Public-school infrastructure ageing and current challenges in maintenance

IF 1.8 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering Pub Date : 2022-08-16 DOI:10.1108/jqme-06-2021-0043
N. Herath, C. Duffield, Lihai Zhang
{"title":"Public-school infrastructure ageing and current challenges in maintenance","authors":"N. Herath, C. Duffield, Lihai Zhang","doi":"10.1108/jqme-06-2021-0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeSchool infrastructure is one of critical factors that significantly contribute to the educational outcomes, and therefore, maintaining the high quality of school infrastructure becomes of critical importance. Due to the ageing of school assets over time in combination with budget constraint and rapid growth of student enrolment, many public schools are currently struggling to maintain the required standard for long term. However, to date, the goal of providing the best maintenance practices to public schools has not been achieved.Design/methodology/approachThe present study focuses on studying the balance between the asset and maintenance management strategies and the funding model through conducting state-of-the-art literature review and qualitative analysis in the context of public schools in Australia and other developed countries around the world. Review of journal articles, different government reports and other available resources were used to collect and analyse the data in this study.FindingsAs part of this review, significant under investment in maintenance and asset renewals were identified as main challenges in asset management in public school facilities. Although different maintenance strategies were used in school infrastructure, adequate funding, adequate robust asset management plans (AMPs) and the involvement of private sectors have been identified as the key factors that govern the success in school infrastructure maintenance. It also shows that funding of approximately 2–3% of asset replacement value (ARV) on school infrastructure is required to maintain school facilities for long-term. Further, the procurement methods such as public private partnership including private finance initiatives (PFIs) have shown great improvements in maintenance process in school infrastructure.Originality/valueThe study provides a review of different AMPs and funding models in school infrastructure and their efficiencies and shortcoming in detail. Different states and countries use different maintenance models, and challenges associated with each model were also discussed. Further this study also provides some conclusive evidence for better maintenance performance for school buildings.","PeriodicalId":16938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jqme-06-2021-0043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

PurposeSchool infrastructure is one of critical factors that significantly contribute to the educational outcomes, and therefore, maintaining the high quality of school infrastructure becomes of critical importance. Due to the ageing of school assets over time in combination with budget constraint and rapid growth of student enrolment, many public schools are currently struggling to maintain the required standard for long term. However, to date, the goal of providing the best maintenance practices to public schools has not been achieved.Design/methodology/approachThe present study focuses on studying the balance between the asset and maintenance management strategies and the funding model through conducting state-of-the-art literature review and qualitative analysis in the context of public schools in Australia and other developed countries around the world. Review of journal articles, different government reports and other available resources were used to collect and analyse the data in this study.FindingsAs part of this review, significant under investment in maintenance and asset renewals were identified as main challenges in asset management in public school facilities. Although different maintenance strategies were used in school infrastructure, adequate funding, adequate robust asset management plans (AMPs) and the involvement of private sectors have been identified as the key factors that govern the success in school infrastructure maintenance. It also shows that funding of approximately 2–3% of asset replacement value (ARV) on school infrastructure is required to maintain school facilities for long-term. Further, the procurement methods such as public private partnership including private finance initiatives (PFIs) have shown great improvements in maintenance process in school infrastructure.Originality/valueThe study provides a review of different AMPs and funding models in school infrastructure and their efficiencies and shortcoming in detail. Different states and countries use different maintenance models, and challenges associated with each model were also discussed. Further this study also provides some conclusive evidence for better maintenance performance for school buildings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公立学校基础设施老化和当前的维护挑战
学校基础设施是影响教育成果的关键因素之一,因此,保持学校基础设施的高质量变得至关重要。由于学校资产随着时间的推移而老化,再加上预算限制和学生入学人数的快速增长,许多公立学校目前正努力维持所要求的长期标准。然而,迄今为止,为公立学校提供最佳维修方法的目标尚未实现。设计/方法/途径本研究的重点是通过对澳大利亚和世界其他发达国家公立学校进行最先进的文献回顾和定性分析,研究资产和维护管理策略与资助模式之间的平衡。本研究使用期刊文章、不同的政府报告和其他可用资源来收集和分析数据。作为审查的一部分,在维护和资产更新方面的重大投资不足被确定为公立学校设施资产管理的主要挑战。虽然在学校基础设施中使用了不同的维护策略,但充足的资金、足够健全的资产管理计划(amp)和私营部门的参与已被确定为管理学校基础设施维护成功的关键因素。报告还显示,为了长期维护学校设施,需要为学校基础设施提供大约2-3%的资产重置价值(ARV)。此外,包括私人融资倡议(pfi)在内的公私伙伴关系等采购方法在学校基础设施的维护过程中表现出了很大的改善。原创性/价值本研究详细回顾了学校基础设施的不同amp和资助模式,以及它们的效率和不足。不同的州和国家使用不同的维护模型,并且还讨论了与每种模型相关的挑战。此外,本研究也为改善学校建筑物的维修性能提供了一些结论性的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering
Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: This exciting journal looks at maintenance engineering from a positive standpoint, and clarifies its recently elevatedstatus as a highly technical, scientific, and complex field. Typical areas examined include: ■Budget and control ■Equipment management ■Maintenance information systems ■Process capability and maintenance ■Process monitoring techniques ■Reliability-based maintenance ■Replacement and life cycle costs ■TQM and maintenance
期刊最新文献
Spare parts management in industry 4.0 era: a literature review Data-driven decision-making in maintenance management and coordination throughout the asset life cycle: an empirical study Joint maintenance planning and production scheduling optimization model for green environment Identification of optimal maintenance parameters for best maintenance and service management system in the SMEs Modeling and solving the multi-objective energy-efficient production planning and scheduling with imperfect maintenance activities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1