The concept of velocity in the history of Brownian motion

IF 0.8 4区 物理与天体物理 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE The European Physical Journal H Pub Date : 2020-07-09 DOI:10.1140/epjh/e2020-10009-8
Arthur Genthon
{"title":"The concept of velocity in the history of Brownian motion","authors":"Arthur Genthon","doi":"10.1140/epjh/e2020-10009-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>\nInterest in Brownian motion was shared by different communities: this phenomenon was first observed by the botanist Robert Brown in 1827, then theorised by physicists in the 1900s, and eventually modelled by mathematicians from the 1920s, while still evolving as a physical theory. Consequently, Brownian motion now refers to the natural phenomenon but also to the theories accounting for it. There is no published work telling its entire history from its discovery until today, but rather partial histories either from 1827 to Perrin’s experiments in the late 1900s, from a physicist’s point of view; or from the 1920s from a mathematician’s point of view. In this article, we tackle the period straddling the two ‘half-histories’ just mentioned, in order to highlight continuity, to investigate the domain-shift from physics to mathematics, and to survey the enhancements of later physical theories. We study the works of Einstein, Smoluchowski, Langevin, Wiener, Ornstein and Uhlenbeck from 1905 to 1934 as well as experimental results, using the concept of Brownian velocity as a leading thread. We show how Brownian motion became a research topic for the mathematician Wiener in the 1920s, why his model was an idealization of physical experiments, what Ornstein and Uhlenbeck added to Einstein’s results, and how Wiener, Ornstein and Uhlenbeck developed in parallel contradictory theories concerning Brownian velocity.\n</p>","PeriodicalId":791,"journal":{"name":"The European Physical Journal H","volume":"45 1","pages":"49 - 105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1140/epjh/e2020-10009-8","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Physical Journal H","FirstCategoryId":"4","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjh/e2020-10009-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Interest in Brownian motion was shared by different communities: this phenomenon was first observed by the botanist Robert Brown in 1827, then theorised by physicists in the 1900s, and eventually modelled by mathematicians from the 1920s, while still evolving as a physical theory. Consequently, Brownian motion now refers to the natural phenomenon but also to the theories accounting for it. There is no published work telling its entire history from its discovery until today, but rather partial histories either from 1827 to Perrin’s experiments in the late 1900s, from a physicist’s point of view; or from the 1920s from a mathematician’s point of view. In this article, we tackle the period straddling the two ‘half-histories’ just mentioned, in order to highlight continuity, to investigate the domain-shift from physics to mathematics, and to survey the enhancements of later physical theories. We study the works of Einstein, Smoluchowski, Langevin, Wiener, Ornstein and Uhlenbeck from 1905 to 1934 as well as experimental results, using the concept of Brownian velocity as a leading thread. We show how Brownian motion became a research topic for the mathematician Wiener in the 1920s, why his model was an idealization of physical experiments, what Ornstein and Uhlenbeck added to Einstein’s results, and how Wiener, Ornstein and Uhlenbeck developed in parallel contradictory theories concerning Brownian velocity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
布朗运动史上速度的概念
不同的团体对布朗运动有着共同的兴趣:这一现象首先是由植物学家罗伯特·布朗在1827年观察到的,然后在20世纪初由物理学家提出理论,最终在20世纪20年代由数学家建立模型,同时仍在发展为一种物理理论。因此,布朗运动现在既指自然现象,也指解释它的理论。从物理学家的角度来看,从1827年到20世纪后期佩兰的实验,没有出版的作品讲述它从发现到今天的全部历史,而是部分历史;或者从数学家的角度来看是20世纪20年代。在这篇文章中,为了强调连续性,我们处理跨越刚刚提到的两个“半历史”的时期,调查从物理学到数学的领域转移,并调查后来物理理论的增强。我们以布朗速度的概念为主线,研究了爱因斯坦、斯摩鲁乔夫斯基、朗格万、维纳、奥恩斯坦和乌伦贝克从1905年到1934年的著作以及实验结果。我们展示了布朗运动如何在20世纪20年代成为数学家维纳的一个研究课题,为什么他的模型是物理实验的理想化,奥恩斯坦和乌伦贝克给爱因斯坦的结果添加了什么,以及维纳、奥恩斯坦和乌伦贝克如何在关于布朗速度的平行矛盾理论中发展起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The European Physical Journal H
The European Physical Journal H HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of this journal is to catalyse, foster, and disseminate an awareness and understanding of the historical development of ideas in contemporary physics, and more generally, ideas about how Nature works. The scope explicitly includes: - Contributions addressing the history of physics and of physical ideas and concepts, the interplay of physics and mathematics as well as the natural sciences, and the history and philosophy of sciences, together with discussions of experimental ideas and designs - inasmuch as they clearly relate, and preferably add, to the understanding of modern physics. - Annotated and/or contextual translations of relevant foreign-language texts. - Careful characterisations of old and/or abandoned ideas including past mistakes and false leads, thereby helping working physicists to assess how compelling contemporary ideas may turn out to be in future, i.e. with hindsight.
期刊最新文献
Equilibria and the protomodel of the Sun’s atmosphere by Karl Schwarzschild in hindsight A commented translation of Boltzmann’s work, “Ueber die sogenannte H-Curve.” Bohr and von Neumann on the universality of quantum mechanics: materials for the history of the quantum measurement process From history of physics to “history for physics” The drama of ideas in the history of quantum gravity: Niels Bohr, Lev Landau, and Matvei Bronstein
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1