Regional response of zoysiagrass turf to glufosinate and glyphosate applied during post-dormancy transition based on accumulated heat units

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q3 AGRONOMY Weed Technology Pub Date : 2023-07-10 DOI:10.1017/wet.2023.46
J. M. Craft, Navdeep Godara, Jeffrey F Derr, Adam D. Nichols, J. McCurdy, Michael P Richard, S. Askew
{"title":"Regional response of zoysiagrass turf to glufosinate and glyphosate applied during post-dormancy transition based on accumulated heat units","authors":"J. M. Craft, Navdeep Godara, Jeffrey F Derr, Adam D. Nichols, J. McCurdy, Michael P Richard, S. Askew","doi":"10.1017/wet.2023.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Turfgrass managers apply nonselective herbicides to control winter annual weeds during dormancy of warm-season turfgrass. Zoysiagrass subcanopies, however, retain green leaves and stems during winter dormancy, especially in warmer climatic regions. The partially green zoysiagrass often deters the use of nonselective herbicides due to variable injury concerns in transition and southern climatic zones. This study evaluated zoysiagrass response to glyphosate and glufosinate applied at four different growing-degree-day (GDD) based application timings during post-dormancy transition under different geographic regions, including Blacksburg, VA; Starkville, MS; and Virginia Beach, VA, in 2018 and 2019. GDD was calculated using a 5C base temperature with accumulation beginning January 1 each yr, and targeted application timings were 125, 200, 275, and 350 GDD5C. Zoysiagrass injury response to glyphosate and glufosinate was consistent across a broad growing region from northern Mississippi to coastal Virginia but varied by application timing. Glyphosate application at 125 and 200 GDD5C can be utilized safely for weed control during post-dormancy period of zoysiagrass, while glufosinate caused unacceptable turf injury regardless of application timings. Glyphosate and glufosinate exhibited a stepwise increase to maximum injury with increasing targeted GDD5C application timings. Glyphosate applied at 125 or 200 GDD5C did not injure zoysiagrass above a threshold of 30%, while glufosinate caused greater than 30% injury for 28 and 29 d when applied at 125 and 200 GDD5C, respectively. Likewise, glyphosate application at 125 or 200 GDD5C did not affect the zoysiagrass green cover area under progress curve d-1, while later application timings reduced it. Glyphosate and glufosinate caused higher injury to zoysiagrass when applied at greater cumulative heat units and were attributed to increasing turfgrass green leaf density, as heat unit accumulation is positively correlated with green leaf density. Accumulated heat unit-based application timing will allow practitioners to apply nonselective herbicides with reduced injury concerns.","PeriodicalId":23710,"journal":{"name":"Weed Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weed Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2023.46","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Turfgrass managers apply nonselective herbicides to control winter annual weeds during dormancy of warm-season turfgrass. Zoysiagrass subcanopies, however, retain green leaves and stems during winter dormancy, especially in warmer climatic regions. The partially green zoysiagrass often deters the use of nonselective herbicides due to variable injury concerns in transition and southern climatic zones. This study evaluated zoysiagrass response to glyphosate and glufosinate applied at four different growing-degree-day (GDD) based application timings during post-dormancy transition under different geographic regions, including Blacksburg, VA; Starkville, MS; and Virginia Beach, VA, in 2018 and 2019. GDD was calculated using a 5C base temperature with accumulation beginning January 1 each yr, and