Co-investment, uncertainty, and opportunism:ex-Ante and ex-Post remedies

IF 4.5 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Information Economics and Policy Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.infoecopol.2021.100913
Marc Bourreau , Carlo Cambini , Steffen Hoernig , Ingo Vogelsang
{"title":"Co-investment, uncertainty, and opportunism:ex-Ante and ex-Post remedies","authors":"Marc Bourreau ,&nbsp;Carlo Cambini ,&nbsp;Steffen Hoernig ,&nbsp;Ingo Vogelsang","doi":"10.1016/j.infoecopol.2021.100913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Caused largely by the recent technological changes towards digitalization, infrastructure investment in network industries has become the main issue for regulatory intervention. In this paper, we study the impact of co-investment between an incumbent and an entrant on the roll-out of network infrastructures under demand uncertainty. We show that if the entrant can wait to co-invest until demand is realized, the incumbent’s investment incentives are reduced, and total coverage can be lower than in a benchmark with earlier co-investment. We consider two remedies to correct these distortions: (i) co-investment options purchased <em>ex ante</em> by the entrant from the incumbent, and (ii) risk premia paid <em>ex post</em> by the entrant. We show that co-investment options cannot fully reestablish total coverage, while premia can do so in most cases, though at the cost of less entry. Finally, we show that an appropriate combination of <em>ex-ante</em> and <em>ex-post</em> remedies can improve welfare.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47029,"journal":{"name":"Information Economics and Policy","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 100913"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2021.100913","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Economics and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167624521000019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Caused largely by the recent technological changes towards digitalization, infrastructure investment in network industries has become the main issue for regulatory intervention. In this paper, we study the impact of co-investment between an incumbent and an entrant on the roll-out of network infrastructures under demand uncertainty. We show that if the entrant can wait to co-invest until demand is realized, the incumbent’s investment incentives are reduced, and total coverage can be lower than in a benchmark with earlier co-investment. We consider two remedies to correct these distortions: (i) co-investment options purchased ex ante by the entrant from the incumbent, and (ii) risk premia paid ex post by the entrant. We show that co-investment options cannot fully reestablish total coverage, while premia can do so in most cases, though at the cost of less entry. Finally, we show that an appropriate combination of ex-ante and ex-post remedies can improve welfare.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共同投资、不确定性和机会主义:事前和事后补救
网络产业的基础设施投资已成为监管干预的主要问题,这主要是由于最近的数字化技术变革造成的。本文研究了在需求不确定的情况下,既有企业和进入企业共同投资对网络基础设施部署的影响。研究表明,如果进入者可以等到需求实现后再进行共同投资,则在位者的投资激励将减少,并且总覆盖范围可能低于早期共同投资的基准。我们考虑了两种补救措施来纠正这些扭曲:(i)由进入者事先从在位者那里购买的共同投资期权,以及(ii)由进入者事后支付的风险溢价。我们表明,共同投资方案不能完全重建总覆盖率,而保费在大多数情况下可以做到这一点,尽管以较少的进入为代价。最后,我们证明了事前和事后救济的适当结合可以改善福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
10.70%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: IEP is an international journal that aims to publish peer-reviewed policy-oriented research about the production, distribution and use of information, including these subjects: the economics of the telecommunications, mass media, and other information industries, the economics of innovation and intellectual property, the role of information in economic development, and the role of information and information technology in the functioning of markets. The purpose of the journal is to provide an interdisciplinary and international forum for theoretical and empirical research that addresses the needs of other researchers, government, and professionals who are involved in the policy-making process. IEP publishes research papers, short contributions, and surveys.
期刊最新文献
Three things about mobile app commissions Digital payment systems in emerging economies: Lessons from Kenya, India, Brazil, and Peru “I don't care about cookies!” data disclosure and time-inconsistent users Algorithms in the marketplace: An empirical analysis of automated pricing in e-commerce Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1