Alternate dosing of fingolimod in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A systematic review.

IF 0.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Current Journal of Neurology Pub Date : 2023-04-04 DOI:10.18502/cjn.v22i2.13339
Fereshteh Ghadiri, Omid Mirmosayyeb, Mohammad Ali Sahraian, Abdorreza Naser Moghadasi, Mahsa Ghajarzadeh
{"title":"Alternate dosing of fingolimod in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A systematic review.","authors":"Fereshteh Ghadiri, Omid Mirmosayyeb, Mohammad Ali Sahraian, Abdorreza Naser Moghadasi, Mahsa Ghajarzadeh","doi":"10.18502/cjn.v22i2.13339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Fingolimod is approved in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) with the recommended dose of 0.5 mg daily. To tackle possible adverse events, some clinicians may reduce the dose of fingolimod, mainly in the alternate-day form. We systematically reviewed the literature for efficacy measures of this method. <b>Methods:</b> PubMed (Medline®), Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched until April 9, 2021. Clinical studies (other than case reports and case series), in English, were included. Then, publications concerning alternate dose fingolimod (including every other day, every two or three days) were selected. Those studies concerning reduced daily dose (any daily dose less than 0.5 mg/day) were excluded to focus on alternate dosing. <b>Results:</b> Four observational studies were included. Data on Ohtani et al. study were limited. Three other studies were of good quality based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A total of 296 patients on the standard dose were compared to 276 patients on the alternate dosage. The most common reason for switching to the alternate dose was lymphopenia, followed by elevated liver enzymes. Two studies concluded that the alternate dosing could be a safe, yet effective strategy in patients with intolerable adverse effects of daily dose. However, Zecca et al. warned about the high possibility of disease reactivation. Due to the differences in outcome measures of the studies, meta-analysis was not applicable. <b>Conclusion:</b> This systematic review highlights the ambiguity of evidence on safety and efficacy of alternate dosing of fingolimod, encouraging further research on the subject.</p>","PeriodicalId":40077,"journal":{"name":"Current Journal of Neurology","volume":"22 1","pages":"110-114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10460927/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/cjn.v22i2.13339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fingolimod is approved in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) with the recommended dose of 0.5 mg daily. To tackle possible adverse events, some clinicians may reduce the dose of fingolimod, mainly in the alternate-day form. We systematically reviewed the literature for efficacy measures of this method. Methods: PubMed (Medline®), Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched until April 9, 2021. Clinical studies (other than case reports and case series), in English, were included. Then, publications concerning alternate dose fingolimod (including every other day, every two or three days) were selected. Those studies concerning reduced daily dose (any daily dose less than 0.5 mg/day) were excluded to focus on alternate dosing. Results: Four observational studies were included. Data on Ohtani et al. study were limited. Three other studies were of good quality based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A total of 296 patients on the standard dose were compared to 276 patients on the alternate dosage. The most common reason for switching to the alternate dose was lymphopenia, followed by elevated liver enzymes. Two studies concluded that the alternate dosing could be a safe, yet effective strategy in patients with intolerable adverse effects of daily dose. However, Zecca et al. warned about the high possibility of disease reactivation. Due to the differences in outcome measures of the studies, meta-analysis was not applicable. Conclusion: This systematic review highlights the ambiguity of evidence on safety and efficacy of alternate dosing of fingolimod, encouraging further research on the subject.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
芬戈莫德交替给药治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症:一项系统综述
背景:芬戈利莫被批准用于复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS),推荐剂量为每天0.5 mg。为了应对可能的不良事件,一些临床医生可能会减少芬戈利莫的剂量,主要是隔日形式。我们系统地回顾了该方法的疗效测量文献。方法:检索PubMed(Medline®)、Web of Science、Embase、Scopus和Cochrane Library数据库,直到2021年4月9日。包括英文的临床研究(病例报告和病例系列除外)。然后,选择关于芬戈利莫替代剂量的出版物(包括每隔一天、每两天或三天)。那些关于减少日剂量(任何低于0.5 mg/天的日剂量)的研究被排除在外,以集中于交替给药。结果:纳入四项观察性研究。Ohtani等人的研究数据有限。根据纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表,其他三项研究质量良好。共有296名服用标准剂量的患者与276名服用替代剂量的患者进行了比较。改用替代剂量的最常见原因是淋巴细胞减少,其次是肝酶升高。两项研究得出结论,对于日剂量不良反应难以忍受的患者,交替给药可能是一种安全而有效的策略。然而,Zecca等人警告说,疾病重新激活的可能性很高。由于研究结果测量的差异,荟萃分析不适用。结论:这篇系统综述强调了芬戈利莫交替给药的安全性和有效性证据的模糊性,鼓励对该主题进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Journal of Neurology
Current Journal of Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sequential changes in expression of long non-coding RNAs THRIL and MALAT1 after ischemic stroke. Tinnitus and reduced word recognition with a bilateral inferior colliculus infarction after cerebellar arteriovenous malformation embolization. Validity and reliability of the Iranian-developed version of the leisure questionnaire for people with multiple sclerosis: Psychometric properties. A study on possible risk factors for progressive supranuclear palsy in southern part of India. Anticoagulation in the management of septic cavernous sinus thrombosis secondary to rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis: A retrospective real-world experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1