Development of an evidence-based aphasia therapy implementation tool: an international survey of speech pathologists’ access to and use of aphasia therapy resources

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Aphasiology Pub Date : 2023-09-08 DOI:10.1080/02687038.2023.2253994
Jade K. Dignam, Sam Harvey, K. Monnelly, L. Dipper, Elizabeth Hoover, Melanie Kirmess, Bettina Mohr, E. Visch-Brink, Sarah E. Wallace, Miranda L. Rose
{"title":"Development of an evidence-based aphasia therapy implementation tool: an international survey of speech pathologists’ access to and use of aphasia therapy resources","authors":"Jade K. Dignam, Sam Harvey, K. Monnelly, L. Dipper, Elizabeth Hoover, Melanie Kirmess, Bettina Mohr, E. Visch-Brink, Sarah E. Wallace, Miranda L. Rose","doi":"10.1080/02687038.2023.2253994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Speech and language therapy can reduce the level of impairment and disability caused by aphasia (Brady et al., 2016). Selecting a therapy can be challenging for clinicians who may struggle to stay abreast of the best evidence to support therapy selection (Rose et al., 2014). Once a therapy is selected, accessing relevant resources is a significant barrier to implementation (Shrubsole et al., 2019). The Aphasia Therapy Finder (ATF) is proposed to be an online repository of therapy resources designed to aid selection of evidence-based aphasia therapies and to bridge the evidence-practice gap in aphasia rehabilitation. Aims: In this study, we aimed to explore speech pathologists’ selection and use of aphasia therapy approaches, and access to aphasia therapy resources in clinical practice. We further aimed to explore speech pathologists’ perspectives on the proposed ATF. Methods & Procedures: A cross-sectional, mixed-methods, survey design was employed. A 22-item web-based survey was developed and disseminated to speech pathologists via professional networks internationally. Data analyses included descriptive statistics and conventional content analysis.","PeriodicalId":50744,"journal":{"name":"Aphasiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aphasiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2023.2253994","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Speech and language therapy can reduce the level of impairment and disability caused by aphasia (Brady et al., 2016). Selecting a therapy can be challenging for clinicians who may struggle to stay abreast of the best evidence to support therapy selection (Rose et al., 2014). Once a therapy is selected, accessing relevant resources is a significant barrier to implementation (Shrubsole et al., 2019). The Aphasia Therapy Finder (ATF) is proposed to be an online repository of therapy resources designed to aid selection of evidence-based aphasia therapies and to bridge the evidence-practice gap in aphasia rehabilitation. Aims: In this study, we aimed to explore speech pathologists’ selection and use of aphasia therapy approaches, and access to aphasia therapy resources in clinical practice. We further aimed to explore speech pathologists’ perspectives on the proposed ATF. Methods & Procedures: A cross-sectional, mixed-methods, survey design was employed. A 22-item web-based survey was developed and disseminated to speech pathologists via professional networks internationally. Data analyses included descriptive statistics and conventional content analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于证据的失语症治疗实施工具的发展:语言病理学家获取和使用失语症治疗资源的国际调查
背景:言语和语言治疗可以降低失语症引起的损伤和残疾水平(Brady et al., 2016)。对于临床医生来说,选择一种治疗方法是具有挑战性的,他们可能会努力跟上支持治疗选择的最佳证据(Rose et al., 2014)。一旦选择了治疗方法,获取相关资源是实施的重大障碍(Shrubsole et al., 2019)。Aphasia Therapy Finder (ATF)是一个在线治疗资源库,旨在帮助选择基于证据的失语症治疗方法,弥合失语症康复中的证据与实践差距。目的:本研究旨在探讨语言病理学家在临床实践中对失语治疗方法的选择和使用,以及失语治疗资源的获取。我们进一步旨在探讨语言病理学家对拟议的ATF的看法。方法与步骤:采用横断面、混合方法的调查设计。一份包含22个项目的网络调查通过国际专业网络分发给语言病理学家。数据分析包括描述性统计和常规内容分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aphasiology
Aphasiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aphasiology is concerned with all aspects of language impairment and disability and related disorders resulting from brain damage. It provides a forum for the exchange of knowledge and the dissemination of current research and expertise in all aspects of aphasia and related topics, from all disciplinary perspectives. Aphasiology includes papers on clinical, psychological, linguistic, social and neurological perspectives of aphasia, and attracts contributions and readership from researchers and practitioners in speech and language pathology, neurology, neuropsychology and neurolinguistics. Studies using a wide range of empirical methods, including experimental, clinical and single case studies, surveys and physical investigations are published in addition to regular features including major reviews, clinical fora, case studies, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
An update on validating the Hong Kong Cantonese version of the Comprehensive Aphasia Test (cant-cat) The efficacy of confrontational naming treatments for aphasia: a meta-analysis Narrative production and executive functions in post-stroke agrammatic aphasia Aphasia and acute care: a qualitative study of healthcare provider perspectives “But if you do not keep doing it, you won’t maintain”. A qualitative study on the perspectives of speech-language pathologists on maintenance of therapy gains in aphasia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1