Regional dynamical and statistical downscaling temperature, humidity and wind speed for the Beijing region under stratospheric aerosol injection geoengineering
Jia-ling Wang, J. Moore, Liyun Zhao, Chao Yue, Z. Di
{"title":"Regional dynamical and statistical downscaling temperature, humidity and wind speed for the Beijing region under stratospheric aerosol injection geoengineering","authors":"Jia-ling Wang, J. Moore, Liyun Zhao, Chao Yue, Z. Di","doi":"10.5194/esd-13-1625-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. We use four Earth system models (ESMs) to simulate climate\nunder the modest greenhouse emissions RCP4.5 (Representative Concentration Pathway), the “business-as-usual”\nRCP8.5 and the stratospheric aerosol injection G4 geoengineering scenarios.\nThese drive a 10 km resolution dynamically downscaled model (Weather Research and Forecasting, WRF) and a\nstatistically bias-corrected (Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project, ISIMIP) and downscaled simulation in a\n450×330 km domain containing the Beijing Province, ranging from\n2000 m elevation to sea level. The 1980s simulations of surface\ntemperatures, humidities and wind speeds using statistical bias correction\nmake for a better estimate of mean climate determined by ERA5 reanalysis\ndata than does the WRF simulation. However correcting the WRF output with\nquantile delta mapping bias correction removes the offsets in mean state and\nresults in WRF better reproducing observations over 2007–2017 than ISIMIP\nbias correction. The WRF simulations consistently show 0.5 ∘C higher\nmean annual temperatures than from ISIMIP due both to the better resolved\ncity centres and also to warmer winter temperatures. In the 2060s WRF\nproduces consistently larger spatial ranges of surface temperatures,\nhumidities and wind speeds than ISIMIP downscaling across the Beijing\nProvince for all three future scenarios. The WRF and ISIMIP methods produce very\nsimilar spatial patterns of temperature with G4 and are always cooler than\nRCP4.5 and RCP8.5, by a slightly larger amount with ISIMIP than WRF.\nHumidity scenario differences vary greatly between ESMs, and hence ISIMIP\ndownscaling, while for WRF the results are far more consistent across ESMs\nand show only small changes between scenarios. Mean wind speeds show\nsimilarly small changes over the domain, although G4 is significantly\nwindier under WRF than either RCP scenario.\n","PeriodicalId":92775,"journal":{"name":"Earth system dynamics : ESD","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth system dynamics : ESD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-1625-2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Abstract. We use four Earth system models (ESMs) to simulate climate
under the modest greenhouse emissions RCP4.5 (Representative Concentration Pathway), the “business-as-usual”
RCP8.5 and the stratospheric aerosol injection G4 geoengineering scenarios.
These drive a 10 km resolution dynamically downscaled model (Weather Research and Forecasting, WRF) and a
statistically bias-corrected (Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project, ISIMIP) and downscaled simulation in a
450×330 km domain containing the Beijing Province, ranging from
2000 m elevation to sea level. The 1980s simulations of surface
temperatures, humidities and wind speeds using statistical bias correction
make for a better estimate of mean climate determined by ERA5 reanalysis
data than does the WRF simulation. However correcting the WRF output with
quantile delta mapping bias correction removes the offsets in mean state and
results in WRF better reproducing observations over 2007–2017 than ISIMIP
bias correction. The WRF simulations consistently show 0.5 ∘C higher
mean annual temperatures than from ISIMIP due both to the better resolved
city centres and also to warmer winter temperatures. In the 2060s WRF
produces consistently larger spatial ranges of surface temperatures,
humidities and wind speeds than ISIMIP downscaling across the Beijing
Province for all three future scenarios. The WRF and ISIMIP methods produce very
similar spatial patterns of temperature with G4 and are always cooler than
RCP4.5 and RCP8.5, by a slightly larger amount with ISIMIP than WRF.
Humidity scenario differences vary greatly between ESMs, and hence ISIMIP
downscaling, while for WRF the results are far more consistent across ESMs
and show only small changes between scenarios. Mean wind speeds show
similarly small changes over the domain, although G4 is significantly
windier under WRF than either RCP scenario.