Civil Liability of Audit Firms – Part II

Krzysztof Ślebzak, M. Zieliński
{"title":"Civil Liability of Audit Firms – Part II","authors":"Krzysztof Ślebzak, M. Zieliński","doi":"10.26399/iusnovum.v16.1.2022.1-k.slebzak-m.j.zielinski","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary The study in question is about civil liability of audit firms. The authors attempt to reconstruct the liability regime for damage caused by audit firms under the Act of 11 May 2017 on statutory auditors, audit firms and public supervision. The considerations lead to an answer to the question whether under the law as it stands there is an independent regime of civil liability of audit firms, and if so, whether it is permissible to apply thereto the provisions of the Civil Code relating to torts and contractual liability and to what extent. Resolving this issue also allows for a reference to other specific issues relating, inter alia, to the scope of application of statutory limits of liability, or qualifying breach of professional standards by the statutory auditors from the point of view of the premises of liability. The first part of the study addresses the issue of the separate civil liability of audit firms and contractual liability for the audit of separate financial statements towards the audited entity. The second part of the study addresses issues of contractual and tort liability against third parties for damages caused in connection with auditing individual financial statements of, as well as the liability of an audit firm in connection with auditing of consolidated financial statements and for the provision of activities other than audit. Conclusions of the paper are also be presented.","PeriodicalId":33501,"journal":{"name":"Ius Novum","volume":"16 1","pages":"5 - 26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ius Novum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26399/iusnovum.v16.1.2022.1-k.slebzak-m.j.zielinski","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary The study in question is about civil liability of audit firms. The authors attempt to reconstruct the liability regime for damage caused by audit firms under the Act of 11 May 2017 on statutory auditors, audit firms and public supervision. The considerations lead to an answer to the question whether under the law as it stands there is an independent regime of civil liability of audit firms, and if so, whether it is permissible to apply thereto the provisions of the Civil Code relating to torts and contractual liability and to what extent. Resolving this issue also allows for a reference to other specific issues relating, inter alia, to the scope of application of statutory limits of liability, or qualifying breach of professional standards by the statutory auditors from the point of view of the premises of liability. The first part of the study addresses the issue of the separate civil liability of audit firms and contractual liability for the audit of separate financial statements towards the audited entity. The second part of the study addresses issues of contractual and tort liability against third parties for damages caused in connection with auditing individual financial statements of, as well as the liability of an audit firm in connection with auditing of consolidated financial statements and for the provision of activities other than audit. Conclusions of the paper are also be presented.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
审计事务所的民事责任——第二部分
本研究是关于审计事务所的民事责任的。作者试图根据2017年5月11日关于法定审计师、审计事务所和公众监督的法案,重建审计事务所造成损害的责任制度。这些考虑导致了一个问题的答案,即根据现行法律,是否有一个独立的审计公司民事责任制度,如果有,是否允许适用《民法典》中关于侵权和合同责任的规定,以及在多大程度上适用。解决这一问题还可以提及其他具体问题,特别是与法定责任限额的适用范围有关的问题,或者从责任前提的角度来看法定审计员违反专业标准的资格问题。研究的第一部分涉及审计公司对被审计实体单独财务报表审计的单独民事责任和合同责任问题。研究报告的第二部分论述了对第三方因审计个别财务报表而造成的损害承担的合同责任和侵权责任问题,以及审计公司在审计合并财务报表和提供审计以外活动方面的责任问题。文中还介绍了论文的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Paradox of Democratic Strengthening: Criminalisation of Political Terrorism as a Legal Discrediting Mechanism The Attack on the Protected Legal Interest: A Criminalisation Principle and an Element of the Criminal Offence? Amendment to the Rights and Obligations of a Journalist in Act: Press Law from the Perspective of Conscience Clause Key Elements of the Criminal Law Conflict System, with Special Reference to Spanish Criminal Law On the Concept of an Appellate Measure in a Criminal Proceeding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1