Disparate continental scale patterns in floral host breadth of Australian colletid bees (Colletidae: Hymenoptera)

IF 2.4 3区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY Apidologie Pub Date : 2023-02-28 DOI:10.1007/s13592-023-00996-z
Patricia S. Slattery, Ben A. Parslow, Michael S. Y. Lee, Michael Batley, Ken L. Walker, Michael P. Schwarz
{"title":"Disparate continental scale patterns in floral host breadth of Australian colletid bees (Colletidae: Hymenoptera)","authors":"Patricia S. Slattery,&nbsp;Ben A. Parslow,&nbsp;Michael S. Y. Lee,&nbsp;Michael Batley,&nbsp;Ken L. Walker,&nbsp;Michael P. Schwarz","doi":"10.1007/s13592-023-00996-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Plant-bee networks are rarely, if ever, studied quantitatively at continental scales, yet these have the potential to inform how biota and ecosystems are assembled beyond narrower regional biomes. The short-tongued bee family Colletidae comprises the major component of bee diversity in Australia, with three key subfamilies: the Neopasiphaeinae, Hylaeinae, and Euryglossinae. We use museum data (&gt; 27,000 records) to record binary interactions between these bees (from each of these subfamilies, resolved to subgenera) and plants (resolved to genera). The resulting networks were analysed using bipartite graphs and associated indices of network structure. The three bee subfamilies showed markedly different network structures with their floral hosts. Euryglossinae had strong interactions with Myrtaceae and an otherwise relatively narrow host breadth, Neopasiphaeinae had little signal of host specialisation above genera and a very broad host breadth, and Hylaeinae appeared intermediate in network structure. Furthermore, Euryglossinae is more speciose within Australia (404 species, or ~ 25% of described Australian bee fauna) than Hylaeinae and Neopasiphaeinae, but these differences do not correspond to the stem ages of the three subfamilies, suggesting that time-since-origin does not explain bee species diversity or floral host breadth. Patterns of host breadth persist after rarefaction analyses that correct for differing numbers of observation records. We suggest that visitation networks could be influenced by evolutionary constraints to expansion of floral host breadth, but it is also possible that many bee-plant interactions are shaped by bees exploiting floral traits that are driven by non-bee fauna operating at large biogeographical scales.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8078,"journal":{"name":"Apidologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13592-023-00996-z.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apidologie","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13592-023-00996-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Plant-bee networks are rarely, if ever, studied quantitatively at continental scales, yet these have the potential to inform how biota and ecosystems are assembled beyond narrower regional biomes. The short-tongued bee family Colletidae comprises the major component of bee diversity in Australia, with three key subfamilies: the Neopasiphaeinae, Hylaeinae, and Euryglossinae. We use museum data (> 27,000 records) to record binary interactions between these bees (from each of these subfamilies, resolved to subgenera) and plants (resolved to genera). The resulting networks were analysed using bipartite graphs and associated indices of network structure. The three bee subfamilies showed markedly different network structures with their floral hosts. Euryglossinae had strong interactions with Myrtaceae and an otherwise relatively narrow host breadth, Neopasiphaeinae had little signal of host specialisation above genera and a very broad host breadth, and Hylaeinae appeared intermediate in network structure. Furthermore, Euryglossinae is more speciose within Australia (404 species, or ~ 25% of described Australian bee fauna) than Hylaeinae and Neopasiphaeinae, but these differences do not correspond to the stem ages of the three subfamilies, suggesting that time-since-origin does not explain bee species diversity or floral host breadth. Patterns of host breadth persist after rarefaction analyses that correct for differing numbers of observation records. We suggest that visitation networks could be influenced by evolutionary constraints to expansion of floral host breadth, but it is also possible that many bee-plant interactions are shaped by bees exploiting floral traits that are driven by non-bee fauna operating at large biogeographical scales.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚colletid蜜蜂花寄主宽度的大陆尺度差异模式(Colletidae:膜翅目)
植物-蜜蜂网络很少(如果有的话)在大陆尺度上进行定量研究,但它们有可能告诉我们,在较窄的区域生物群系之外,生物群和生态系统是如何组装的。短舌蜂科Colletidae是澳大利亚蜜蜂多样性的主要组成部分,有三个关键亚科:Neopasiphaeinae, Hylaeinae和Euryglossinae。我们使用博物馆数据(27,000条记录)来记录这些蜜蜂(来自每个亚科,分解为亚属)和植物(分解为属)之间的二元相互作用。利用二部图和网络结构的相关指标对所得网络进行了分析。3个蜜蜂亚科与花寄主的网络结构明显不同。Euryglossinae与myrtacae的相互作用较强,寄主宽度相对较窄,Neopasiphaeinae以上属寄主特化信号较弱,寄主宽度很宽,Hylaeinae在网络结构中处于中间位置。此外,Euryglossinae在澳大利亚的种类比Hylaeinae和Neopasiphaeinae多(404种,约占澳大利亚蜜蜂动物群的25%),但这些差异并不对应于三个亚科的茎龄,这表明起源时间并不能解释蜜蜂物种多样性或花宿主宽度。在对不同数量的观测记录进行校正的稀疏分析后,宿主宽度的模式仍然存在。我们认为,访花网络可能受到花宿主宽度扩展的进化限制的影响,但也有可能许多蜜蜂与植物的相互作用是由蜜蜂利用在大生物地理尺度上由非蜜蜂动物群驱动的花性状形成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Apidologie
Apidologie 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
64
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Apidologie is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to the biology of insects belonging to the superfamily Apoidea. Its range of coverage includes behavior, ecology, pollination, genetics, physiology, systematics, toxicology and pathology. Also accepted are papers on the rearing, exploitation and practical use of Apoidea and their products, as far as they make a clear contribution to the understanding of bee biology. Apidologie is an official publication of the Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) and Deutscher Imkerbund E.V. (D.I.B.)
期刊最新文献
Mitochondrial genome heteroplasmy and phylogenomics of the stingless bee Tetragonula laeviceps (Apidae, Apinae, Meliponini) Feeding with plant powders increases longevity and body weight of Western honeybee workers (Apis mellifera) Gene flow among populations of Xylocopa frontalis (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Xylocopini) of islands and continent: is the sea a geographical barrier? Influence of nutrition on honeybee queen egg-laying Heritability and correlations for honey yield, handling ease, brood quantity, and traits related to resilience in a French honeybee population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1