Navigating STEM Major and Transfer Destination Choices: Community College Student Experiences through the Lens of Practice Theory

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Community College Review Pub Date : 2023-06-28 DOI:10.1177/00915521231182119
Dana G. Holland Zahner
{"title":"Navigating STEM Major and Transfer Destination Choices: Community College Student Experiences through the Lens of Practice Theory","authors":"Dana G. Holland Zahner","doi":"10.1177/00915521231182119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective/Research Question: This research explores how community college students, who are underrepresented in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields and aspire to vertical transfer in STEM make choices about majors and transfer destinations. The question is important to advancing equity in STEM, which continues to perpetuate disparities in attainment for minoritized, first-generation, and financially disadvantaged students, who disproportionately enter higher education in community colleges. Methods: Using a longitudinal, qualitative research design, the study relied on semi-structured interviewing to generate in-depth evidence about student experiences. Results: Findings showed that career goals were uniformly influential to students, yet career information was unevenly available or comprehensible during community college. Students’ choices about what to major in and where to transfer were iterative and intertwined, with these choices deeply connected to students’ families and lifetime priorities. Delays in student decision-making tended to have less to do with uncertain individual preferences than to lack of information about a specific STEM major and its alignment with possible future degrees, transfer destinations, and career pathways, as well as contingencies associated with the transfer admission process. Conclusions/Contributions: This research demonstrated STEM-specific nuance in how underrepresented community college students navigate major, career, and transfer destination decision-making as well as the influence of family and location-based priorities in student choices. Future research should investigate how to best provide directional support for students’ major and transfer destination decisions, including major-to-career awareness and the academic and personal dimensions of transfer.","PeriodicalId":46564,"journal":{"name":"Community College Review","volume":"51 1","pages":"538 - 566"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community College Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00915521231182119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective/Research Question: This research explores how community college students, who are underrepresented in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields and aspire to vertical transfer in STEM make choices about majors and transfer destinations. The question is important to advancing equity in STEM, which continues to perpetuate disparities in attainment for minoritized, first-generation, and financially disadvantaged students, who disproportionately enter higher education in community colleges. Methods: Using a longitudinal, qualitative research design, the study relied on semi-structured interviewing to generate in-depth evidence about student experiences. Results: Findings showed that career goals were uniformly influential to students, yet career information was unevenly available or comprehensible during community college. Students’ choices about what to major in and where to transfer were iterative and intertwined, with these choices deeply connected to students’ families and lifetime priorities. Delays in student decision-making tended to have less to do with uncertain individual preferences than to lack of information about a specific STEM major and its alignment with possible future degrees, transfer destinations, and career pathways, as well as contingencies associated with the transfer admission process. Conclusions/Contributions: This research demonstrated STEM-specific nuance in how underrepresented community college students navigate major, career, and transfer destination decision-making as well as the influence of family and location-based priorities in student choices. Future research should investigate how to best provide directional support for students’ major and transfer destination decisions, including major-to-career awareness and the academic and personal dimensions of transfer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
STEM专业导航与转学目的地选择:实践理论视角下的社区大学生体验
目标/研究问题:本研究探讨了在科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)领域代表性不足、渴望在STEM领域垂直转学的社区大学生如何选择专业和转学目的地。这个问题对促进STEM的公平性很重要,STEM继续使少数族裔、第一代和经济弱势学生的成绩差距长期存在,他们不成比例地进入社区大学接受高等教育。方法:采用纵向、定性的研究设计,该研究依靠半结构化访谈来产生关于学生经历的深入证据。结果:研究结果表明,职业目标对学生的影响是一致的,但在社区大学期间,职业信息的可获得性或可理解性并不均衡。学生们对专业和转学地点的选择是反复的,相互交织,这些选择与学生的家庭和一生的优先事项密切相关。学生决策的延迟与其说与不确定的个人偏好有关,不如说与缺乏有关特定STEM专业及其与未来可能的学位、转学目的地和职业道路的一致性的信息,以及与转学录取过程相关的意外情况有关。结论/贡献:这项研究证明了STEM在代表性不足的社区大学生如何驾驭专业、职业和转学目的地决策方面的细微差别,以及家庭和基于地点的优先事项对学生选择的影响。未来的研究应该调查如何最好地为学生的专业和转学目的地决策提供方向性支持,包括专业到职业的意识以及转学的学术和个人层面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Community College Review
Community College Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Community College Review (CCR) has led the nation for over 35 years in the publication of scholarly, peer-reviewed research and commentary on community colleges. CCR welcomes manuscripts dealing with all aspects of community college administration, education, and policy, both within the American higher education system as well as within the higher education systems of other countries that have similar tertiary institutions. All submitted manuscripts undergo a blind review. When manuscripts are not accepted for publication, we offer suggestions for how they might be revised. The ultimate intent is to further discourse about community colleges, their students, and the educators and administrators who work within these institutions.
期刊最新文献
STEM Enrollment Decision Trees as Graduation Predictors for Community College Students Enrolled in Remedial Mathematics Exploring Economic & Workforce Development Alignment: A Content Analysis of California’s Community College Baccalaureate Program Applications Applying What We Know About Student Success to Creating a Model for Faculty Success The Academic and Personal Experiences of Engineering Technology and Welding Technology Students: A Literature Review The Good, The Bad, and the Balanced: A Typology of State Merit-Aid Programs for Community College Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1