Thorstein Veblen’s Absentee Ownership in the Age of the Anthropocene: Law, Technology and Climate Crisis

Q3 Social Sciences Contributions to Political Economy Pub Date : 2023-03-07 DOI:10.1093/cpe/bzad002
S. Plotkin
{"title":"Thorstein Veblen’s Absentee Ownership in the Age of the Anthropocene: Law, Technology and Climate Crisis","authors":"S. Plotkin","doi":"10.1093/cpe/bzad002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reconsiders Veblen’s Absentee Ownership on the centennial of its publication in 1923. It offers a reading of the work in relation to climate change in the new geologic age of the Anthropocene. The central finding is that Veblen’s analysis of the power implications of finance capital and law stand up well as guides to understanding the inertia of US energy policy. However, the book’s concept of ‘the industrial system’ is found seriously wanting. Conceiving of ‘the industrial system’ as a balanced whole of inter-connected mechanical processes, Veblen’s model fails to grasp how that industrial logic might be open to the environment and thus a major source of de-stabilising climate warming gases. More, this outcome is a result of industrial processes, regardless of which social group exercises control of the system: e.g. financiers, communists, or technicians. That is, while Veblen well understands the impact of technology on society, he tends not to envision how industrial technology itself can change Nature in unanticipated and destructive ways. The weaknesses of Veblen’s concept are traced back to his understanding of Nature as a structure of brute forces, scientific knowledge of which permits its effective technological control.","PeriodicalId":38730,"journal":{"name":"Contributions to Political Economy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contributions to Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cpe/bzad002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper reconsiders Veblen’s Absentee Ownership on the centennial of its publication in 1923. It offers a reading of the work in relation to climate change in the new geologic age of the Anthropocene. The central finding is that Veblen’s analysis of the power implications of finance capital and law stand up well as guides to understanding the inertia of US energy policy. However, the book’s concept of ‘the industrial system’ is found seriously wanting. Conceiving of ‘the industrial system’ as a balanced whole of inter-connected mechanical processes, Veblen’s model fails to grasp how that industrial logic might be open to the environment and thus a major source of de-stabilising climate warming gases. More, this outcome is a result of industrial processes, regardless of which social group exercises control of the system: e.g. financiers, communists, or technicians. That is, while Veblen well understands the impact of technology on society, he tends not to envision how industrial technology itself can change Nature in unanticipated and destructive ways. The weaknesses of Veblen’s concept are traced back to his understanding of Nature as a structure of brute forces, scientific knowledge of which permits its effective technological control.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人类世时代的缺席所有权:法律、技术与气候危机
本文在1923年《维布伦的缺席所有权》出版一百周年之际对其进行了反思。它提供了一本关于人类世新地质时代气候变化的著作。核心发现是,维布伦对金融资本和法律的权力含义的分析,对理解美国能源政策的惯性很有指导意义。然而,这本书对“工业体系”的概念却被发现严重不足。Veblen的模型将“工业系统”视为一个相互连接的机械过程的平衡整体,未能理解工业逻辑如何对环境开放,从而成为气候变暖气体的主要来源。更重要的是,这种结果是工业过程的结果,无论哪个社会群体控制着这个系统:例如金融家、共产主义者或技术人员。也就是说,虽然维布伦很清楚技术对社会的影响,但他往往不会设想工业技术本身如何以意想不到的破坏性方式改变自然。维布伦概念的弱点可以追溯到他对自然是一种蛮力结构的理解,科学知识允许其有效的技术控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contributions to Political Economy
Contributions to Political Economy Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Contributions to Political Economy provides a forum for the academic discussion of original ideas and arguments drawn from important critical traditions in economic analysis. Articles fall broadly within the lines of thought associated with the work of the Classical political economists, Marx, Keynes, and Sraffa. While the majority of articles are theoretical and historical in emphasis, the journal welcomes articles of a more applied character. It also reviews noteworthy books recently published.
期刊最新文献
Economics Imperialism then and now: Ben Fine on the Changing Relationship between Economics and the Other Social Sciences Money and Its Body in the Social Positioning and Credit Perspectives: Review Article of Samuel A. Chambers’ Money has No Value The Origins and Dynamics of Inequality: Sex, Politics, and Ideology The Place of Law In Political Economy. J.R.Commons’ Legal Foundations of Capitalism at 100: A Retrospective Article Pasinetti on The Cambridge Keynesians*
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1