Community construals of CSR for happiness: a mixed-method study using natural language

IF 3.1 Q2 BUSINESS Society and Business Review Pub Date : 2022-11-08 DOI:10.1108/sbr-05-2022-0149
A. Chia, Kim, Doyle, Margaret L. Kern
{"title":"Community construals of CSR for happiness: a mixed-method study using natural language","authors":"A. Chia, Kim, Doyle, Margaret L. Kern","doi":"10.1108/sbr-05-2022-0149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nDrawing upon a contractarian lens of corporate social responsibility (CSR), this study aims to explore community construals of happiness and evaluates conceptual boundaries of CSR for happiness.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nUsing a mixed-methods design, natural language processing and thematic analysis techniques were used to analyse large volumes of textual survey data collected from over 1,000 research participants through an online survey.\n\n\nFindings\nResults indicated that lay construals of happiness were primarily defined in terms of socioeconomic conditions and psychoemotional experiences. In explicating the boundary conditions, community perceptions regarding the extent of businesses’ social responsibilities for happiness were evidenced in five themes: that businesses have a responsibility not to harm happiness, a responsibility to enable conditions for happiness to occur, a responsibility to exercise awareness of happiness implications in decision-making, a responsibility for happiness that is limited by strategic purpose and resource capability and a responsibility for happiness that is limited by stakeholder proximity.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study contributes to the theoretical and empirical foundation of CSR for happiness while simultaneously developing and applying a novel approach for processing and analysing large volumes of qualitative survey-based data.\n","PeriodicalId":44608,"journal":{"name":"Society and Business Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society and Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sbr-05-2022-0149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose Drawing upon a contractarian lens of corporate social responsibility (CSR), this study aims to explore community construals of happiness and evaluates conceptual boundaries of CSR for happiness. Design/methodology/approach Using a mixed-methods design, natural language processing and thematic analysis techniques were used to analyse large volumes of textual survey data collected from over 1,000 research participants through an online survey. Findings Results indicated that lay construals of happiness were primarily defined in terms of socioeconomic conditions and psychoemotional experiences. In explicating the boundary conditions, community perceptions regarding the extent of businesses’ social responsibilities for happiness were evidenced in five themes: that businesses have a responsibility not to harm happiness, a responsibility to enable conditions for happiness to occur, a responsibility to exercise awareness of happiness implications in decision-making, a responsibility for happiness that is limited by strategic purpose and resource capability and a responsibility for happiness that is limited by stakeholder proximity. Originality/value This study contributes to the theoretical and empirical foundation of CSR for happiness while simultaneously developing and applying a novel approach for processing and analysing large volumes of qualitative survey-based data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于自然语言的社会责任社区建构研究
目的从企业社会责任(CSR)的契约视角出发,本研究旨在探索社区对幸福的理解,并评估CSR对幸福的概念边界。设计/方法/方法使用混合方法设计、自然语言处理和主题分析技术,通过在线调查分析从1000多名研究参与者那里收集的大量文本调查数据。研究结果表明,幸福的非理性解释主要是根据社会经济条件和心理情感体验来定义的。在解释边界条件时,社区对企业对幸福的社会责任程度的看法体现在五个主题上:企业有责任不损害幸福,有责任创造幸福的条件,有责任在决策中意识到幸福的含义,一种受战略目标和资源能力限制的幸福责任,以及一种受利益相关者接近度限制的幸福义务。独创性/价值这项研究为企业社会责任促进幸福的理论和实证基础做出了贡献,同时开发和应用了一种新的方法来处理和分析大量基于定性调查的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
The influence of workplace Confucian culture on employees’ organizational commitment through the modelling role of moral identities Corporate social responsibility and tax avoidance: the moderating role of economic freedom The impact of flexible work arrangements on an older grieving population Mandatory CSR regime strips the competitive advantage: a comparative study of pre-post CSR mandate using the Bandwagon-bias effect theory Back to the basics: is business ethics an oxymoron?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1