Analysis of science, technology and innovation (STI) policies of India from 1958 to 2020

V. Sattiraju, M. Janodia
{"title":"Analysis of science, technology and innovation (STI) policies of India from 1958 to 2020","authors":"V. Sattiraju, M. Janodia","doi":"10.1108/jstpm-02-2022-0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to analyse innovation policies in India from 1958 to 2020. A policy tools framework was developed to compare the innovation policies in India. India developed and implemented four innovation policies from 1958 to 2013. The recent policy change was brought in the year 2020 with releasing the draft of the Science, Technology and Innovation Policy (STIP 2020). The authors analysed the recent draft of STIP 2020 with the earlier four innovation policies.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nInnovation policies implemented from 1958 to 2013 in India were studied and analysed in the “text as a data approach” and a comparative policy analysis tool was designed for this purpose. The recent draft of STIP 2020 was evaluated and the provisions of the fifth draft of STIP 2020 were compared with the previous four innovation policies' design and formulation. The CPA tool design consists of five broad themes Awareness and capacity building; Finance and infrastructure; Resource management and governance; Outreach and networking; and Policy implementation and evaluation.\n\n\nFindings\nDraft STIP 2020 has many features similar to earlier policies. However, policy has focused on bringing in more clarity about national challenges, goals and objectives, yet it needs better implementation to achieve stated outcomes more effectively and efficiently. New initiatives include strengthening the innovation system with open science, improving STI education, expanding the financial landscape, establishing national STI observatory acting as a central repository of all data related to the STI ecosystem and accountable research ecosystem, promoting translational and foundational research of global standards, promoting entrepreneurship, self-reliance, mainstream science communication and public engagement and decentralised institutional mechanisms. Thus, the STIP 2020 is ambitious in its approach to promoting STI in India and needs a supportive mechanism to achieve the stated objectives.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nCurrent comparative policy analysis focused only on identifying similarities and differences among innovation policies implemented in India from 1958 to 2020 and its evolutionary changes in policy and its instruments choice. The recent draft STIP 2020 is not approved and has no update regarding its approval and implementation by the government. The revised and yet to implement STIP 2020 may have variances in the policy instruments. The earlier policies are so broad and without specific problem statements. They were released as statements and resolutions which makes it is challenging to understand the impact of each policy. Similar policy tools in STI 2013 and STIP 2020 were only considered to observe the policy instrument choice. The achievements of the innovation policies implemented before STIP 2020 are not included. Evolutionary changes in the problem statements and policy tools prescribed in innovation policies are studied.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nDepartment of Science and Technology, Government of India, released a draft of STIP in 2020. The draft of STIP was evaluated with previous Innovation Policies. To the authors’ understanding, this is the first attempt to evaluate the STIPs of India using the “text as a data” approach. The tool can be validated by using it for CPA of innovation policies of other emerging, developed and least developed economies to understand cross-country variations in policy instrument choice by policymakers.\n","PeriodicalId":45751,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jstpm-02-2022-0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyse innovation policies in India from 1958 to 2020. A policy tools framework was developed to compare the innovation policies in India. India developed and implemented four innovation policies from 1958 to 2013. The recent policy change was brought in the year 2020 with releasing the draft of the Science, Technology and Innovation Policy (STIP 2020). The authors analysed the recent draft of STIP 2020 with the earlier four innovation policies. Design/methodology/approach Innovation policies implemented from 1958 to 2013 in India were studied and