A study for tube current exposure time products and image quality in digital mammography

T. Kang, Yunfu Liu, Dandan Liu, Lili Zhang, Y. Niu
{"title":"A study for tube current exposure time products and image quality in digital mammography","authors":"T. Kang, Yunfu Liu, Dandan Liu, Lili Zhang, Y. Niu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1005-1201.2020.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the relationship between current-exposure time products (mAs) and image quality in digital mammography. \n \n \nMethods \nThe CDMAM phantom of 2 to 7 cm thickness were exposed by manual exposure modes using Mo-Rh anode-filer combinations. The exposure parameters were set as follows: (2 cm, 27 kVp, 10 to 90 mAs); (3 cm, 29 kVp, 20 to 120 mAs); (4 cm, 29 kVp, 20 to 200 mAs); (5 cm, 30 kVp, 40 to 220 mAs); (6 cm, 31 kVp, 40 to 260 mAs); (7 cm, 32 kVp, 80 to 280 mAs). The image quality figure (IQF), contrast to noise ratio (CNR), figure of merit (FOM) and the average glandular dose (AGD) were obtained from images. The optimum filtration and kVp for each breast thickness was found from the calculated FOMs. The optimum mAs for each breast thickness were found from the calculated FOMs and IQFs. And the Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlations among AGD, CNR and IQF. \n \n \nResults \nWith the increase of mAs, the average glandular dose were linearly increased, and the FOM first increased and then decreased or changed slowly. The AGD, CNR and IQF were significantly correlated when the compression thickness was less than 7 cm (r all>0.87, P<0.05). The optimized exposure parameters were list as follows (2 cm,27 kVp,20 to 30 mAs);(3 cm,29 kVp,30 to 50 mAs); (4 cm,29 kVp,80 to 100 mAs); (5 cm, 30 kVp, 80 to 120 mAs); (6 cm, 31 kVp, 100 to 140 mAs); (7 cm, 32 kVp, 80 to 120 mAs). \n \n \nConclusion \nThe optimum range of mAs can be confirmed with different breast compression thickness and the setting of automatic exposure parameters should be chosen in clinical practice. \n \n \nKey words: \nMammography; Image quality; Radiation dosage","PeriodicalId":39377,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua fang she xue za zhi Chinese journal of radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua fang she xue za zhi Chinese journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1005-1201.2020.02.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To investigate the relationship between current-exposure time products (mAs) and image quality in digital mammography. Methods The CDMAM phantom of 2 to 7 cm thickness were exposed by manual exposure modes using Mo-Rh anode-filer combinations. The exposure parameters were set as follows: (2 cm, 27 kVp, 10 to 90 mAs); (3 cm, 29 kVp, 20 to 120 mAs); (4 cm, 29 kVp, 20 to 200 mAs); (5 cm, 30 kVp, 40 to 220 mAs); (6 cm, 31 kVp, 40 to 260 mAs); (7 cm, 32 kVp, 80 to 280 mAs). The image quality figure (IQF), contrast to noise ratio (CNR), figure of merit (FOM) and the average glandular dose (AGD) were obtained from images. The optimum filtration and kVp for each breast thickness was found from the calculated FOMs. The optimum mAs for each breast thickness were found from the calculated FOMs and IQFs. And the Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlations among AGD, CNR and IQF. Results With the increase of mAs, the average glandular dose were linearly increased, and the FOM first increased and then decreased or changed slowly. The AGD, CNR and IQF were significantly correlated when the compression thickness was less than 7 cm (r all>0.87, P<0.05). The optimized exposure parameters were list as follows (2 cm,27 kVp,20 to 30 mAs);(3 cm,29 kVp,30 to 50 mAs); (4 cm,29 kVp,80 to 100 mAs); (5 cm, 30 kVp, 80 to 120 mAs); (6 cm, 31 kVp, 100 to 140 mAs); (7 cm, 32 kVp, 80 to 120 mAs). Conclusion The optimum range of mAs can be confirmed with different breast compression thickness and the setting of automatic exposure parameters should be chosen in clinical practice. Key words: Mammography; Image quality; Radiation dosage
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字乳腺摄影中管电流曝光时间乘积和图像质量的研究
目的探讨数字乳房x线摄影中电流暴露时间积(mAs)与图像质量的关系。方法采用Mo-Rh阳极-滤镜组合的手工曝光方式对厚度为2 ~ 7cm的CDMAM模体进行曝光。暴露参数设置为:(2 cm, 27 kVp, 10 ~ 90 ma);(3 cm, 29 kVp, 20 ~ 120 ma);(4 cm, 29 kVp, 20 ~ 200 ma);(5 cm, 30 kVp, 40 ~ 220 ma);(6 cm, 31 kVp, 40 ~ 260 ma);(7 cm, 32 kVp, 80 ~ 280 ma)。从图像中得到图像质量图(IQF)、噪声对比比(CNR)、优值图(FOM)和平均腺剂量(AGD)。通过计算得到各乳房厚度的最佳滤过率和kVp。根据计算的fom和iqf,找到了各乳房厚度的最佳ma。采用Pearson相关分析分析AGD、CNR和IQF之间的相关性。结果随着ma的增加,平均腺剂量呈线性增加,FOM先升高后降低或变化缓慢。压缩厚度小于7 cm时,AGD、CNR和IQF呈显著相关(r均为0.87,P<0.05)。优化后的暴露参数为(2 cm,27 kVp,20 ~ 30 ma);(3 cm,29 kVp,30 ~ 50 ma);(4 cm,29 kVp,80 ~ 100 ma);(5 cm, 30 kVp, 80 ~ 120 ma);(6 cm, 31 kVp, 100 ~ 140 ma);(7 cm, 32 kVp, 80至120 ma)。结论不同的乳房压迫厚度可确定mAs的最佳范围,临床应选择自动曝光参数的设置。关键词:乳房x线摄影;图像质量;辐射剂量
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zhonghua fang she xue za zhi Chinese journal of radiology
Zhonghua fang she xue za zhi Chinese journal of radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10639
期刊最新文献
Study progress of cerebrovascular interventional surgery robot Value of chest CT screening in the early COVID-19 outbreak Imaging dynamic observation of cured COVID-19 patients with imported coronavirus pneumonia/ 输入性新型冠状病毒肺炎治愈患者肺内病变的影像学动态观察 The diagnostic value of chest CT imaging in differential diagnosis between common-type COVID-19 and mycoplasma pneumonia/ 胸部CT在普通型新型冠状病毒肺炎与支原体肺炎鉴别诊断中的价值 The role of medical imaging in the diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1