Moishe Postone and the Transcendence of Capitalism

IF 0.4 Q1 HISTORY Critical Historical Studies Pub Date : 2020-03-01 DOI:10.1086/708010
C. Calhoun
{"title":"Moishe Postone and the Transcendence of Capitalism","authors":"C. Calhoun","doi":"10.1086/708010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"T he intellectual inquiries of Moishe Postone unfolded, as everyone’s do, from knowledge-forming interests. Some of these came in complex ways from his family and childhood. He chose not to follow his father into a rabbinical career, but his scholarly pursuits were informed both by Judaism and by antiSemitism—and clearly by scholarship. He also came to participate in what we might consider one of the most important secular extensions of Talmudic commentary, seeking to read Marx ever more deeply, in ways more adequate for our age, and in dialogue with other great thinkers of modernity like Freud, Durkheim, and Weber. As Talmudic scholars endlessly unfold meaning deemed already present in the Torah, Moishe studied Marx’s texts in pursuit of a theory that could make sense of the 1960s–70s crisis—and today’s—as well as of enduring patterns in capitalism and of the possibilities for emancipation. The project of reconstructing social theory through a deeper reading of Marx and especially his mature analyses of capitalism became Moishe’s life’s work. His reading, writing, and teaching were of course closely linked. And they were globally influential. Moishe set out to address limits in the perspective of the 1960s Left within which he had come of political age. As he recalled, as much about himself as others,","PeriodicalId":43410,"journal":{"name":"Critical Historical Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/708010","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Historical Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/708010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

T he intellectual inquiries of Moishe Postone unfolded, as everyone’s do, from knowledge-forming interests. Some of these came in complex ways from his family and childhood. He chose not to follow his father into a rabbinical career, but his scholarly pursuits were informed both by Judaism and by antiSemitism—and clearly by scholarship. He also came to participate in what we might consider one of the most important secular extensions of Talmudic commentary, seeking to read Marx ever more deeply, in ways more adequate for our age, and in dialogue with other great thinkers of modernity like Freud, Durkheim, and Weber. As Talmudic scholars endlessly unfold meaning deemed already present in the Torah, Moishe studied Marx’s texts in pursuit of a theory that could make sense of the 1960s–70s crisis—and today’s—as well as of enduring patterns in capitalism and of the possibilities for emancipation. The project of reconstructing social theory through a deeper reading of Marx and especially his mature analyses of capitalism became Moishe’s life’s work. His reading, writing, and teaching were of course closely linked. And they were globally influential. Moishe set out to address limits in the perspective of the 1960s Left within which he had come of political age. As he recalled, as much about himself as others,
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
莫伊什·波斯通与资本主义的超越
莫伊什·波斯通的智力探索和每个人一样,都是从知识形成的兴趣出发的。其中一些以复杂的方式来自他的家庭和童年。他没有选择跟随父亲进入拉比的职业生涯,但他的学术追求受到犹太教和反犹主义的影响——显然是学术的影响。他还参与了我们可能认为是塔木德注释最重要的世俗延伸之一,试图更深入地阅读马克思,以更适合我们这个时代的方式,并与弗洛伊德、涂尔干和韦伯等其他伟大的现代性思想家进行对话。当塔木德学者无休止地展开被认为已经存在于托拉中的意义时,Moishe研究马克思的文本,以寻求一种理论,这种理论可以理解20世纪60 - 70年代的危机——以及今天——以及资本主义的持久模式和解放的可能性。通过深入阅读马克思,特别是他对资本主义的成熟分析,重建社会理论的计划成为莫伊斯一生的工作。他的阅读、写作和教学当然是紧密相连的。他们在全球都有影响力。Moishe开始从1960年代左派的角度来解决他的政治年龄所受到的限制。正如他回忆的那样,关于他自己和其他人,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Colonialism, Surplus Population, and the Marxian Critique of Political Economy Hayek against Malthus: Julian Simon’s Neoliberal Critique of Environmentalism Temporalities of Emancipation: Women, Work, and Time in 1970s America Reactionaries Marching Forward: On Worldmaking and Its Enemies Enclosed Futures: Oil Extraction in the Republic of Congo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1