Evaluation of two sample preparation methods for the determination of cadmium, nickel and lead in natural foods by Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry

Q2 Multidisciplinary Universitas Scientiarum Pub Date : 2019-11-12 DOI:10.11144/javeriana.sc24-3.eots
David Romero-Estévez, G. Yánez-Jácome, Karina Simbaña-Farinango, Pamela Y. Vélez-Terreros, H. Navarrete
{"title":"Evaluation of two sample preparation methods for the determination of cadmium, nickel and lead in natural foods by Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry","authors":"David Romero-Estévez, G. Yánez-Jácome, Karina Simbaña-Farinango, Pamela Y. Vélez-Terreros, H. Navarrete","doi":"10.11144/javeriana.sc24-3.eots","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental pollution allows heavy metals to interact with ecosystems, bioaccumulating and passing through the food chain. Animals and human scan consume contaminated species and reach toxic and harmful concentrations in their organisms. While there are international regulatory frameworks for heavy metal contents, these are not always known or suitable for local conditions. This situation calls for the development of locally-applicable analytical methods for the determination of heavy metal concentrations in common vegetal and animal food products. Two established methods (AOAC999.11, based on sample drying and calcination, and IPNAC-06-00, based on microwave-assisted acid digestion) were comparatively tested at the CESAQ-PUCE laboratory in Quito, Ecuador, to determine their suitability. Sample matrices used were non industrial, non-organic tomato, lettuce, and beef commonly found in local markets. Heavy metals tested were cadmium, nickel, and lead. Test guidelines and comparative parameters were based on AOAC(2002) and included quantification limits, repeatability variation coefficients, intermediate precision percentages, accuracy and calculated expanded uncertainties. Unlike method AOAC999.11, method IPNAC 06-00 performance for all parameters was with in the range of recommended expected values as per AOAC, and was therefore deemed more suitable to be applied under the local CESAQ-PUCE laboratory conditions. The validation of method IPNAC-06-00 demonstrated its local applicability. In addition, IPNAC 06-00 can beused by similar laboratories to assess contaminants concentrations and improve the base line information concerning human exposure to toxic metals.","PeriodicalId":39200,"journal":{"name":"Universitas Scientiarum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11144/javeriana.sc24-3.eots","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universitas Scientiarum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.sc24-3.eots","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Environmental pollution allows heavy metals to interact with ecosystems, bioaccumulating and passing through the food chain. Animals and human scan consume contaminated species and reach toxic and harmful concentrations in their organisms. While there are international regulatory frameworks for heavy metal contents, these are not always known or suitable for local conditions. This situation calls for the development of locally-applicable analytical methods for the determination of heavy metal concentrations in common vegetal and animal food products. Two established methods (AOAC999.11, based on sample drying and calcination, and IPNAC-06-00, based on microwave-assisted acid digestion) were comparatively tested at the CESAQ-PUCE laboratory in Quito, Ecuador, to determine their suitability. Sample matrices used were non industrial, non-organic tomato, lettuce, and beef commonly found in local markets. Heavy metals tested were cadmium, nickel, and lead. Test guidelines and comparative parameters were based on AOAC(2002) and included quantification limits, repeatability variation coefficients, intermediate precision percentages, accuracy and calculated expanded uncertainties. Unlike method AOAC999.11, method IPNAC 06-00 performance for all parameters was with in the range of recommended expected values as per AOAC, and was therefore deemed more suitable to be applied under the local CESAQ-PUCE laboratory conditions. The validation of method IPNAC-06-00 demonstrated its local applicability. In addition, IPNAC 06-00 can beused by similar laboratories to assess contaminants concentrations and improve the base line information concerning human exposure to toxic metals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
石墨炉原子吸收分光光度法测定天然食品中镉、镍、铅两种制样方法的评价
环境污染使重金属与生态系统相互作用,通过生物积累和食物链传递。动物和人类会消耗被污染的物种,并在其有机体中达到有毒和有害的浓度。虽然有关于重金属含量的国际监管框架,但这些框架并不总是为人所知或适合当地条件。这种情况要求开发适用于当地的分析方法,以测定常见植物和动物食品中的重金属浓度。在厄瓜多尔基多的CESAQ-PUCE实验室对两种已建立的方法(基于样品干燥和煅烧的AOAC999.11和基于微波辅助酸消化的IPNAC-06-00)进行了比较测试,以确定它们的适用性。使用的样品基质是当地市场上常见的非工业、非有机番茄、生菜和牛肉。测试的重金属有镉、镍和铅。试验指南和比较参数基于AOAC(2002),包括定量限、重复性变异系数、中间精密度百分比、准确度和计算的扩展不确定度。与AOAC999.11方法不同,IPNAC 06-00方法对所有参数的性能都在AOAC推荐的期望值范围内,因此认为更适合在当地CESAQ-PUCE实验室条件下应用。IPNAC-06-00方法的验证证明了其局部适用性。此外,类似的实验室可以使用IPNAC 06-00来评估污染物浓度,并改进关于人体接触有毒金属的基线资料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Universitas Scientiarum
Universitas Scientiarum Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Development of a Bioreactor-Based Model for low-density polyethylene (LDPE) Biodegradation by Aspergillus brasiliensis Optimization of a novel Renealmia ligulata (Zingiberaceae) essential oil extraction method through microwave-assisted hydrodistillation Avoidance Spectrum of Alexandroff Spaces Study of a lytic bacteriophage as a tool for the control of Salmonella Gallinarum in layer poultry Genetic Editing with CRISPR Cas9: recent Biomedical and Biotechnological Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1