Public perceptions of deer management in Scotland: the impact of place of residence, knowledge and demographic factors

IF 1.3 4区 社会学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Scottish Geographical Journal Pub Date : 2021-04-29 DOI:10.1080/14702541.2021.1920048
A. C. Whitefield, R. McMorran, J. Paterson, Charles R. Warren
{"title":"Public perceptions of deer management in Scotland: the impact of place of residence, knowledge and demographic factors","authors":"A. C. Whitefield, R. McMorran, J. Paterson, Charles R. Warren","doi":"10.1080/14702541.2021.1920048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Deer have a prominent public and political profile in Scotland because of their iconic status, environmental and socio-economic impacts, and the long-running controversies surrounding their management. However, few studies have examined public perceptions of deer management. This article investigates whether rural and urban place of residence and other demographic factors are significant influences on public perceptions of deer management. A survey (n = 184) in rural and urban locations in Scotland explored public perceptions of deer management in contrasting localities. Place of residence, demographic information and self-reported knowledge levels were analysed to examine their impact on perceptions. Respondents generally agreed that deer management is necessary, with fencing and culling the first and second most preferred management options. Rural or urban place of residence had a limited influence on opinions of deer management, with engagement in land-based employment playing a more important role. Self-reported understanding of deer management was the most important factor in shaping opinions; those with greater knowledge were more likely to support deer culling. The findings suggest that improved public education concerning the need for deer management would be beneficial, increasing public understanding of management practices.","PeriodicalId":46022,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Geographical Journal","volume":"137 1","pages":"67 - 83"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14702541.2021.1920048","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scottish Geographical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14702541.2021.1920048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Deer have a prominent public and political profile in Scotland because of their iconic status, environmental and socio-economic impacts, and the long-running controversies surrounding their management. However, few studies have examined public perceptions of deer management. This article investigates whether rural and urban place of residence and other demographic factors are significant influences on public perceptions of deer management. A survey (n = 184) in rural and urban locations in Scotland explored public perceptions of deer management in contrasting localities. Place of residence, demographic information and self-reported knowledge levels were analysed to examine their impact on perceptions. Respondents generally agreed that deer management is necessary, with fencing and culling the first and second most preferred management options. Rural or urban place of residence had a limited influence on opinions of deer management, with engagement in land-based employment playing a more important role. Self-reported understanding of deer management was the most important factor in shaping opinions; those with greater knowledge were more likely to support deer culling. The findings suggest that improved public education concerning the need for deer management would be beneficial, increasing public understanding of management practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公众对苏格兰鹿管理的看法:居住地、知识和人口因素的影响
鹿因其标志性地位、环境和社会经济影响以及围绕其管理的长期争议,在苏格兰具有突出的公众和政治形象。然而,很少有研究调查了公众对鹿管理的看法。本文调查了农村和城市居住地点以及其他人口因素是否对公众对鹿管理的看法有显著影响。在苏格兰农村和城市地区进行的一项调查(n = 184)探讨了不同地区公众对鹿管理的看法。研究人员分析了居住地、人口统计信息和自我报告的知识水平,以检验它们对认知的影响。受访者普遍认为鹿群管理是必要的,围栏和扑杀是首选的管理方案。农村或城市居住地对鹿群管理意见的影响有限,参与陆上就业发挥更重要的作用。自我报告对鹿管理的理解是形成意见的最重要因素;那些知识丰富的人更有可能支持捕杀鹿。研究结果表明,提高公众对鹿管理必要性的教育是有益的,可以增加公众对管理实践的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The Scottish Geographical Journal is the learned publication of the Royal Scottish Geographical Society and is a continuation of the Scottish Geographical Magazine, first published in 1885. The Journal was relaunched in its present format in 1999. The Journal is international in outlook and publishes scholarly articles of original research from any branch of geography and on any part of the world, while at the same time maintaining a distinctive interest in and concern with issues relating to Scotland. “The Scottish Geographical Journal mixes physical and human geography in a way that no other international journal does. It deploys a long heritage of geography in Scotland to address the most pressing issues of today."
期刊最新文献
Translation urgency in our climate-challenged times: co-producing geographical knowledge on El Niño in Peru Geographies of Hunger: polyvocalising the histories of geographical knowledge productionReviewing A world without hunger. Josué de Castro and the history of geography , by Archie Davies, Liverpool University Press, 2022, 259 pp., ISBN 978-1-80207-720-9 Landscapes of experience: young people, the outdoors, and the power of unfamiliar encounters Unfamiliar Landscapes: Young People and Diverse Outdoor Experiences , edited by Thomas Aneurin Smith, Hannah Pitt and Ria Ann Dunkley, London, Palgrave MacMillan, 2022, 579 pp., £119.99. Geographies of landscape aesthetics: mapping landscape terminology in digitised historical travel accounts of Loch Lomond and the Trossachs ‘We need to stay alive’: ethnicisation and shortage of farm labour in Hungary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1