants (8/8) have chosen to perform circumcision with the GOMCO clamp. Both in-person (4/4) and virtual participants (4/4) performed >75% of simulation and clinical circumcision independently. Post-training self-efficacy Z scores were higher than pre-training scores, except for the management of bleeding.The pilot CIRCLES learning shows face validity for both in-person and virtual training for neonatal circumcision. We plan to extend this platform to include more trainees and to offer them to established practitioners. The availability of formal training may ultimately reduce adverse outcomes.","PeriodicalId":73113,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fruro.2023.1199194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To our knowledge, no formal training combining didactic learning, simulation, and hands-on performance is available for practitioners performing neonatal circumcision. The absence of structured training may result in avoidable complications such as bleeding and penile injury. Herein, we present the results of a pilot neonatal circumcision training platform, offered either virtually or in person.CIRCLES (CIRCumcision Learning Experience using Simulation) consist of 1. online didactic learning; 2. live simulation practice (in person or virtual coaching), and 3. clinical performance. Outcome measures included pre- and post-knowledge scores, self-efficacy questionnaires, and skill assessments of simulation and clinical performance (Likert rating). Face validity for training success was determined by an 80% passing score on the knowledge test and > 75% (mostly independent) performance.For this pilot, we restricted enrolment to seven pediatric residents and one nurse practitioner. Wilcoxon Sum Rank test for non-parametric paired samples for pre-and post-knowledge tests showed a median increase of 20 points in post-knowledge tests (p=0.011). Upon completion of the simulation training, all participants (8/8) have chosen to perform circumcision with the GOMCO clamp. Both in-person (4/4) and virtual participants (4/4) performed >75% of simulation and clinical circumcision independently. Post-training self-efficacy Z scores were higher than pre-training scores, except for the management of bleeding.The pilot CIRCLES learning shows face validity for both in-person and virtual training for neonatal circumcision. We plan to extend this platform to include more trainees and to offer them to established practitioners. The availability of formal training may ultimately reduce adverse outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用模拟包皮环切术学习经验:提供虚拟或亲自安全新生儿包皮环切术培训的试点学习平台
据我们所知,对于进行新生儿包皮环切术的从业者来说,没有结合教学、模拟和实际操作的正式培训。缺乏结构化训练可能会导致可避免的并发症,如出血和阴茎损伤。在此,我们介绍了一个试点新生儿包皮环切术培训平台的结果,该平台可以虚拟提供,也可以亲自提供。CIRCLES(使用模拟的Circulation Learning Experience)由1。在线教学;2.现场模拟练习(亲自或虚拟辅导),以及3。临床表现。结果测量包括前后知识得分、自我效能问卷以及模拟和临床表现的技能评估(Likert评分)。训练成功的面部有效性由80%的知识测试及格率和>75%(大部分是独立的)表现决定。在这个试点中,我们将注册人数限制在七名儿科住院医师和一名执业护士。知识前后测试的非参数配对样本的Wilcoxon和秩检验显示,知识后测试的中位数增加了20分(p=0.011)。模拟训练完成后,所有参与者(8/8)都选择使用GOMCO夹进行包皮环切。亲自(4/4)和虚拟参与者(4/4。训练后的自我效能Z得分高于训练前的得分,但出血的处理除外。CIRCLES试点学习显示了新生儿包皮环切术的面对面和虚拟培训的有效性。我们计划将这个平台扩展到更多的受训人员,并将他们提供给知名从业者。正规培训的提供可能最终减少不良后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reducing time from presentation to surgical intervention for testicular torsion: implementation of a quality improvement protocol Clinical and environmental considerations for neonatal, office-based circumcisions compared with operative circumcisions Case report: Para-testicular spindle cell lipoma suspected of well-differentiated liposarcoma Lights and shadows on local recurrence after renal surgery: when, why and how to manage Long-term follow-up results of prostate capsule-sparing and nerve-sparing radical cystectomy with neobladder: a single-center retrospective analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1