Use of Packer Test Results in Hydrogeological Characterization: A Comparison of Calculation Methods for a Representative Value

IF 0.3 Q4 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Momona Ethiopian Journal of Science Pub Date : 2019-05-30 DOI:10.4314/MEJS.V11I1.4
Fethangest Weldemariyam Tesema, M. Ekmekci
{"title":"Use of Packer Test Results in Hydrogeological Characterization: A Comparison of Calculation Methods for a Representative Value","authors":"Fethangest Weldemariyam Tesema, M. Ekmekci","doi":"10.4314/MEJS.V11I1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Packer test is one of the commonly applied methods in determination of hydraulic conductivity particularly in low permeability fractured rock mass. Originally, hydraulic conductivity is defined in Lugeon units which correspond to 1 litre per minute per meter of intake section less than 10 atmospheres of pressure. Since the test is applied under different pressures, which gives the opportunity to observe the hydraulic behaviour of the rock under different stresses. Calculations of hydraulic conductivity for each step of pressure usually give different value of hydraulic conductivity. Selection of a representative hydraulic conductivity value therefore becomes an issue. The arithmetic mean is the commonly accepted value, without justifying its representativeness.  In this paper, about 75 packer tests conducted at 17 core wells at different depth with 3.5 m long test sections using double packer were evaluated. The tests are conducted at five pressures that run in three increasing and two decreasing pressures according to the recommendation of Houlsby. Hydraulic conductivity was calculated for every pressure step and evaluated to find a representative value using different methods. The representative values found by different methods is then compared. Results indicate that the arithmetic mean has good correlation with all the methods in particular it is nicely correlated with the modified Lugeon analysis for hydrogeological investigations with a correlation value of R 2 =0.91. Therefore, it is concluded that the uncertainty associated with the use of the simple arithmetic mean is within an acceptable range of error. Keywords:  Hydrogeology; Lugeon Value; Packer test; Permeability.","PeriodicalId":18948,"journal":{"name":"Momona Ethiopian Journal of Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4314/MEJS.V11I1.4","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Momona Ethiopian Journal of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/MEJS.V11I1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Packer test is one of the commonly applied methods in determination of hydraulic conductivity particularly in low permeability fractured rock mass. Originally, hydraulic conductivity is defined in Lugeon units which correspond to 1 litre per minute per meter of intake section less than 10 atmospheres of pressure. Since the test is applied under different pressures, which gives the opportunity to observe the hydraulic behaviour of the rock under different stresses. Calculations of hydraulic conductivity for each step of pressure usually give different value of hydraulic conductivity. Selection of a representative hydraulic conductivity value therefore becomes an issue. The arithmetic mean is the commonly accepted value, without justifying its representativeness.  In this paper, about 75 packer tests conducted at 17 core wells at different depth with 3.5 m long test sections using double packer were evaluated. The tests are conducted at five pressures that run in three increasing and two decreasing pressures according to the recommendation of Houlsby. Hydraulic conductivity was calculated for every pressure step and evaluated to find a representative value using different methods. The representative values found by different methods is then compared. Results indicate that the arithmetic mean has good correlation with all the methods in particular it is nicely correlated with the modified Lugeon analysis for hydrogeological investigations with a correlation value of R 2 =0.91. Therefore, it is concluded that the uncertainty associated with the use of the simple arithmetic mean is within an acceptable range of error. Keywords:  Hydrogeology; Lugeon Value; Packer test; Permeability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
封隔器测试结果在水文地质表征中的应用:代表值计算方法的比较
封隔器测试是测定水导率的常用方法之一,特别是在低渗透裂隙岩体中。最初,水力导电性是用吕根单位来定义的,即在小于10个大气压的情况下,每米进气段每分钟1升。由于试验是在不同的压力下进行的,因此有机会观察岩石在不同应力下的水力特性。对每一步压力的水力导率计算通常会得到不同的水力导率值。因此,选择具有代表性的水力传导系数值成为一个问题。算术平均值是普遍接受的值,但不证明其代表性。本文对17口不同深度的岩心井进行了75次封隔器测试,测试段长度为3.5 m,采用双封隔器。根据Houlsby的建议,测试在5种压力下进行,其中3种压力递增,2种压力递减。计算每个压力阶跃的导水率,并采用不同的方法对其进行评估,以找到具有代表性的值。然后比较不同方法得到的代表性值。结果表明,算法均值与各方法均有较好的相关性,特别是与水文地质调查的修正Lugeon分析有较好的相关性,相关系数r2 =0.91。因此,得出的结论是,与使用简单算术平均值相关的不确定性在可接受的误差范围内。关键词:水文地质;Lugeon价值;封隔器测试;渗透率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Momona Ethiopian Journal of Science
Momona Ethiopian Journal of Science MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
First occurrence of rudderfish Centrolophus niger (Gmelin, 1789) in the Edremit Bay (Northern Aegean Sea, Türkiye) with the maximum length record for Turkish Seas An Engineering Geological Appraisal of the Leakage Problem in Dora-1 Earthen Dam, Tigray: Implications for its Stability Nano-Zirconia Synthesis Methods and their Pioneering Applications in Dentistry Contribution of Participatory Forest Management Program in Non-Timber Forest Products to balance Livelihood Improvement and Conservation: a case of Sera Forest, Amigna District, Southern Ethiopia Effect of Polymerization Variables on the Electrical Conductivity of Polyaniline Functionalized Cotton Textiles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1