Working to Resonate: Rhetorical Mapping of Disciplinary Stances about Technology, Risk, and the Brain

IF 2 Q2 COMMUNICATION Technical Communication Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-07-20 DOI:10.1080/10572252.2022.2100484
K. Lambrecht
{"title":"Working to Resonate: Rhetorical Mapping of Disciplinary Stances about Technology, Risk, and the Brain","authors":"K. Lambrecht","doi":"10.1080/10572252.2022.2100484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Our largest multidisciplinary problems outpace disciplinary training designed to reinforce boundaries. Using an interdisciplinary conversation about adolescent brain imaging, I argue that disciplinary stances (interdisciplinary, transdisciplinary) operate like rhetorical stases, helping diagnose where conversations build or diverge among experts. Because what constitutes interdisciplinarity is contested, mapping rhetorical features of each disciplinary stance stabilizes definitional debates by grounding interactions in specific discursive practices and offers technical communicators ways to facilitate and participate in stronger crossdisciplinary communication.","PeriodicalId":45536,"journal":{"name":"Technical Communication Quarterly","volume":"32 1","pages":"196 - 211"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technical Communication Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2022.2100484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Our largest multidisciplinary problems outpace disciplinary training designed to reinforce boundaries. Using an interdisciplinary conversation about adolescent brain imaging, I argue that disciplinary stances (interdisciplinary, transdisciplinary) operate like rhetorical stases, helping diagnose where conversations build or diverge among experts. Because what constitutes interdisciplinarity is contested, mapping rhetorical features of each disciplinary stance stabilizes definitional debates by grounding interactions in specific discursive practices and offers technical communicators ways to facilitate and participate in stronger crossdisciplinary communication.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
努力产生共鸣:关于技术、风险和大脑的学科立场的修辞映射
我们最大的多学科问题超过了旨在加强边界的学科培训。通过一个关于青少年脑成像的跨学科对话,我认为学科立场(跨学科,跨学科)就像修辞阶段一样运作,帮助诊断专家之间的对话在哪里建立或分歧。因为跨学科的构成是有争议的,绘制每个学科立场的修辞特征通过在特定的话语实践中建立互动来稳定定义辩论,并为技术传播者提供促进和参与更强的跨学科交流的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
45.50%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Social Problems and Racial Agendas: Analyzing the Structural Racism of Historical Urban Planning Documents Professional Writers’ Emotions, Beliefs, and Decisions Regarding Their English Major Beyond Digital Literacy: Investigating Threshold Concepts to Foster Engagement with Digital Life in Technical Communication Pedagogy Covid and … How to Do Rhetoric in a Pandemic Building Translator Repertoire Across a Humanitarian Translation App: Translingual Practice and Tarjimly
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1