Talk Is Cheap: Security Council Resolution 2286 & the Protection of Health Care in Armed Conflict

IF 2.1 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Daedalus Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1162/daed_a_01997
S. Bagshaw, E. Scott
{"title":"Talk Is Cheap: Security Council Resolution 2286 & the Protection of Health Care in Armed Conflict","authors":"S. Bagshaw, E. Scott","doi":"10.1162/daed_a_01997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In May 2016, as attacks on health care in armed conflicts were increasing globally, the United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 2286, demanding warring parties comply with their international obligations to prevent and address such attacks. The resolution was adopted unanimously by the Council and cosponsored by eightyfive UN member states. New data collection and public attention on attacks against health care at the time signaled that, contrary to scholarly expectation, the Council might use tools already at its disposal to ensure compliance with the resolution. Yet in the years that followed, the Security Council and states took few concrete steps to implement Resolution 2286. In this essay, we identify and analyze barriers that prevented the use of existing structures and mechanisms to influence the conduct of war. We contend that the experience of Resolution 2286 can tell us a great deal about the value of such resolutions as a response to pressing issues of humanitarian concern.","PeriodicalId":47980,"journal":{"name":"Daedalus","volume":"152 1","pages":"142-156"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Daedalus","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01997","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract In May 2016, as attacks on health care in armed conflicts were increasing globally, the United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 2286, demanding warring parties comply with their international obligations to prevent and address such attacks. The resolution was adopted unanimously by the Council and cosponsored by eightyfive UN member states. New data collection and public attention on attacks against health care at the time signaled that, contrary to scholarly expectation, the Council might use tools already at its disposal to ensure compliance with the resolution. Yet in the years that followed, the Security Council and states took few concrete steps to implement Resolution 2286. In this essay, we identify and analyze barriers that prevented the use of existing structures and mechanisms to influence the conduct of war. We contend that the experience of Resolution 2286 can tell us a great deal about the value of such resolutions as a response to pressing issues of humanitarian concern.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谈得便宜:安理会第2286号决议与武装冲突中的医疗保健保护
2016年5月,随着全球武装冲突中针对医疗机构的袭击日益增多,联合国安理会通过了第2286号决议,要求交战各方履行其预防和应对此类袭击的国际义务。该决议由安理会一致通过,85个联合国成员国共同发起。当时新的数据收集和公众对攻击医疗保健的关注表明,与学术界的预期相反,安理会可能会使用已有的工具来确保该决议得到遵守。然而,在随后的几年里,安理会和各国几乎没有采取具体步骤来执行第2286号决议。在本文中,我们确定并分析了阻碍利用现有结构和机制影响战争行为的障碍。我们认为,第2286号决议的经验可以告诉我们,这些决议作为对紧迫的人道主义关切问题作出反应的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Daedalus
Daedalus Multiple-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Daedalus was founded in 1955 as the Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. It draws on the enormous intellectual capacity of the American Academy, whose members are among the nation"s most prominent thinkers in the arts, sciences, and humanities. Each issue addresses a theme with authoritative essays on topics such as judicial independence, reflecting on the humanities, the global nuclear future, the challenge of mass incarceration, the future of news, the economy, the military, and race.
期刊最新文献
Disorders of Mood: The Experience of Those Who Have Them Rethinking Psychiatry: Solutions for a Sociogenic Crisis Two Sides of Depression: Medical & Social Indigenous Historical Trauma: Alter-Native Explanations for Mental Health Inequities The Biology of Mental Disorders: Progress at Last
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1