The Ordinal Interpretation of the Integers and Its Use in Number Theory

Nathan Hamlin
{"title":"The Ordinal Interpretation of the Integers and Its Use in Number Theory","authors":"Nathan Hamlin","doi":"10.4236/ojdm.2019.94013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author recently published a paper which claimed that an ordinal interpretation of numbers had limited applicability for cryptography. A further examination of this subject, in particular to what extent an ordinal interpretation is useful for recurrence sequences, is needed. Hilbert favored an interpretation of the natural numbers that placed their ordinal properties prior to their cardinal properties [1] [2]. The author examines ordinal uses of the integers in number theory in order to discuss the possibilities and limitations of this approach. The author hopes this paper will be useful in clarifying or even correcting some matters that were discussed in his paper of January of 2018. I was trained informally in philosophical realism, and while I think idealism too has a place, at this time in my life I believe that the weight of evidence and usefulness is more on the side of philosophical materialism. I hope this discussion will help supplement for my readers the material in Number in Mathematical Cryptography. I still maintain that a lack of clarity on these matters has hindered progress in cryptography; and it has taken time for me to better understand these things. I hope others who have interest and ability will assist in making these matters clearer. My intention was to work in pure mathematics, and the transition to an applied mindset was difficult for me. As a result, I feel most comfortable in a more middle-of-the road attitude, but have had to slowly move to a more precise analysis of the physical quantities involved. I hope my readers will be patient with my terminology, which is still evolving, and my discussion of things which are more indirectly related, and which are necessary for my expression. These are important things for the mathematical community to understand, and I hope smarter and more knowledgeable people will address my errors, and improve upon the things I might have correct. I am discussing sequences which are sometimes a use of both ordinal and cardinal numbers.","PeriodicalId":61712,"journal":{"name":"离散数学期刊(英文)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"离散数学期刊(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojdm.2019.94013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The author recently published a paper which claimed that an ordinal interpretation of numbers had limited applicability for cryptography. A further examination of this subject, in particular to what extent an ordinal interpretation is useful for recurrence sequences, is needed. Hilbert favored an interpretation of the natural numbers that placed their ordinal properties prior to their cardinal properties [1] [2]. The author examines ordinal uses of the integers in number theory in order to discuss the possibilities and limitations of this approach. The author hopes this paper will be useful in clarifying or even correcting some matters that were discussed in his paper of January of 2018. I was trained informally in philosophical realism, and while I think idealism too has a place, at this time in my life I believe that the weight of evidence and usefulness is more on the side of philosophical materialism. I hope this discussion will help supplement for my readers the material in Number in Mathematical Cryptography. I still maintain that a lack of clarity on these matters has hindered progress in cryptography; and it has taken time for me to better understand these things. I hope others who have interest and ability will assist in making these matters clearer. My intention was to work in pure mathematics, and the transition to an applied mindset was difficult for me. As a result, I feel most comfortable in a more middle-of-the road attitude, but have had to slowly move to a more precise analysis of the physical quantities involved. I hope my readers will be patient with my terminology, which is still evolving, and my discussion of things which are more indirectly related, and which are necessary for my expression. These are important things for the mathematical community to understand, and I hope smarter and more knowledgeable people will address my errors, and improve upon the things I might have correct. I am discussing sequences which are sometimes a use of both ordinal and cardinal numbers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
整数的序数解释及其在数论中的应用
作者最近发表了一篇论文,声称数字的顺序解释在密码学中的适用性有限。需要对这个主题进行进一步的研究,特别是顺序解释在多大程度上对递归序列有用。希尔伯特倾向于对自然数的解释,将其序数性质置于基数性质之前[1][2]。作者研究了整数在数论中的序数用法,以讨论这种方法的可能性和局限性。作者希望这篇论文将有助于澄清甚至纠正他在2018年1月的论文中讨论的一些问题。我接受过哲学现实主义的非正式培训,虽然我认为唯心主义也有一席之地,但在我生命中的这个时候,我相信证据和有用性的分量更多地站在哲学唯物主义的一边。我希望这次讨论能为我的读者补充《数学密码学中的数字》中的材料。我仍然认为,这些问题缺乏明确性阻碍了密码学的进步;我花了一段时间才更好地理解这些事情。我希望其他有兴趣和能力的人能够帮助澄清这些问题。我的意图是从事纯粹的数学工作,而向应用思维的转变对我来说很困难。因此,我觉得最舒服的是一种更为中立的态度,但我不得不慢慢地转向对所涉及的物理量进行更精确的分析。我希望我的读者对我的术语保持耐心,这一术语仍在发展中,我对更间接相关的事物的讨论对我的表达是必要的。这些都是数学界需要理解的重要事情,我希望更聪明、更有知识的人能解决我的错误,并改进我可能纠正的事情。我在讨论序列,它有时同时使用序数和基数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
127
期刊最新文献
Genome Sequencing Using Graph Theory Approach A Relationship between the Partial Bell Polynomials and Alternating Run Polynomials A Novel Design Method for Protein-Like Molecules from the Perspective of Sheaf Theory Solving the k-Independent Sets Problem of Graphs by Gröbner Bases Rupture Degree of Some Cartesian Product Graphs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1