Evaluating the applicability of the water erosion prediction project (WEPP) model to runoff and soil loss of sandstone reliefs in the Loess Plateau, China

IF 7.3 1区 农林科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES International Soil and Water Conservation Research Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.iswcr.2023.01.003
Ruipeng Zhu , Yang Yu , Jiongchang Zhao , Dianjun Liu , Siyu Cai , Juanlong Feng , Jesús Rodrigo-Comino
{"title":"Evaluating the applicability of the water erosion prediction project (WEPP) model to runoff and soil loss of sandstone reliefs in the Loess Plateau, China","authors":"Ruipeng Zhu ,&nbsp;Yang Yu ,&nbsp;Jiongchang Zhao ,&nbsp;Dianjun Liu ,&nbsp;Siyu Cai ,&nbsp;Juanlong Feng ,&nbsp;Jesús Rodrigo-Comino","doi":"10.1016/j.iswcr.2023.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Soil erosion is one of the most serious environmental issues, especially in vulnerable areas such as the Pisha sandstone regions located in the Loess Plateau (China). In these types of reliefs, long-term studies monitoring runoff and soil loss are scarce, and even more considering the efficiency of different soil management techniques applied to reduce land degradation. In this study, seven years (2014–2020) of <em>in-situ</em> measurements of surface runoff and soil loss for different land uses (forestland, shrubland, grassland, farmland, and bare land) in a Pisha Sandstone environment at the Loess Plateau were conducted. We applied the Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) model combining the large database with the precipitation regimes. Our results showed that runoff volume coming from observed and simulated data exhibited significant differences among them depending on the different vegetation types. Runoff and soil loss were different among diverse land use types as follows: farmland &gt; grassland &gt; shrubland &gt; forestland. After conducting a calibration, we found satisfactorily simulated surface runoff and sediment yield based on precipitation regimes and land uses at sandstone reliefs. Simulation performance of surface runoff was better than sediment yield. The range of standard error of the model simulation for event and annual values of runoff were 4.71 mm and 12.19 mm, respectively. The standard error for event and annual values of soil loss were 4.19 t/hm<sup>2</sup> and 21.86 t/hm<sup>2</sup>. In the calibration group, <em>R</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> of runoff and soil loss were 0.92 and 0.86 respectively, while Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient (E) reached 0.90 and 0.85, respectively. In the validation group, the <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> for both runoff and soil loss were 0.82 and 0.56, respectively. Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient (E) were 0.77 and 0.54 for the runoff and sediment yield. We concluded that using a detailed monitoring dataset, the WEPP model could accurately simulate and predict water erosion in the hillslopes of Pisha sandstone area.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48622,"journal":{"name":"International Soil and Water Conservation Research","volume":"11 2","pages":"Pages 240-250"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Soil and Water Conservation Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095633923000035","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Soil erosion is one of the most serious environmental issues, especially in vulnerable areas such as the Pisha sandstone regions located in the Loess Plateau (China). In these types of reliefs, long-term studies monitoring runoff and soil loss are scarce, and even more considering the efficiency of different soil management techniques applied to reduce land degradation. In this study, seven years (2014–2020) of in-situ measurements of surface runoff and soil loss for different land uses (forestland, shrubland, grassland, farmland, and bare land) in a Pisha Sandstone environment at the Loess Plateau were conducted. We applied the Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) model combining the large database with the precipitation regimes. Our results showed that runoff volume coming from observed and simulated data exhibited significant differences among them depending on the different vegetation types. Runoff and soil loss were different among diverse land use types as follows: farmland > grassland > shrubland > forestland. After conducting a calibration, we found satisfactorily simulated surface runoff and sediment yield based on precipitation regimes and land uses at sandstone reliefs. Simulation performance of surface runoff was better than sediment yield. The range of standard error of the model simulation for event and annual values of runoff were 4.71 mm and 12.19 mm, respectively. The standard error for event and annual values of soil loss were 4.19 t/hm2 and 21.86 t/hm2. In the calibration group, R2 of runoff and soil loss were 0.92 and 0.86 respectively, while Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient (E) reached 0.90 and 0.85, respectively. In the validation group, the R2 for both runoff and soil loss were 0.82 and 0.56, respectively. Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient (E) were 0.77 and 0.54 for the runoff and sediment yield. We concluded that using a detailed monitoring dataset, the WEPP model could accurately simulate and predict water erosion in the hillslopes of Pisha sandstone area.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
水侵蚀预测工程(WEPP)模型对黄土高原沙质地形径流和土壤流失的适用性评价
土壤侵蚀是最严重的环境问题之一,尤其是在黄土高原的皮沙砂岩等脆弱地区。在这些类型的救济中,监测径流和土壤流失的长期研究很少,甚至更多地考虑到了为减少土地退化而应用的不同土壤管理技术的效率。在本研究中,对黄土高原皮沙砂岩环境中不同土地利用(林地、灌木林、草地、农田和裸地)的地表径流和土壤流失进行了为期七年(2014–2020)的原位测量。我们应用了将大型数据库与降水情况相结合的水蚀预测项目(WEPP)模型。结果表明,根据不同的植被类型,观测数据和模拟数据的径流量之间存在显著差异。不同土地利用类型的径流和土壤流失存在差异,表现为:农田>;草原>;灌木林>;林地。在进行校准后,我们发现基于砂岩浮雕的降水状况和土地利用,模拟的地表径流和产沙量令人满意。地表径流的模拟性能优于产沙量。径流事件值和年径流值的模型模拟标准误差范围分别为4.71mm和12.19mm。土壤流失事件和年值的标准误差分别为4.19t/hm2和21.86t/hm2。在校准组中,径流和土壤损失的R2分别为0.92和0.86,而Nash-Sutcliffe系数(E)分别达到0.90和0.85。在验证组中,径流和土壤损失的R2分别为0.82和0.56。径流和产沙量的Nash-Sutcliffe系数(E)分别为0.77和0.54。我们得出的结论是,使用详细的监测数据集,WEPP模型可以准确地模拟和预测皮沙砂岩地区山坡的水侵蚀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Soil and Water Conservation Research
International Soil and Water Conservation Research Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: The International Soil and Water Conservation Research (ISWCR), the official journal of World Association of Soil and Water Conservation (WASWAC) http://www.waswac.org, is a multidisciplinary journal of soil and water conservation research, practice, policy, and perspectives. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and promote the practice of soil and water conservation. The scope of International Soil and Water Conservation Research includes research, strategies, and technologies for prediction, prevention, and protection of soil and water resources. It deals with identification, characterization, and modeling; dynamic monitoring and evaluation; assessment and management of conservation practice and creation and implementation of quality standards. Examples of appropriate topical areas include (but are not limited to): • Conservation models, tools, and technologies • Conservation agricultural • Soil health resources, indicators, assessment, and management • Land degradation • Sustainable development • Soil erosion and its control • Soil erosion processes • Water resources assessment and management • Watershed management • Soil erosion models • Literature review on topics related soil and water conservation research
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Utilizing geodetectors to identify conditioning factors for gully erosion risk in the black soil region of northeast China Automated quantification of contouring as support practice for improved soil erosion estimation considering ridges Editorial Board Three-dimensional spatiotemporal variation of soil organic carbon and its influencing factors at the basin scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1