Temporal Sequencing of Multimodal Treatment in Immediate Breast Reconstruction and Implications for Wait Times: A Regional Canadian Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Plastic surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-07 DOI:10.1177/22925503231152261
Karanvir S Raman, Maya Morton Ninomiya, Esta S Bovill, Christopher Doherty, Sheina A Macadam, Nancy Van Laeken, Kathryn V Isaac
{"title":"Temporal Sequencing of Multimodal Treatment in Immediate Breast Reconstruction and Implications for Wait Times: A Regional Canadian Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Karanvir S Raman, Maya Morton Ninomiya, Esta S Bovill, Christopher Doherty, Sheina A Macadam, Nancy Van Laeken, Kathryn V Isaac","doi":"10.1177/22925503231152261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Treatment of breast cancer requires a multimodal approach with numerous independent specialists. Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) adds another layer of coordination to comprehensive breast cancer care. To optimize health outcomes for patients seeking IBR, it is essential to efficiently coordinate the temporal sequence of care modalities inclusive of reconstruction. <b>Methods:</b> In this cross-sectional study, patients undergoing IBR following complete or partial mastectomy at one health centre from 2015 to 2021 were included. Patients were categorized into two main groups defined by the first treatment modality received, namely surgery first and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Primary outcome measures were wait times for diagnostic investigations, initiation of treatment, and transitions between therapeutic modalities. <b>Results:</b> Of 195 patients, 158 underwent surgery first, and 37 underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Median wait time from first consultation to first treatment initiated in the neoadjuvant cohort was shorter by 11.5 days as compared to the Surgery First cohort (21.5 +/- 19 vs 33.0 +/- 28 days; <i>P</i> = 0.001). Twenty-three (82%) of the surgery first and 11 (38%) of the neoadjuvant cohort patients waited longer than 8 weeks for initiation of radiotherapy (<i>P</i> = 0.001). Following surgical intervention, the majority of patients failed to meet target benchmarks for transition to chemotherapy (<i>n</i> = 25, 53%) and transition to radiotherapy (<i>n</i> = 26, 93%; <i>P</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> Patients undergoing IBR may incur delays in the setting of upfront surgery and in transitioning to adjuvant therapies. In the setting of breast reconstruction, further efforts are required to achieve target wait-times in multimodal breast cancer care.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11489937/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503231152261","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Treatment of breast cancer requires a multimodal approach with numerous independent specialists. Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) adds another layer of coordination to comprehensive breast cancer care. To optimize health outcomes for patients seeking IBR, it is essential to efficiently coordinate the temporal sequence of care modalities inclusive of reconstruction. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, patients undergoing IBR following complete or partial mastectomy at one health centre from 2015 to 2021 were included. Patients were categorized into two main groups defined by the first treatment modality received, namely surgery first and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Primary outcome measures were wait times for diagnostic investigations, initiation of treatment, and transitions between therapeutic modalities. Results: Of 195 patients, 158 underwent surgery first, and 37 underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Median wait time from first consultation to first treatment initiated in the neoadjuvant cohort was shorter by 11.5 days as compared to the Surgery First cohort (21.5 +/- 19 vs 33.0 +/- 28 days; P = 0.001). Twenty-three (82%) of the surgery first and 11 (38%) of the neoadjuvant cohort patients waited longer than 8 weeks for initiation of radiotherapy (P = 0.001). Following surgical intervention, the majority of patients failed to meet target benchmarks for transition to chemotherapy (n = 25, 53%) and transition to radiotherapy (n = 26, 93%; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Patients undergoing IBR may incur delays in the setting of upfront surgery and in transitioning to adjuvant therapies. In the setting of breast reconstruction, further efforts are required to achieve target wait-times in multimodal breast cancer care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
即刻乳房重建中多模式治疗的时间排序及其对等待时间的影响:一项加拿大地区横断面研究
简介:乳腺癌的治疗需要多模式的方法与众多独立的专家。即时乳房重建(IBR)为全面的乳腺癌护理增加了另一层协调。为了优化寻求IBR的患者的健康结果,必须有效地协调包括重建在内的护理模式的时间顺序。方法:在这项横断面研究中,纳入了2015年至2021年在一家健康中心接受乳房完全或部分切除术后IBR的患者。根据首次接受的治疗方式将患者分为两组,即先手术和新辅助化疗。主要结果测量是诊断调查的等待时间,开始治疗,以及治疗方式之间的转换。结果:195例患者中,先行手术158例,新辅助化疗37例。新辅助队列从首次问诊到首次开始治疗的中位等待时间比首次手术队列短11.5天(21.5 +/ - 19 vs 33.0 +/ - 28天;p = 0.001)。23例(82%)的首次手术患者和11例(38%)的新辅助队列患者等待超过8周才开始放疗(P = 0.001)。手术干预后,大多数患者未能达到过渡到化疗(n = 25, 53%)和过渡到放疗(n = 26, 93%)的目标基准;p < 0.001)。结论:接受IBR的患者可能会延迟前期手术的设置和过渡到辅助治疗。在乳房重建的情况下,需要进一步努力实现多模式乳腺癌护理的目标等待时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Plastic surgery
Plastic surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Plastic Surgery (Chirurgie Plastique) is the official journal of the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Group for the Advancement of Microsurgery, and the Canadian Society for Surgery of the Hand. It serves as a major venue for Canadian research, society guidelines, and continuing medical education.
期刊最新文献
The Nasolabial Flap in Nose Reconstruction: Tips and Tricks Towards Expanded Usage and Optimized Cosmesis. Outcomes of Fat Grafting in the Active Versus Quiescent Phase of Localized Scleroderma. Management of Scaphoid Pseudoarthrosis Surgery with Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) Versus Axillary Block Anesthesia: Comparison of Patient Satisfaction. Breast Reconstruction Perceptions and Access in First Nations Women Are Influenced by Colonization. Home Programs are Key: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the 2022 Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Match.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1