Cijena u ponudi za preuzimanje

Q4 Social Sciences Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.3935/zpfz.72.12.13
NIna Tepeš
{"title":"Cijena u ponudi za preuzimanje","authors":"NIna Tepeš","doi":"10.3935/zpfz.72.12.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rules relating to equitable price to be offered in takeover bid represent corner stone of takeover regulation. They aim to achieve an adequate protection of the minority shareholders and sustain effectiveness of capital market, particularly regarding its allocative function. Relevant criteria and their application depend on whether the offeror and/or persons acting in concert with him acquired target company’s voting shares in the period preceding the obligation to publish takeover bid, period from publishing of the bid until its closure for acceptance or period following closure of the takeover bid. As Croatian law departs from solutions adopted in member states that otherwise serve as legislative role models, as well as from certain solutions provided by European instruments, paper proposes teleological interpretation of Art. 16 of Croatian Law on taking over of joint stock companies. By considering the goals of the equitable price rule and internal interconnection with other regulations pertaining to takeover process, special emphasis is given to the precise determination of the moment when the offeror acquires voting shares. Such an approach aims to minimize existing legislative inconsistencies, which often relate to either faulty drafting or legislative intentions aiming to provide an autonomous solution that serves presumed particularities of Croatian capital market.","PeriodicalId":34908,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.72.12.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rules relating to equitable price to be offered in takeover bid represent corner stone of takeover regulation. They aim to achieve an adequate protection of the minority shareholders and sustain effectiveness of capital market, particularly regarding its allocative function. Relevant criteria and their application depend on whether the offeror and/or persons acting in concert with him acquired target company’s voting shares in the period preceding the obligation to publish takeover bid, period from publishing of the bid until its closure for acceptance or period following closure of the takeover bid. As Croatian law departs from solutions adopted in member states that otherwise serve as legislative role models, as well as from certain solutions provided by European instruments, paper proposes teleological interpretation of Art. 16 of Croatian Law on taking over of joint stock companies. By considering the goals of the equitable price rule and internal interconnection with other regulations pertaining to takeover process, special emphasis is given to the precise determination of the moment when the offeror acquires voting shares. Such an approach aims to minimize existing legislative inconsistencies, which often relate to either faulty drafting or legislative intentions aiming to provide an autonomous solution that serves presumed particularities of Croatian capital market.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
收购要约价格
有关收购要约中公平价格的规定是收购监管的基石。它们旨在实现对少数股东的充分保护,并维持资本市场的有效性,特别是在其配置功能方面。相关标准及其适用取决于要约人和/或与其一致行动的人是否在发布收购要约的义务之前的期间、从发布要约到其被接受关闭的期间或收购要约关闭后的期间收购了目标公司的有表决权股份。由于克罗地亚法律不同于成员国通过的作为立法榜样的解决方案,也不同于欧洲文书提供的某些解决方案,本文对克罗地亚关于接管股份公司的法律第16条提出了目的论解释。通过考虑公平价格规则的目标以及与收购过程相关的其他法规的内部联系,特别强调了准确确定要约人收购有表决权股份的时刻。这种方法旨在尽量减少现有的立法不一致,这些不一致往往与起草错误或立法意图有关,目的是提供一种自主的解决方案,服务于克罗地亚资本市场的假定特殊性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Obiteljsko nasilje u svjetlu penalnog populizma Izazovi posebnog dijela kaznenog prava zbog razvoja umjetne inteligencije uz poseban osvrt na hrvatsko kazneno pravo O sukobu načela transparentnosti i prava na tajnost podataka u pravu javne nabave Republike Hrvatske Ovrha na virtualnim valutama Socijalne i ekonomske odredbe u pravnom poretku Banovine Hrvatske
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1