The Notion of Mistake in Blockchain-Based Smart Contracts: An Analysis of B2C2 Ltd v Quoine Pte Ltd from a Comparative Perspective

D. P. Cassar
{"title":"The Notion of Mistake in Blockchain-Based Smart Contracts: An Analysis of B2C2 Ltd v Quoine Pte Ltd from a Comparative Perspective","authors":"D. P. Cassar","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe paper draws a comparative analysis on the doctrine of mistake in contract law between common law and civil law traditions, to explore the legal implications and ramifications of blockchain technology, as one form of dlt, and smart contracting. The case of B2C2 Ltd v. Quoine Pte Ltd is instrumental in portraying how an actual legal dispute may arise in smart contracting relationships, whereby little to no human intervention exists. By comparatively analysing the two legal systems, one may understand better the judgments delivered by the courts in Singapore, the historical common law background leading to such a decision as confirmed also in appellate stage, the consequences such a decision may possibly have on the adoption of similar smart contracting arrangements, and the possible approach under a civil law regime. The conclusions pinpoint some crucial observations relating to the legal approach courts may adopt and their consequences on such contracting arrangements.","PeriodicalId":37233,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-bja10051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper draws a comparative analysis on the doctrine of mistake in contract law between common law and civil law traditions, to explore the legal implications and ramifications of blockchain technology, as one form of dlt, and smart contracting. The case of B2C2 Ltd v. Quoine Pte Ltd is instrumental in portraying how an actual legal dispute may arise in smart contracting relationships, whereby little to no human intervention exists. By comparatively analysing the two legal systems, one may understand better the judgments delivered by the courts in Singapore, the historical common law background leading to such a decision as confirmed also in appellate stage, the consequences such a decision may possibly have on the adoption of similar smart contracting arrangements, and the possible approach under a civil law regime. The conclusions pinpoint some crucial observations relating to the legal approach courts may adopt and their consequences on such contracting arrangements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于区块链的智能合约中的错误概念:B2C2 Ltd与Quoine Pte Ltd的比较分析
本文对普通法和民法传统的合同法错误原则进行了比较分析,以探讨区块链技术作为dlt的一种形式和智能合约的法律含义和后果。B2C2有限公司诉Quoine私人有限公司的案件有助于描述在智能合约关系中可能出现的实际法律纠纷,在这种关系中几乎不存在人工干预。通过比较分析这两种法律制度,人们可以更好地理解新加坡法院作出的判决、导致这一决定的历史普通法背景(也在上诉阶段得到确认)、这一决定可能对采用类似的智能合约安排产生的后果,以及民法制度下可能采取的方法。结论指出了与法院可能采取的法律方法及其对此类合同安排的影响有关的一些关键意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Green Bond Financing and Corporate Environmental Performance Neuroenhancement Patentability and the Boundaries Conundrum in Psychiatric Disorders Developing Offshore Wind Farms – A Comparison and Analysis of the Legal and Governance Frameworks of the North Sea Coastal States Transfer of Climate Litigation to Biodiversity Protection? Money Makes The World Go Hot – Climate Litigation Against Banks?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1