targeted application timings were 125, 200, 275, and 350 GDD5C. Zoysiagrass injury response to glyphosate and glufosinate was consistent across a broad growing region from northern Mississippi to coastal Virginia but varied by application timing. Glyphosate application at 125 and 200 GDD5C can be utilized safely for weed control during post-dormancy period of zoysiagrass, while glufosinate caused unacceptable turf injury regardless of application timings. Glyphosate and glufosinate exhibited a stepwise increase to maximum injury with increasing targeted GDD5C application timings. Glyphosate applied at 125 or 200 GDD5C did not injure zoysiagrass above a threshold of 30%, while glufosinate caused greater than 30% injury for 28 and 29 d when applied at 125 and 200 GDD5C, respectively. Likewise, glyphosate application at 125 or 200 GDD5C did not affect the zoysiagrass green cover area under progress curve d-1, while later application timings reduced it. Glyphosate and glufosinate caused higher injury to zoysiagrass when applied at greater cumulative heat units and were attributed to increasing turfgrass green leaf density, as heat unit accumulation is positively correlated with green leaf density. Accumulated heat unit-based application timing will allow practitioners to apply nonselective herbicides with reduced injury concerns.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于累积热量单位的结结草草皮对休眠后过渡期间施用草甘膦和草甘膦的区域响应
在暖季草坪草休眠期间,草坪管理者使用非选择性除草剂来控制冬季年度杂草。然而,结缕草亚冠层在冬季休眠期间保留绿色的叶子和茎,特别是在气候较温暖的地区。部分绿色的结缕草往往阻碍非选择性除草剂的使用,因为在过渡和南方气候带有不同的伤害问题。本研究评估了在不同地理区域,包括弗吉尼亚州Blacksburg,在休眠后过渡期间,在四种不同的生长度日(GDD)施肥时间施用草甘膦和草铵草的反应;斯塔克维尔女士;以及弗吉尼亚州弗吉尼亚海滩,分别在2018年和2019年。GDD采用每年1月1日开始积累的5℃基础温度计算,目标施用时间为125、200、275和350 GDD5C。从密西西比州北部到弗吉尼亚沿海的广大种植区域,结草对草甘膦和草铵膦的伤害反应是一致的,但因施用时间而异。施用125和200 GDD5C的草甘膦可以安全地用于结草休眠后的杂草控制,而无论施用时间如何,草甘膦都会对草坪造成不可接受的伤害。草甘膦和草铵膦随GDD5C靶向施药时间的增加而逐渐增加,达到最大伤害。施用125和200 GDD5C时,草甘膦对结缕草的伤害阈值在30%以上,而施用125和200 GDD5C时,草甘膦对结缕草的伤害阈值分别在28和29 d大于30%。同样,施用125或200 GDD5C的草甘膦对进程曲线d-1下的结日草绿覆盖面积没有影响,而后期施用则使其减少。当施用草甘膦和草铵膦时,累积热量单位越大,对结缕草的伤害越大,这归因于草坪草绿叶密度的增加,因为热量单位积累与绿叶密度呈正相关。累积热量单位为基础的应用时间将允许从业者使用非选择性除草剂减少伤害的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Weed Technology
Weed Technology 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
21.40%
发文量
89
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Weed Technology publishes original research and scholarship in the form of peer-reviewed articles focused on understanding how weeds are managed. The journal focuses on: - Applied aspects concerning the management of weeds in agricultural systems - Herbicides used to manage undesired vegetation, weed biology and control - Weed/crop management systems - Reports of new weed problems -New technologies for weed management and special articles emphasizing technology transfer to improve weed control -Articles dealing with plant growth regulators and management of undesired plant growth may also be accepted, provided there is clear relevance to weed science technology, e.g., turfgrass or woody plant management along rights-of-way, vegetation management in forest, aquatic, or other non-crop situations. -Surveys, education, and extension topics related to weeds will also be considered
期刊最新文献
Impact of reduced rates of tiafenacil at vegetative growth stages on rice growth and yield Biologically effective dose of diflufenican applied preemergence for the control of multiple herbicide-resistant waterhemp in corn Target site mechanism confers resistance pattern of ACCase-inhibitors in bearded sprangletop (Leptochloa fusca ssp. fascicularis) from California Development and Validation of Avena Integrated Management (AIM): A Bioeconomic Decision Support Tool for Wild Oat Management in Australian Grain Production Systems Grain Sorghum Response to Simulated Fomesafen and Terbacil Carryover from Watermelons in Georgia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1