Methods of intersectional research

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Sociological Spectrum Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1080/02732173.2020.1791772
Joya Misra, C. Curington, Venus Green
{"title":"Methods of intersectional research","authors":"Joya Misra, C. Curington, Venus Green","doi":"10.1080/02732173.2020.1791772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Intersectionality is a powerful concept within sociology, urging scholars to consider how an array of socially constructed dimensions of difference intersect to shape each person’s experiences and actions. This paper provides a number of different blueprints for designing intersectional research, which can be adapted for different purposes. The key methodological tenets of intersectional research are oppression, relationality, complexity, context, comparison, and deconstruction. This paper defines these tenets, addresses misunderstandings of their implications, and applies these tenets to existing intersectional research. Multiple qualitative, comparative, and quantitative strategies can be used to carry out intersectional research; there is not just one way to do intersectional empirical research. While intersectional methods require thought in designing the research, they are doable. What is more, they provide much more nuanced understandings of social relations and inequality. If race, class, gender and other socially constructed dimensions of difference are understood not as static but as dynamic, researchers can employ a wide variety of methodological tools to analyze power relations via their intersections.","PeriodicalId":47106,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Spectrum","volume":"41 1","pages":"9 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02732173.2020.1791772","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.2020.1791772","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

Abstract Intersectionality is a powerful concept within sociology, urging scholars to consider how an array of socially constructed dimensions of difference intersect to shape each person’s experiences and actions. This paper provides a number of different blueprints for designing intersectional research, which can be adapted for different purposes. The key methodological tenets of intersectional research are oppression, relationality, complexity, context, comparison, and deconstruction. This paper defines these tenets, addresses misunderstandings of their implications, and applies these tenets to existing intersectional research. Multiple qualitative, comparative, and quantitative strategies can be used to carry out intersectional research; there is not just one way to do intersectional empirical research. While intersectional methods require thought in designing the research, they are doable. What is more, they provide much more nuanced understandings of social relations and inequality. If race, class, gender and other socially constructed dimensions of difference are understood not as static but as dynamic, researchers can employ a wide variety of methodological tools to analyze power relations via their intersections.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
交叉研究的方法
交叉性是社会学中的一个强大概念,它促使学者们考虑一系列社会建构的差异维度如何交叉影响每个人的经历和行为。本文为设计交叉研究提供了许多不同的蓝图,可以适应不同的目的。交叉研究的主要方法论原则是压迫、关系、复杂性、语境、比较和解构。本文定义了这些原则,解决了对其含义的误解,并将这些原则应用于现有的交叉研究。可以采用多种定性、比较和定量策略进行交叉研究;做交叉实证研究的方法不止一种。虽然交叉方法在设计研究时需要思考,但它们是可行的。更重要的是,它们对社会关系和不平等提供了更细致入微的理解。如果种族、阶级、性别和其他社会建构的差异维度被理解为不是静态的,而是动态的,研究人员可以使用各种各样的方法工具,通过它们的交叉点来分析权力关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Sociological Spectrum publishes papers on theoretical, methodological, quantitative and qualitative research, and applied research in areas of sociology, social psychology, anthropology, and political science.
期刊最新文献
Department of Error. Social class and informal caregiving for family members with Alzheimer’s disease: the role of economic capital, cultural health capital, and social capital Between biological age and social age: age of marriage and first birth among Arab-Palestinian women in Israel The good, the bad, and the profane: Durkheim and the “strong program” in cultural sociology Why some states bring more laws to the gunfight
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1