Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination Among Health Care Workers in India

IF 0.2 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Indian Journal of Community Health Pub Date : 2023-03-31 DOI:10.47203/ijch.2023.v35i01.016
N. Tiwari, Ankita Goyal, Mukesh Sharma, D. Kumar, C. Yadav, A. Gite
{"title":"Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination Among Health Care Workers in India","authors":"N. Tiwari, Ankita Goyal, Mukesh Sharma, D. Kumar, C. Yadav, A. Gite","doi":"10.47203/ijch.2023.v35i01.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 has been spread almost all over the world in the last two years, including in India. Vaccines are a critical tool in the battle against COVID-19, and India has flagged the largest vaccination drive on 16 January 2021. Although public acceptance was varying, which can lead to non-acceptance.\nAim & Objective: To estimate an acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine and its associated factors.\nSettings and Design: An analytical cross-sectional study among health care workers in India\n \nMethods & Material: It was conducted using a validated, self-administrated online survey questionnaire, and data were analyzed using SPSS 23 version. The outcome variable was healthcare workers’ acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine.\nResults: A total of 450 HCWs participated, including 205(45.6%) women and 245(54.4%) men. A total of 270 (60%) subjects will accept vaccines, while 33.3% were unwilling to accept and wait for vaccines. Male gender (OR=3.14), being married and experienced (OR=11.49), vaccine effectiveness (OR=6.4), vaccine safety (OR=3.4), and past history (OR=2.28) were significantly associated. On applying logistic regression for associated factors, gender (B= -1.145, S.E.= 0.200, Wald 32.748), being married (B= -1.482, S.E.= 0.216, Wald 46.937), for experienced (B= -0.865, S.E.= 0.200, effectiveness (B= -1.856, S.E.= 0.245, Wald 57.431), Safety (B= -1.224, S.E.= 0.202, Wald 36.633) and past history (B= -0.357, S.E.= 0.248, Wald 2.071) found significant. Recommendation: Proper information is crucial and healthcare workers’ attitudes about vaccines are an important factor for acceptance and recommendation of the vaccine to the public for population-wide coverage.","PeriodicalId":13363,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Community Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47203/ijch.2023.v35i01.016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 has been spread almost all over the world in the last two years, including in India. Vaccines are a critical tool in the battle against COVID-19, and India has flagged the largest vaccination drive on 16 January 2021. Although public acceptance was varying, which can lead to non-acceptance. Aim & Objective: To estimate an acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine and its associated factors. Settings and Design: An analytical cross-sectional study among health care workers in India   Methods & Material: It was conducted using a validated, self-administrated online survey questionnaire, and data were analyzed using SPSS 23 version. The outcome variable was healthcare workers’ acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine. Results: A total of 450 HCWs participated, including 205(45.6%) women and 245(54.4%) men. A total of 270 (60%) subjects will accept vaccines, while 33.3% were unwilling to accept and wait for vaccines. Male gender (OR=3.14), being married and experienced (OR=11.49), vaccine effectiveness (OR=6.4), vaccine safety (OR=3.4), and past history (OR=2.28) were significantly associated. On applying logistic regression for associated factors, gender (B= -1.145, S.E.= 0.200, Wald 32.748), being married (B= -1.482, S.E.= 0.216, Wald 46.937), for experienced (B= -0.865, S.E.= 0.200, effectiveness (B= -1.856, S.E.= 0.245, Wald 57.431), Safety (B= -1.224, S.E.= 0.202, Wald 36.633) and past history (B= -0.357, S.E.= 0.248, Wald 2.071) found significant. Recommendation: Proper information is crucial and healthcare workers’ attitudes about vaccines are an important factor for acceptance and recommendation of the vaccine to the public for population-wide coverage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度医护人员对COVID-19疫苗的接受程度
背景:在过去两年中,2019年冠状病毒病几乎在世界各地传播,包括印度。疫苗是抗击COVID-19的关键工具,印度已于2021年1月16日发起了最大规模的疫苗接种活动。虽然公众的接受程度是不同的,这可能导致不接受。目的与目的:了解新冠肺炎疫苗的接受程度及其相关因素。背景和设计:一项针对印度卫生保健工作者的分析性横断面研究方法和材料:采用一份经过验证的、自我管理的在线调查问卷进行,数据使用SPSS 23版进行分析。结果变量是医护人员对COVID-19疫苗的接受程度。结果:共有450名医护人员参与,其中女性205人(45.6%),男性245人(54.4%)。270名(60%)受试者将接受疫苗接种,33.3%的受试者不愿意接受并等待疫苗接种。男性(OR=3.14)、已婚和有经验(OR=11.49)、疫苗有效性(OR=6.4)、疫苗安全性(OR=3.4)和既往史(OR=2.28)显著相关。对相关因素应用logistic回归,性别(B= -1.145, S.E.= 0.200, Wald 32.748)、婚姻(B= -1.482, S.E.= 0.216, Wald 46.937)、经验(B= -0.865, S.E.= 0.200,有效性(B= -1.856, S.E.= 0.245, Wald 57.431)、安全性(B= -1.224, S.E.= 0.202, Wald 36.633)和既往史(B= -0.357, S.E.= 0.248, Wald 2.071)具有显著性。建议:适当的信息是至关重要的,卫生保健工作者对疫苗的态度是接受和向公众推荐疫苗以覆盖人口的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Community Health
Indian Journal of Community Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
期刊最新文献
Factors associated with Insomnia Severity Index among elderly participants Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene: A Global Imperative for Health Vitamin D and Calcium Levels among Women of Reproductive Age Group from Northern India Rabies elimination policy guidelines: Where do we stand? An Epidemiological study on Depression among Rural & Urban Adolescent of Moradabad District, Uttar Pradesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1