Assessing concussion knowledge and awareness in faculty and staff in a collegiate setting

Rebecca L. Mokris, A. Kessler, Kathleen Williams, John D. Ranney, J. Webster, K. Stauffer
{"title":"Assessing concussion knowledge and awareness in faculty and staff in a collegiate setting","authors":"Rebecca L. Mokris, A. Kessler, Kathleen Williams, John D. Ranney, J. Webster, K. Stauffer","doi":"10.1177/2059700219870920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose To examine faculty and academic support staff members’ awareness and knowledge regarding concussions. Design Cross-sectional, web-based questionnaire. Setting Division II collegiate setting. Subjects A total of 123 collegiate faculty, administrative and academic support staff participated in the study. Measure(s): Participants completed the Faculty and Staff Concussion Awareness and Knowledge Survey. Analysis: Descriptive statistics were compiled for demographic information within the survey. Analysis of variance was performed on concussion awareness and concussion knowledge survey questions. Results The majority of the sample had teaching responsibilities in the University (75%). There was a significant effect of college departments within the university on individuals’ level of awareness (F (5, 117) = 9.74, p < .001). The Athletics department scored the highest in awareness of concussion symptomology, while the Business department scored the lowest. Females demonstrated significantly more awareness of concussion symptoms than males (F (1, 121) = 10.488, p = .002). University department significantly impacted knowledge of concussion treatments (F (5, 117) = 3.67, p < .004). The Health Sciences department scored the highest in knowledge of concussion treatments, while the Business department scored the lowest. Past experience with academic accommodations was associated with respondents’ knowledge of concussion treatment (F (1, 121) = 4.046, p = .047). Conclusions Concussion management in a collegiate setting should include the faculty and academic support staff. Colleges and Universities should consider educational programming regarding etiology and recovery from concussions for effective management when student experience a concussion.","PeriodicalId":92541,"journal":{"name":"Journal of concussion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2059700219870920","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of concussion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2059700219870920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose To examine faculty and academic support staff members’ awareness and knowledge regarding concussions. Design Cross-sectional, web-based questionnaire. Setting Division II collegiate setting. Subjects A total of 123 collegiate faculty, administrative and academic support staff participated in the study. Measure(s): Participants completed the Faculty and Staff Concussion Awareness and Knowledge Survey. Analysis: Descriptive statistics were compiled for demographic information within the survey. Analysis of variance was performed on concussion awareness and concussion knowledge survey questions. Results The majority of the sample had teaching responsibilities in the University (75%). There was a significant effect of college departments within the university on individuals’ level of awareness (F (5, 117) = 9.74, p < .001). The Athletics department scored the highest in awareness of concussion symptomology, while the Business department scored the lowest. Females demonstrated significantly more awareness of concussion symptoms than males (F (1, 121) = 10.488, p = .002). University department significantly impacted knowledge of concussion treatments (F (5, 117) = 3.67, p < .004). The Health Sciences department scored the highest in knowledge of concussion treatments, while the Business department scored the lowest. Past experience with academic accommodations was associated with respondents’ knowledge of concussion treatment (F (1, 121) = 4.046, p = .047). Conclusions Concussion management in a collegiate setting should include the faculty and academic support staff. Colleges and Universities should consider educational programming regarding etiology and recovery from concussions for effective management when student experience a concussion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在大学环境中评估教职员工的脑震荡知识和意识
目的检查教员和学术支持人员对脑震荡的认识和知识。设计基于网络的横断面调查问卷。设置第二庭合议庭设置。受试者共有123名学院教员、行政和学术支持人员参与了这项研究。措施:参与者完成了教职员工脑震荡意识和知识调查。分析:对调查中的人口统计信息进行了描述性统计。对脑震荡意识和脑震荡知识调查问题进行方差分析。结果绝大多数被调查者(75%)在本校从事教学工作。大学内部的学院部门对个人的意识水平有显著影响(F(5117) = 9.74,p < .001)。体育部门在脑震荡症状意识方面得分最高,而商务部门得分最低。女性对脑震荡症状的意识明显高于男性(F(1211) = 10.488,第页 = .002)。大学部显著影响脑震荡治疗知识(F(5117) = 3.67,p < .004)。健康科学部门在脑震荡治疗知识方面得分最高,而商业部门得分最低。过去的学术住宿经验与受访者对脑震荡治疗的了解有关(F(1211) = 4.046,p = .047)。结论高校脑震荡管理应包括教职员工和学术支持人员。学院和大学应考虑制定有关脑震荡病因和恢复的教育计划,以便在学生经历脑震荡时进行有效管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Do concussed and non-concussed head trauma individuals have similar symptoms? A retrospective chart review of chronic post-concussive symptomatology Providing a clearer insight into how sport-related concussion and physical pain impact mental health, cognition, and quality of life Parents’/guardians’ experiences with their adolescents’ prolonged recovery from a sport-related concussion A mixed methods investigation into athletic trainer and dietitian's nutrition practices for sport-related concussion patients Using eye-tracking technology to measure cognitive function in mild traumatic brain injury: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1