analysed in the “text as a data approach” and a comparative policy analysis tool was designed for this purpose. The recent draft of STIP 2020 was evaluated and the provisions of the fifth draft of STIP 2020 were compared with the previous four innovation policies' design and formulation. The CPA tool design consists of five broad themes Awareness and capacity building; Finance and infrastructure; Resource management and governance; Outreach and networking; and Policy implementation and evaluation. Findings Draft STIP 2020 has many features similar to earlier policies. However, policy has focused on bringing in more clarity about national challenges, goals and objectives, yet it needs better implementation to achieve stated outcomes more effectively and efficiently. New initiatives include strengthening the innovation system with open science, improving STI education, expanding the financial landscape, establishing national STI observatory acting as a central repository of all data related to the STI ecosystem and accountable research ecosystem, promoting translational and foundational research of global standards, promoting entrepreneurship, self-reliance, mainstream science communication and public engagement and decentralised institutional mechanisms. Thus, the STIP 2020 is ambitious in its approach to promoting STI in India and needs a supportive mechanism to achieve the stated objectives. Research limitations/implications Current comparative policy analysis focused only on identifying similarities and differences among innovation policies implemented in India from 1958 to 2020 and its evolutionary changes in policy and its instruments choice. The recent draft STIP 2020 is not approved and has no update regarding its approval and implementation by the government. The revised and yet to implement STIP 2020 may have variances in the policy instruments. The earlier policies are so broad and without specific problem statements. They were released as statements and resolutions which makes it is challenging to understand the impact of each policy. Similar policy tools in STI 2013 and STIP 2020 were only considered to observe the policy instrument choice. The achievements of the innovation policies implemented before STIP 2020 are not included. Evolutionary changes in the problem statements and policy tools prescribed in innovation policies are studied. Originality/value Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, released a draft of STIP in 2020. The draft of STIP was evaluated with previous Innovation Policies. To the authors’ understanding, this is the first attempt to evaluate the STIPs of India using the “text as a data” approach. The tool can be validated by using it for CPA of innovation policies of other emerging, developed and least developed economies to understand cross-country variations in policy instrument choice by policymakers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1958 - 2020年印度科技创新政策分析
目的本文旨在分析1958年至2020年印度的创新政策。制定了一个政策工具框架来比较印度的创新政策。1958年至2013年,印度制定并实施了四项创新政策。最近的政策变化是在2020年发布的科学、技术和创新政策草案(STIP 2020)。作者分析了2020年科技创新政策的最新草案以及之前的四项创新政策。设计/方法/方法1958年至2013年在印度实施的创新政策在“文本作为数据方法”中进行了研究和分析,并为此设计了一个比较政策分析工具。对最近的《2020年科技创新政策》草案进行了评估,并将《2020年技术创新政策》第五稿的规定与之前四项创新政策的设计和制定进行了比较。CPA工具设计包括五大主题:认识和能力建设;金融和基础设施;资源管理和治理;外联和联网;以及政策执行和评价。FindingsDraft STIP 2020有许多与早期政策类似的功能。然而,政策的重点是更加明确国家挑战、目标和目的,但需要更好地实施,才能更有效地实现既定成果。新举措包括加强开放科学的创新体系,改善科技创新教育,扩大金融格局,建立国家科技创新观测站,作为与科技创新生态系统和负责任研究生态系统相关的所有数据的中央存储库,促进全球标准的转化和基础研究,促进创业、自力更生,主流科学传播和公众参与以及分散的体制机制。因此,《2020年科技创新方案》在促进印度科技创新方面雄心勃勃,需要一个支持机制来实现既定目标。研究局限性/含义当前的比较政策分析仅侧重于确定1958年至2020年印度实施的创新政策之间的异同及其政策和工具选择的演变变化。最近的2020年科技创新政策草案尚未获得批准,政府也没有更新其批准和实施情况。经修订但尚未实施的《2020年科技创新政策》可能在政策工具上存在差异。早期的政策非常宽泛,没有具体的问题说明。它们是以声明和决议的形式发布的,这使得理解每项政策的影响具有挑战性。2013年科技创新和2020年科技创新中的类似政策工具仅被视为观察政策工具的选择。不包括2020年科技创新计划之前实施的创新政策的成就。研究了创新政策中问题陈述和政策工具的进化变化。创意/价值印度政府科技部于2020年发布了STIP草案。科技创新计划草案与之前的创新政策进行了评估。据作者所知,这是首次尝试使用“文本作为数据”的方法来评估印度的性传播感染。该工具可以通过将其用于其他新兴、发达和最不发达经济体创新政策的全面注册会计师来验证,以了解决策者在政策工具选择方面的跨国差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Editorial: “Digital transformation, innovation and competitiveness: some insights from Asia” Mathematical optimization of the sustainable gasoline supply chain: systematic literature review Exploring prospects of blockchain and fintech: using SLR approach Factors affecting the adoption of mobile payment services during the COVID-19 pandemic: an application of extended UTAUT2 model Developing entrepreneurship skills in scientific academia: best practices from India and Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1