The Informal Use of Time as a Component of Multicultural Regional Identity in Transcarpathia (Ukraine)

IF 0.2 Q2 HISTORY East Central Europe Pub Date : 2021-04-16 DOI:10.30965/18763308-48010007
Csilla Fedinec, István Csernicskó
{"title":"The Informal Use of Time as a Component of Multicultural Regional Identity in Transcarpathia (Ukraine)","authors":"Csilla Fedinec, István Csernicskó","doi":"10.30965/18763308-48010007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nBased on the data of sociological research, the analysis of the linguistic landscapes of Transcarpathian cities, and quotations from travel guides, this paper illustrates that in Transcarpathia, a significant part of the population—regardless of ethnicity—live their lives not according to the official Kyiv time (eet), but according to the local time (cet). The difference between official centralized time and “local time” appeared in Transcarpathia when the region became annexed to the Soviet Union. Yet before the Second World War, each state in the region used Central European time. The Soviet regime introduced msk, which was two hours ahead. The distinction between “local time” and central time has been maintained since Transcarpathia became part of the newly independent Ukraine. The population of the region has been urged to use a different time zone for a relatively short time from a historical point of view. The persistence of “local time” is also strengthened by the fact that it contributes to the image of Transcarpathia as a particular, specific region of Ukraine. “Local time” in Transcarpathia has become part of the region’s tourism brand.","PeriodicalId":40651,"journal":{"name":"East Central Europe","volume":"48 1","pages":"73-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East Central Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30965/18763308-48010007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on the data of sociological research, the analysis of the linguistic landscapes of Transcarpathian cities, and quotations from travel guides, this paper illustrates that in Transcarpathia, a significant part of the population—regardless of ethnicity—live their lives not according to the official Kyiv time (eet), but according to the local time (cet). The difference between official centralized time and “local time” appeared in Transcarpathia when the region became annexed to the Soviet Union. Yet before the Second World War, each state in the region used Central European time. The Soviet regime introduced msk, which was two hours ahead. The distinction between “local time” and central time has been maintained since Transcarpathia became part of the newly independent Ukraine. The population of the region has been urged to use a different time zone for a relatively short time from a historical point of view. The persistence of “local time” is also strengthened by the fact that it contributes to the image of Transcarpathia as a particular, specific region of Ukraine. “Local time” in Transcarpathia has become part of the region’s tourism brand.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
时间的非正式使用:跨喀尔巴阡(乌克兰)地区多元文化认同的组成部分
基于社会学研究的数据,对喀尔巴阡山脉外城市的语言景观的分析,以及来自旅游指南的引用,本文说明了在喀尔巴阡山脉外,很大一部分人口——无论种族——不是按照官方的基辅时间(eet)生活,而是按照当地时间(cet)生活。官方中央时间和“当地时间”之间的差异出现在喀尔巴阡山脉外,当时该地区被苏联吞并。然而,在第二次世界大战之前,该地区的每个国家都使用中欧时间。苏联政权提前两个小时引进了莫斯科。自从喀尔巴阡峡成为新独立的乌克兰的一部分以来,“当地时间”和中央时间的区别一直保持着。从历史的角度来看,该地区的人口被敦促在相对较短的时间内使用不同的时区。“当地时间”的持久性也得到了加强,因为它有助于将外喀尔巴阡山脉视为乌克兰的一个特殊地区。外喀尔巴阡山脉的“当地时间”已经成为该地区旅游品牌的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Liberation, Resettlement, and Looting in Postwar Memoirs from Poland Unmaking Détente: Yugoslavia, the United States, and the Global Cold War, 1968–1980, written by Lazic, Milorad The Postsocialist Contemporary: The Institutionalization of Artistic Practice in Eastern Europe after 1989, written by Octavian, Esanu Empty Signs, Historical Imaginaries: The Entangled Nationalization of Names and Naming in a Late Habsburg Borderland, written by Ágoston, Berecz List of Peer-Reviewers of Volume 47 (2020)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1